Original Article | Published:

Lack of Effect of L-Carnitine Supplementation on Weight Gain in Very Preterm Infants

Journal of Perinatology volume 25, pages 470477 (2005) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Carnitine transfer across the placenta occurs predominantly during the third trimester. Unless L-carnitine is provided, very preterm infants develop carnitine deficiency. Although breast milk and infant formulas contain L-carnitine, parenteral nutrition solutions do not routinely provide L-carnitine. We hypothesized that prolonged L-carnitine supplementation in very preterm infants would improve weight gain and shorten length of stay in the hospital.

STUDY DESIGN

The study was a double-blind parallel placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial. Eligible patients were <29 weeks of gestation, <72 hours of age, and did not have a potentially life-threatening congenital malformation or hereditary metabolic disorder. Patients were stratified by gestational age (23 to 256/7 and 26 to 286/7 weeks), and randomized to receive, either L-carnitine at a dose of 50 μmol/kg/day, or placebo. Carnitine was provided intravenously until the infants tolerated 16 ml/day of feeds. The sample size was calculated to have 80% power to detect a 10% increase in weight gain from birth until 36 weeks of postmenstrual age or discharge from the hospital. Secondary outcome variables included food efficiency (defined as weight gain divided by caloric intake), weight gain at 4 weeks of age, time to regain birth weight and length of stay.

RESULTS

Among the 63 infants enrolled in the trial, 32 were randomized to L-carnitine and 31 to placebo. L-Carnitine supplementation did not significantly affect average daily weight gain from birth until 36 weeks or hospital discharge, or any of the secondary outcome variables.

CONCLUSION

Prolonged supplementation of L-carnitine did not improve long-term weight gain in very preterm infants.

INTRODUCTION

Carnitine is an amino-acid derivative that facilitates transport of fatty acid across mitochondrial membranes, thereby improving the availability of fatty acids for beta-oxidation,1 regulating the free CoA to acylCoA ratio and scavenging potentially toxic organic compounds before they accumulate in the mitochondria. Patients with carnitine deficiency may develop lipid storage myopathy, weakness and myalgias, cardiomyopathy, failure to thrive, hepatomegaly, abnormal liver function tests, recurrent infections, elevated serum levels of triglycerides, hypoglycemia, hypoketonemia, and pancytopenia.2, 3 Placental transport of carnitine to the fetus occurs primarily during the third trimester of pregnancy.4 Carnitine deficiency develops among very low birth weight (VLBW) infants who do not receive exogenous supplementation for 2 to 4 weeks.5 This is related to minimal body stores at birth, limited carnitine production, high carnitine loss in the urine and lack of L-carnitine supplements in standard parenteral solutions.4, 6 Human milk and most infant formulas contain L-carnitine.7 However, the most metabolically stressed neonates typically receive only parenteral alimentation (TPN). Thus, they are the infants at greatest risk for significant alterations of energy metabolism due to inadequate intake of exogenous carnitine.

Among preterm infants, short-term low L-carnitine supplementation doses (50 to 70 μmol/kg/day) have been shown to improve lipid tolerance, ketogenesis, and short-term weight gain.8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 However, one study using high doses, 300 μmol/kg/day,15 of L-carnitine supplementation showed increased protein oxidation and decreased weight gain. In 2000, only one randomized controlled study had evaluated the effect of long-term use of carnitine on growth in VLBW infants,16 and this study had been conducted without sample size analysis. Preliminary data from a national survey indicated that approximately one-third of the neonatal intensive care units in the USA routinely supplemented TPN with L-carnitine.17 The current study was then undertaken to test the hypothesis that L-carnitine supplementation in very preterm infants would improve weight gain and shorten length of stay (LOS). In the mean time, two other long-term randomized controlled studies18, 19 have been completed and published; neither of them showed any benefit of carnitine supplementation on growth and several other outcome variables in very preterm infants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients

Eligible patients were <29-week gestational age (GA), ≤72-hour postnatal age and admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit at Weiler Hospital, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY. GA was assigned based on the best obstetrical estimate if available, or else by the modified Ballard score, which was performed after 12 to 48 hours of life. We excluded infants with potentially life-threatening congenital anomalies or hereditary metabolic disorders. An informed consent was obtained. The Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Montefiore Medical Center approved the protocol. A Data Safety Monitoring Board designated by the IRB monitored the trial.

Procedures

Parenteral and enteral nutrition

TPN was begun on the first day of life, with 1.5 g/kg/day of amino acids (Trophamine, B. Braun Medical, Inc., Irvine, CA), glucose at 4 mg/kg/minute and 1.25 ml/day of multivitamins (Pediatric MVI, Astra Pharmaceuticals, Wilmington, DE). Amino-acid intake was increased daily by 1 g/kg/day, up to 3.5 g/kg/day. Glucose intake was increased, as tolerated, up to a maximum of 13 mg/kg/minute. Intralipid 20% (Fresenius-Kabi Clayton, Nutrition AB, Clayton, NC) was provided as a continuous infusion, started at 0.5 g/kg/day at 24 hours of life, and later increased to a maximum of 3 g/kg/day; the dose was adjusted to maintain serum triglyceride level equal to or less than 150 mg/dl. Trophic feeds were started (10 ml/kg/day divided into three aliquots) in most infants once the vital signs were stabilized and the infant no longer required vasopressor support. Enteral feedings were given every 3 hours using the infant's own mother's milk or a 20 calories per ounce (cal/oz) premature formula (Enfamil Premature 20). When more than 100 ml/kg/day were tolerated, human milk was supplemented with Similac human milk fortifier (Ross Products Division, Abbott Laboratories). Formula-fed infants were advanced to a 24 Cal/fl oz premature formula (Enfamil Premature 24) as tolerated. The caloric content of the feedings was increased as needed up to 30 cal/oz in order to achieve a daily weight gain of at least 20 g/day and a total caloric intake of at least 120 kcal/kg/day. When the infant's weight reached 1800 g, the formula-fed infant was changed to a 22 Cal/fl oz premature formula. Infants with a direct bilirubin >5 mg/dl were changed to Pregestimil 20 or 24 Cal/fl oz.

Randomization and intervention

Enrolled patients were stratified by GA (23 to 256/7 and 26 to 286/7 weeks), and randomized by the pharmacist using a computer-generated table of random numbers. Codes were unblinded only after all patients had reached the study end point. Neonates assigned to the treatment group received L-carnitine (Carnitor@, Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals, Gaithersburg, MD) until 36 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA) or the time of hospital discharge, whichever occurred first. In case of multiple gestations, each infant was randomized independently. The carnitine solution did not contain any D-carnitine, which has been associated with myasthenia syndrome. L-Carnitine supplementation was initiated within 72 hours of life, starting as early as possible following enrollment in the study. L-Carnitine was initially provided as a continuous infusion in the parenteral nutrition. When infants were able to tolerate at least 2 ml of enteral feedings every 3 hours for a minimum of 12 hours, L-carnitine was provided enterally at the same daily dose, divided three times per day. If during the course of hospitalization, oral feedings were interrupted for more than 12 hours, parenteral supplementation was resumed. Patients in the control group received placebo (5% glucose solution) by the same route and at the same volume as those in the treatment group.

Outcome Variables

The main outcome variable was the average daily weight gain (grams per day) from birth until 36 weeks PMA or hospital discharge, whichever occurred first. Secondary outcome variables included food efficiency (defined as weight gain divided by caloric intake, thereby allowing to compare weight gain between groups while taking into account any disparity in caloric intake), weight gain at 4 weeks of life, time to regain birth weight and LOS. We also assessed potential toxicity of L-carnitine.

Statistical Analysis and Sample Size

Sample size was determined using Sample Power (Version 2, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). The total P-value of 0.05 was partitioned between the main outcome variable (p=0.04) and each of the four secondary outcome variables (p=0.01/4=0.0025). We needed 26 patients in each group to detect a weight gain difference of 2 g/day between the two groups with a power of 0.80 and a two-tailed alpha error of 0.04. We selected a difference that would correspond to 10% of the average daily weight gain observed in very preterm infants in our neonatal intensive care unit in 1999, that is, 18.5±2.4 g/day (mean±SD), and thus shorten LOS accordingly. We enrolled 63 patients taking into account potential attrition due to infants’ death at >24 hours or withdrawal from the study.

All analyses were performed on an intent-to-treat basis using SPSS version 10 (SPSS Inc) and StatXact 5.0 (Cytel Statistical Software, Cambridge, MA). Values with normal distribution are presented as mean±SD, while the other continuous variables and ordinal variables are presented as median (range). For each variable, we first tested if GA affected the response to therapy; if not, we compared treatment group and control group without stratification.

Continuous variables with normal distribution were compared between the treatment group and the placebo group by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) taking into account stratification by GA if homogeneity of variance was verified, and by Student's t-test if ANOVA failed to show any effect of GA. Continuous variables in which ANOVA assumptions were violated were compared by two-way ANOVA by ranks using Puri and Sen's L-statistic,20 and, if the latter test failed to show an effect of GA, by using the Mann–Whitney test (Monte Carlo approximation of the exact test). Frequencies were compared using the Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test (exact test)21 and the Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

Description of the Patient Population at Study Entry

Among the 71 babies <29 weeks of GA admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit at Weiler Hospital between November 2000 and January 2002, 63 babies were enrolled in the study (Figure 1). Reasons for nonparticipation included: patient's death before 24 hours (n=2), refusal of consent (n=3), mother's illness (n=1) and failure to approach the mother within 72 hours after delivery (n=2). All demographic and baseline variables were similar between the two allocation groups using bivariate analysis, except for mean airway pressure (MAP) at 24 hours, which was significantly higher in the L-carnitine group than in the placebo group (Table 1).

Figure 1
Figure 1

Flow diagram.

Table 1: Demographic and Baseline Data in Study Population

Outcome Variables

Seven patients died before reaching the study end point, leaving 56 patients (89% survival) for analysis of the main outcome variable (Figure 1; Table 2). Carnitine supplementation was provided intravenously for a median of 11 days (range 4 to 56) and placebo for 10 days (4 to 50). Daily weight gain until end point was greater in patients with GA greater or equal to 26 weeks than in more immature infants (contrast versus <26 week GA infants: 4.4 g/day, 95% confidence interval 0.8, 8.0, p=0.017). However, daily weight gain was not affected by L-carnitine (contrast versus placebo: −0.2 g/day, confidence interval −2.7, +2.3, p=0.870). There was no significant difference between the two groups in any of the planned secondary outcome variables (Table 3) or potential toxicity (Table 4).

Table 2: Average Daily Weight Gain Until End Point
Table 3: Secondary Outcome Variables
Table 4: Potential Toxicity

Post Hoc Analyses

Patients in the treatment group and those in the control group received similar caloric intake until end point (i.e., 36 weeks PMA or hospital discharge), 167±22 versus 177±44 kCal/day, respectively. Carnitine supplementation did not significantly affect PMA at end point (35.4±1.0 weeks, n=28, in the treatment group versus 35.3±0.9 weeks, n=28, in the control group), size at end point (weight 2056±357 versus 2010±289 g, length 43.0±2.8 versus 42.6±2.0 cm, and head circumference 30.8±2.3 versus 30.3±1.6 cm, respectively), or weight at 36 weeks PMA (2032±416 g, n=19, versus 1972±397 g, n=11). Serum triglyceride levels while receiving 3 g/kg of lipid intravenously were not significantly affected by carnitine supplementation (79 mg/dl, range 41 to 93 in the treatment group, n=8, versus 86 mg/dl, range 17 to 205 in the placebo group, n=13). Only one infant had a serum triglyceride level greater than 150 mg/dl.

Since we observed a trend towards an increased need for surgical ligation of the patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), we compared the incidence of ductal ligation after failure to respond to indomethacin. None of 11 patients (0%) in the control group required ductal ligation, compared with 5 of 14 (36%) in the treatment group (p=0.046).

Discussion

This double-blind randomized trial failed to show evidence of benefit of carnitine supplementation on weight gain in very preterm infants at 36 weeks post menstrual age or at hospital discharge. There are several possible limitations to this study. First, we may have missed an effect of L-carnitine supplementation on carnitine depletion and/or carnitine stores, because most infants received partial or full enteral feedings containing L-carnitine. Under these conditions, carnitine levels in the control group were expected to increase to normal values by approximately 2 months of age.19 To our knowledge, no investigator has assessed the effect of L-carnitine supplementation in neonates receiving TPN as their sole nutrition source for more than 3 weeks. Second, we did not measure serum carnitine levels because they may not accurately reflect tissue levels. The dose of L-carnitine supplementation, 50 μmol/kg/day (8 mg/kg/day), was consistent with calculated daily in utero accretion6 and with the estimated intake from 150 ml/kg/day of pooled breast milk.2, 7 Supplementation of preterm infants using doses of 50 to 60 μmol/kg/day significantly increases serum carnitine levels to values at least three times those in controls.10, 11, 13, 14 Third, in contrast with other studies18, 19 we used the same relatively low dose of carnitine of 50 μmol/kg/day both intravenously and enterally, because mean serum carnitine levels in studies using this enteral dose (90.2±28.7 nmol/ml10; 30–40 nmol/ml11) in preterm infants were well above those associated with carnitine deficiency (<20 nmol/ml).22 Using higher doses of carnitine might have yielded serum levels that would have been higher than normal.19 Fourth, we may have missed a true difference in any of the secondary outcome variables for which a power of 0.80 was calculated but with a very stringent alpha error (0.0025). Fifth, we did not assess lipid tolerance, that is, the dose of intralipid resulting in serum triglyceride levels of 150 mg/dl. Nevertheless, serum triglyceride levels obtained during a continuous lipid infusion at 3 g/kg/day were not affected by carnitine supplementation. Finally, a 10% difference in weight gain may seem too small to be clinically significant; however, a 10% reduction in LOS might have been important, given the high cost of neonatal intensive care.

