Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Effect of Managed Care on Perinatal Transports for the Publicly Funded in Upstate New York

Journal of Perinatology volume 25, pages 79–85 (2005)Cite this article

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To determine if Medicaid Managed Care (MMC) status influences perinatal transfer rates among publicly funded individuals in a well-regionalized area.

STUDY DESIGN:

Perinatal transport rates were determined from deidentified data from the NYS Perinatal Data System (PDS). The predictor of interest was managed care status. Covariates included maternal, newborn, and regional variables.

RESULTS:

The unadjusted probability of maternal transfer was 28% lower among women enrolled in MMC vs those with Medicaid Fee-for-Service (MFFS) (odds ratio (OR)=0.72; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.63 to 0.82). When adjusted for clinical variables influencing maternal transfer and hospital level, women in managed care were 44% less likely to be transferred (OR=0.56; 95% CI: 0.36 to 0.86). Newborns were transferred at similar rates regardless of managed care status.

CONCLUSIONS:

MMC status remains a significant independent predictor for maternal transfer in upstate New York (NY). Despite a well-regionalized organization for perinatal care where pre-existing written protocols for transfer between institutions are established independent of insurance status, managed care may influence decisions on nature and location of care delivery.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hein HA, Brown CJ . Neonatal mortality review: a basis for improving care. Pediatrics 1981;68 (4):504–509.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Durbin DR, Giardino AP, Shaw KN, Harris MC, Silber JH . The effect of insurance status on likelihood of neonatal interhospital transfer. Pediatrics 1997;100 (3):E8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Paneth N, Kiely JL, Wallenstein S, Marcus M, Pakter J, Susser M . Newborn intensive care and neonatal mortality in low-birth-weight infants: a population study. N Eng J Med 1982;307 (3):149–155.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Modanlou HD, Dorchester W, Freeman RK, Rommal C . Perinatal transport to a regional perinatal center in a metropolitan area: maternal versus neonatal transport. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980;138 (8):1157–1164.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Harris TR, Isaman J, Giles HR . Improved neonatal survival through maternal transport. Obstet & Gynecol 1978;52 (3):294–300.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Shi L, Singh DA . Delivering Health Care in America. Gaithersburg: Aspen Publishers; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bronstein JM, Capilouto E, Carlo WA, Haywood JL, Goldenberg RL . Access to neonatal intensive care for low-birthweight infants: the role of maternal characteristics. Am J Public Health 1995;85 (3):357–361.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Himmelstein DU, Woolhandler S, Harnly M, et al. Patient transfers: medical practice as social triage. Am J Public Health 1984;74 (5):494–497.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Schiff RL, Ansell DA, Schlosser JE, Idris AH, Morrison A, Whitman S . Transfers to a public hospital. A prospective study of 467 patients. N Eng J Med 1986;314 (9):552–557.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ansell DA, Schiff RL . Patient dumping. Status, implications, and policy recommendations erratum appears in JAMA 1987 Dec 11;258(22):3259. JAMA 1987;257 (11):1500–1502.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dye TD, Wojtowycz MA, Aubry RH . A cost evaluation of implementing a quality-oriented, regional perinatal data system. J Public Health Manage Pract 1997;3 (2):37–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kotelchuck M . An evaluation of the Kessner Adequacy of Prenatal Care Index and a proposed Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization Index. