Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Validity of Hospital Discharge Data for Identifying Infants with Cardiac Defects

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To examine validity of the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes in discharge data for identifying infants with cardiac defects according to surveillance guidelines.

STUDY DESIGN:

Retrospective medical record review of infants born in 2001 at one hospital in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Infants were identified using ICD-9-CM codes from hospital discharge data, and keywords in medical records.

RESULTS:

Of 2697 children, ICD-9-CM codes identified 66 infants coded with cardiac defects; physician review confirmed 24 had cardiac defects. Only 35 of 85 (41.2%) ICD-9-CM codes accurately reflected the cardiac defect diagnoses. Additional case finding located four infants with five cardiac defects. Sensitivity of ICD-9-CM codes for identifying these infants was 0.857, predictive value positive was 0.364.

CONCLUSIONS:

ICD-9-CM codes from hospital discharge data identified most infants with cardiac defects, but many were false positives. ICD-9-CM codes were inaccurate for specific cardiac defects.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lynberg MC, Edmonds LD . State use of birth defects surveillance. In: Wilcox LSM, James S, editors. From Data to Action: CDC's Public Health Surveillance for Women, Infants, and Children. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health & Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lynberg MC, Edmonds LD . Surveillance of birth defects. In: Halperin W, Baker EL, Monson RR, editors. Public Health Surveillance. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold; 1992: p. 157–171.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Watkins ML, Edmonds L, McClearn A, et al. The surveillance of birth defects: the usefulness of the revised US standard birth certificate. Am J Public Health 1996;86 (5):731–734.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kirby RS . The quality of data reported on birth certificates. Am J Public Health 1997;87 (2):301.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Freedman MA . The quality of data reported on birth certificates. Am J Public Health 1997;87 (11):1867.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cronk CE, Malloy ME, Pelech AN, et al. Completeness of state administrative databases for surveillance of congenital heart disease. Birth Defects Res A 2003;67 (9):597–603.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hexter AC, Harris JA, Roeper P, et al. Evaluation of the hospital discharge diagnoses index and the birth certificate as sources of information on birth defects. Public Health Rep 1990;105 (3):296–307.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. DiGiuseppe DL, Aron DC, Ranbom L, et al. Reliability of birth certificate data: a multi-hospital comparison to medical records information. Matern Child Health J 2002;6 (3):169–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Berman MF, Stapf C, Sciacca RR, Young WL . Use of ICD-9 coding for estimating the occurrence of cerebrovascular malformations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23 (4):700–705.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Faciszewski T, Broste SK, Fardon D . Quality of data regarding diagnoses of spinal disorders in administrative databases. A multicenter study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997;79 (10):1481–1488.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fox DJ, Druschel CM . Estimating prevalence of fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS): effectiveness of a passive birth defects registry system. Birth Defects Res A 2003;67 (9):604–608.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hoffman JI . Congenital heart disease: incidence and inheritance. Pediatr Clin N Am 1990;37 (1):25–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Guidelines for Conducting Birth Defects Surveillance. National Birth Defects Prevention Network Inc., 2004, http://www.nbdpn.org/current/resources/bdsurveillance.html.

  14. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention MACDP. 1998 Procedures Manual, Appendices A and B, CDC 6-Digit Code List 1998.

  15. Callif-Daley FA, Huether CA, Edmonds LD . Evaluating false positives in two hospital discharge data sets of the birth defects monitoring program. Public Health Rep 1995;110 (2):154–160.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Devore J, Peck R . Statistics, the Exploration and Analysis of Data. St Paul: West Publishing Company; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This report was supported in part by a cooperative agreement for the development and improvement of population-based birth defects surveillance programs and the integration of surveillance data with public health programs, funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Cooperative Agreement U50-CCU521124, and an appointment to the Applied Epidemiology Program administered by the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE) and funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Cooperative Agreement U60-CCU007277.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frohnert, B., Lussky, R., Alms, M. et al. Validity of Hospital Discharge Data for Identifying Infants with Cardiac Defects. J Perinatol 25, 737–742 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211382

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211382

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links