Using the keywords “Clinical Trial” and “Carnitine” to search Medline and the Cochrane Database and our our own personal files we found ten randomized clinical trials8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 18, 19 (Table 5) and one nonrandomized trial15 assessing the effects of L-carnitine supplementation in preterm infants. On March 25, 2005, we conducted an updated Medline search using the keyword “Carnitine”, limited to “Clinical Trial” and “All Infant: birth to 23 months” and a search of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Collaboration 2005, issue 1. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.) using the keyword “Carnitine.” This yielded two additional abstracts from the same institution (randomized trial(s)).23, 24 Whereas three studies showed improved short-term growth,13, 14, 24 none of the three published long-term studies16, 18, 19 showed any effect of carnitine on growth. The systematic review conducted by Cairns (2005, issue 1 version)25 showed no effect of carnitine on weight gain in VLBW infants; however, meta-analysis of long-term weight gain only included the results from one study. We conducted a meta-analysis (fixed effect model) of weight at 36 weeks of PMA, including data from O’Donnell et al.,18 Whitfield et al.,19 and our own data: the weighted mean difference in weight gain associated with carnitine supplementation (n=134, including 72 patients randomized to carnitine and 62 to control treatment) was not significantly different from zero:–24.1 g (95% confidence interval –136.7, +88.5), and there was no significant heterogeneity (χ2 0.35, p=0.84).

Table 5: Randomized Clinical Trials of Carnitine Supplementation in Preterm Infants

None of the previously published randomized trials of carnitine supplementation in preterm infants showed any evidence of toxicity. In our study, there was no observed effect of carnitine supplementation on weight gain or other outcome variables. However, an increase in PDA ligation among infants treated with indomethacin was seen. This post hoc observation may well have resulted from chance. Alternatively, it could have been the result of an interaction between carnitine and indomethacin. Closure of a PDA is mediated by apoptosis, a process that is enhanced by indomethacin.26 Carnitine has been shown to reduce apoptosis in different models, including ischemia–reperfusion injury.27 These data would suggest that an epidemiologic analysis be considered to assess a possible effect of carnitine on PDA in very preterm infants.

The current study is the fourth randomized trial that fails to show any benefit of long-term carnitine supplementation in preterm infants. Although none of the three previous studies showed a significant change in any of several other outcomes, it is possible that rare benefits or side effects could have been undetected, for example, reduced ototoxicity. Until more data become available, the best evidence, based on four long-term studies including the current one, is that routine long-term L-carnitine supplementation does not appear to improve weight gain in preterm infants at doses greater than or equal to 50 μmol/kg/day.

References

  1. 1.

    . Lipid metabolism of the micropremie. Clin Perinatol 2000;27:57–69.

  2. 2.

    , . Primary and secondary alterations of neonatal carnitine metabolism. Semin Neonatol 1999;23:152–161.

  3. 3.

    , , . Primary and secondary carnitine deficiency syndromes. J Child Neurol 1995;10(Suppl 2):S8–S24.

  4. 4.

    . Carnitine supplementation in the premature. Biol Neonate 1990;58(Suppl 1):93–106.

  5. 5.

    , , , , . Plasma carnitine alterations in premature infants receiving various nutritional regimes. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1988;12:37–42.

  6. 6.

    , , , . Effect of nutrition on tissue carnitine concentrations in infants of different gestational ages. Biol Neonate 1985;47:130–135.

  7. 7.

    , . Plasma carnitine and breast milk carnitine intake in premature infants. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1986;5:616–621.

  8. 8.

    , , . Carnitine deficiency in premature infants receiving total parenteral nutrition: effect of L-carnitine supplementation. J Pediatr 1983;102:931–935.

  9. 9.

    , , . The metabolic effects of oral L-carnitine administration in infants receiving total parenteral nutrition with fat. J Pediatr Surg 1985;20:758–764.

  10. 10.

