Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

A Bedside Prediction-Scoring Model for Late-Onset Neonatal Sepsis

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

Insufficient tools for bedside prediction of late-onset neonatal sepsis (LNS) initiated this study. The objective was to develop and validate a simple prediction-scoring model for LNS defined as culture-proven sepsis occurring 72 hours after birth.

METHODS:

The study was performed at a university hospital in Bangkok. The derivation phase included medical records of 1870 neonates, randomly selected from 9347 records of neonates who had been hospitalized for >72 hours during 1998 to 2000, of which 1824 records were available. In all, 100 neonates were clinically suspected of sepsis and 17 had proven LNS. The validation phase included 73 neonates suspected of having sepsis during July 2002to June 2003 and 25 who had LNS. Weighted coefficients from Cox's proportional hazards model and receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were used.

RESULTS:

The incidence density of LNS was 17/11355 (1.5/1000) person-days. A scoring model was developed and consisted of the following: hypotension (score 4), abnormal body temperature (score 3), respiratory insufficiency (score 2), neutrophil band form fraction >1% (score 2), platelet count <150 × 103/μl (score 2), and umbilical venous catheterization (1 to 7 or >7 days; score 2 or 4). The area under the ROC curves for prediction of LNS in a neonate suspected of sepsis in each of the two phases was 0.85 and 0.80, respectively (p=0.436). The mean probabilities of LNS were approximately 0.10 (low risk) for scores from 0 to 3; 0.50 (intermediate risk) for scores from 4 to 6; and 0.70 (high risk) for scores ≥7.

CONCLUSION:

A simple prediction-scoring model for LNS was developed. Validation of the scores suggested good diagnostic performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Purchase on Springer Link

Instant access to full article PDF

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dear P . Infection in the newborn In: Renie J, Roberton N, editors. Textbook of Neonatology. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingston; 1999; 1109–1201.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fanaroff AA, Korones SB, Wright LL, et al. Incidence, presenting features, risk factors and significance of late onset septicemia in very low birth weight infants. The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1998;17:593–598.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mahieu LM, De Dooy JJ, Cossey VR, et al. Internal and external validation of the NOSEP prediction score for nosocomial sepsis in neonates. Crit Care Med 2002;30:1459–1466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mahieu LM, De Muynck AO, De Dooy JJ, et al. Prediction of nosocomial sepsis in neonates by means of a computer-weighted bedside scoring system (NOSEP score). Crit Care Med 2000;28:2026–2033.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Singh S, Dutta S, Narang A . Predicitve Clinical Scores for Diagnosis of Late Onset Neonatal Septicemia. J Trop Pediatr 2003;49:235–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Manroe BL, Weinberg AG, Rosenfeld CR, Browne R . The neonatal blood count in health and disease. I. Reference values for neutrophilic cells. J Pediatr 1979;95:89–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Moons KG, Harrell FE, Steyerberg EW . Should scoring rules be based on odds ratios or regression coefficients? J Clin Epidemiol 2002;55:1054–1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Auriti C, Maccallini A, Di Liso G, et al. Risk factors for nosocomial infections in a neonatal intensive-care unit. J Hosp Infect 2003;53:25–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Brodie SB, Sands KE, Gray JE, et al. Occurrence of nosocomial bloodstream infections in six neonatal intensive care units. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2000;19:56–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Stoll BJ, Gordon T, Korones SB, et al. Late-onset sepsis in very low birth weight neonates: a report from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. J Pediatr 1996;129:63–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Stoll BJ, Hansen N, Fanaroff AA, et al. Late-onset sepsis in very low birth weight neonates: the experience of the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics 2002;110:285–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chien LY, Macnab Y, Aziz K, et al. Variations in central venous catheter-related infection risks among Canadian neonatal intensive care units. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2002;21:505–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fallat ME, Gallinaro RN, Stover BH, et al. Central venous catheter bloodstream infections in the neonatal intensive care unit. J Pediatr Surg 1998;33:1383–1387.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mahieu LM, De Dooy JJ, Lenaerts AE, et al. Catheter manipulations and the risk of catheter-associated bloodstream infection in neonatal intensive care unit patients. J Hosp Infect 2001;48:20–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Carrieri MP, Stolfi I, Moro ML, et al. Intercenter variability and time of onset: two crucial issues in the analysis of risk factors for nosocomial sepsis. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2003;22 (7):599–609.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rodwell RL, Leslie AL, Tudehope DI . Early diagnosis of neonatal sepsis using a hematologic scoring system. J Pediatr 1988;112:761–767.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schelonka RL, Yoder BA . The WBC count and differential: its uses and misuses. Contemp Pediatr 1996;13:124.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schelonka RL, Yoder BA, Hall RB, et al. Differentiation of segmented and band neutrophils during the early newborn period. J Pediatr 1995;127:298–300.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mehr S, Doyle LW . Cytokines as markers of bacterial sepsis in newborn infants: a review. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2000;19:879–887.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rubin LG, Sanchez PJ, Siegel J, et al. Evaluation and treatment of neonates with suspected late-onset sepsis: a survey of neonatologists' practices. Pediatrics 2002;110:e42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Laupacis A, Sekar N, Stiell I . Clinical prediction rules: a review and suggested modifications of methodological standards. JAMA 1997;277:488–494.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Okascharoen, C., Sirinavin, S., Thakkinstian, A. et al. A Bedside Prediction-Scoring Model for Late-Onset Neonatal Sepsis. J Perinatol 25, 778–783 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211404

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211404

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links