Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Why Do Neonates Die in Rural Gadchiroli, India? (Part I): Primary Causes of Death Assigned by Neonatologist Based on Prospectively Observed Records

Journal of Perinatology volume 25, pages S29–S34 (2005)Cite this article

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To determine the primary causes of death in home-cared rural neonates by using prospectively kept health records of neonates and a neonatologist's clinical judgment.

STUDY DESIGN:

In the first year (1995 to 1996) of the field trial in Gadchiroli, India, trained village health workers observed neonates in 39 villages by attending home deliveries and making eight home visits during days 0 to 28. The recorded data were validated in the field by a physician. An independent neonatologist assigned the most probable single primary cause of death based on these recorded data.

FINDINGS:

A total of 763 neonates were observed, of whom 40 died (NMR 52.4/1000). The primary causes of death were sepsis/pneumonia 21 (52.5%), asphyxia 8 (20%), prematurity <32 weeks 6 (15%), hypothermia 1 (2.5%), and other/not known 4 (10%). Most of the prematurity or asphyxia deaths occurred during the first 3 days of life. All 21 sepsis/pneumonia deaths occurred during days 4 to 28. A similar picture existed in England before the antibiotic era.

CONCLUSION:

Sepsis/pneumonia is the primary cause in half the deaths in rural neonates cared for at home in Gadchiroli, followed by asphyxia and prematurity. Infections cause a larger proportion of deaths in neonates in the community compared to the reported proportion in hospital-based studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Save the children. State of the World's Newborn: Save the Children. Washington DC; 2001.

  2. National Neonatology Forum. National neonatal–perinatal database. Report for the year 1995, Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi; 1996.

  3. Singh M, Deorari AK, Khajuria RC, Paul VK . A four year study on neonatal morbidity in a New Delhi hospital. Indian J Med Res (B) 1991;94:186–192.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bhakoo ON, Narang A, Kulkarni KN, et al. Neonatal morbidity and mortality in hospital-born babies. Indian Pediatr 1975;12:303–308.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Indian Council of Medical Research. A national collaborative study of identification of high-risk families, mothers and outcome of their off-springs with particular reference to the problem of maternal nutrition, low birth weight, perinatal and infant morbidity and mortality in rural and urban slum communities An ICMR Task Force Study. Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi; 1990.

  6. National Family Health Survey, India, 1992–93. International Institute for Population Sciences, Bombay (1994).

  7. Registrar General, India. Sample registration system, fertility and mortality indicators, 1993. Government of India, New Delhi; 1995.

  8. Kalter HD, Gray RH, Black RE, Gultino SA . Validation of postmortem interviews to ascertain selected causes of death in children. Int J Epidemol 1990;19:380–386.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bang AT, Bang RA, Baitule SB, Deshmukh MD, Reddy MH . Effect of home-based neonatal care and management of sepsis on neonatal mortality: field trial in rural India. Lancet 1999;354:1955–1961.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bang AT, Bang RA, Baitule SB, Deshmukh MD, Reddy MH . Burden of morbidities and the unmet need for health care in rural neonates: a prospective observational study in Gadchiroli, India. Indian Pediatr 2001;38:952–965.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bang AT, Bang RA, Reddy MH, Deshmukh MD . Methods and the baseline situation in the field trial of home-based neonatal care in Gadchiroli, India. J Perinatol 2005;25:S11–S17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. World Health Organization. International Classification of the Diseases. 9th round, Vol. 1. WHO: Geneva; 1977.

  13. Bang AT, Reddy MH, Baitule SB, Deshmukh MD, Bang RA . The incidence of morbidities in a cohort of neonates in rural Gadchiroli, India. J Perinatol 2005;25:S18–S28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. World Health Organization (1996). Essential newborn care: report of a technical working group, 1994. WHO/FRH/MSM/96.13 WHO, Geneva; 1996.

  15. Stoll Barbara J . Neonatal infections: a global perspective. In: Remington JS, Klein JO, editors. Infectious Diseases of Fetus and Newborn Infant. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co. (in press).

  16. Paul VK, Ramani AV . Newborn care at peripheral health facilities. Indian J Pediatr 2000;67:378–382.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sharma BB, Paul VK, Deorari AK, Padmalatha P, Rama G . Profile of sick neonates at a remote district hospital in Himachal Pradesh. Presented at the XVIII Annual Convention of National Neonatology Forum, Vellore, 1998.

  18. Gulati S, Kapoor SK, Anand K, Goswami K, Paul VK . What morbidity is seen in outborn neonates admitted at a sub-district hospital? Presented at the XV Annual Convention of National Neonatology Forum, Patna, 1995.

  19. Bang RA, Bang AT, Baitule M, et al. High prevalence of gynecological diseases in rural Indian women. Lancet 1989;i:85–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Klein JO, Marcy SM . Bacterial sepsis and meningitis. In: Remington JS, Klein JO, editors. Infectious Diseases of the Fetus and Newborn Infant. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1990. p. 601–656.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Leach A, McArdle TF, Banya WAS, et al. Neonatal mortality in a rural area of The Gambia. Ann Trop Pediatr 1999;19:33–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Joint Committee of the Royal College of Obstericians and Gynaecologists and the British Paediatric Association. Neonatal Mortality and Morbidity. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office; 1949.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. SEARCH (Society for Education, Action and Research in Community Health), Gadchiroli, India

    Abhay T Bang MD, MPH, Hanimi M Reddy PhD & Sanjay B Baitule DHMS

  2. Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

    Vinod K Paul MD, PhD

Authors
  1. Abhay T Bang MD, MPH
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vinod K Paul MD, PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hanimi M Reddy PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sanjay B Baitule DHMS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abhay T Bang MD, MPH.

Additional information

The financial support for this work came from The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, The Ford Foundation and Saving Newborn Lives Initiative, Save the Children, USA, and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bang, A., Paul, V., Reddy, H. et al. Why Do Neonates Die in Rural Gadchiroli, India? (Part I): Primary Causes of Death Assigned by Neonatologist Based on Prospectively Observed Records. J Perinatol 25 (Suppl 1), S29–S34 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211269

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211269

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links