    , , , , . Oral L-carnitine supplementation in low birth weight newborns: a study on neonates requiring combined parenteral and enteral nutrition. Acta Paediatr Hung 1986;27:253–258.

  11. 11.

    , , , , , . Enhanced lipid utilization in infants receiving oral L-carnitine during long-term parenteral nutrition. J Pediatr 1986;109:984–988.

  12. 12.

    , , , , , . Parenteral nutrition in preterm neonates with and without carnitine supplementation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1990;34:501–505.

  13. 13.

    , , , , . Effect of intravenous L-carnitine on the growth parameters and fat metabolism during parenteral nutrition in neonates. J Parenter Enteral Ntr 1990;14:448–453.

  14. 14.

    , , , , . Effect of parenteral L-carnitine supplementation on fat metabolism and nutrition in premature neonates. J Pediatr 1995;126:287–292.

  15. 15.

    , , , , , . Effects of high carnitine supplementation on substrate utilization in low-birth-weight infants receiving total parenteral nutrition. Am J Clin Nutr 1990;52:889–894.

  16. 16.

    , , , , , . Randomized controlled trial of L-carnitine as a nutritional supplement in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1998;78:F185–F188.

  17. 17.

    , , . Total parenteral nutrition and carnitine supplementation practices in premature neonates. A national survey. Pediatr Res 2001;49:398A.

  18. 18.

    , , , , . Role of L-carnitine in apnea of prematurity: a randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics 2002;109:622–626.

  19. 19.

    , , , , . Clinical effects of L-carnitine supplementation on apnea and growth in very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2003;111:477–482.

  20. 20.

    , , . A generalized rank-order method for nonparametric analysis of data from exercise science: a tutorial. Res Q Exerc Sport 1999;70:11–23.

  21. 21.

    , . Comparing two success probabilities. In: Hollander M, Wolfe DA: Nonparametric Statistical Methods. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1999. p. 458–494.

  22. 22.

    . Carnitine in neonatal nutrition. J Child Neurol 1995;10(Suppl 2):S25–S31.

  23. 23.

    , . Carnitine supplementation of parenterally fed neonates (Cochrane review). The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2000, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD000950. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000950.

  24. 24.

    , , , et al. Carnitine supplementation in premature neonates increases plasma total carnitine concentrations (TCC). J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1999;23:S14.

  25. 25.

    , , . Rapid return to birth weight in premature infants receiving parenteral and enteral nutrition supplemented with carnitine. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2003;27:S18–S19.

  26. 26.

    , , , et al. Combined prostaglandin and nitric oxide inhibition produces anatomic remodeling and closure of the ductus arteriosus in the premature newborn baboon. Pediatr Res 2001;50:365–373.

  27. 27.

    , , , et al. Regulation of the activity of caspases by L-carnitine and palmitoylcarnitine. FEBS Lett 2000;478:19–25.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Preliminary results were presented at the New York Perinatal Society, New York, NY, 5/28/02, at the Annual Meeting of the Eastern Society for Pediatric Research, Old Greenwich, CT, 3/23/03, and at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Pediatric Research at Seattle, WA, 5/6/03. We thank all the parents for allowing their babies to participate in this study, the personnel of the pharmacy and the neonatal intensive care unit at Weiler Hospital for their help in conducting the trial. We thank the attendings and fellows, neonatal nurse practitioners, family nurse practitioner and physician assistants who helped recruit patients and conduct the trial. We thank all members of the IRB who participated in the DSMB for this study: Katherine Freeman, MPH, Morri Markowitz, MD, Shlomo Shinnar, MD and Mark Sinnett, PharmD. We also thank Ruth E.K. Stein, MD and Andrew D. Racine, MD for reviewing the first version of the manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

    • Sumati Pande

    Current affiliation of S.P.: Saint Vincent Catholic Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.

Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatrics (S.P., L.P.B., D.E.C., N.V.E.-C.), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Children's Hospital at Montefiore, Bronx, NY, USA

    • Sumati Pande
    • , Luc P Brion
    • , Deborah E Campbell
    •  & Nora V Esteban-Cruciani
  2. Department of Pharmacy (Y.G.), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Children's Hospital at Montefiore, Bronx, NY, USA

    • Yvonne Gayle

Authors

  1. Search for Sumati Pande in:

  2. Search for Luc P Brion in:

  3. Search for Deborah E Campbell in:

  4. Search for Yvonne Gayle in:

  5. Search for Nora V Esteban-Cruciani in:

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luc P Brion.

About this article

Publication history

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211334

Further reading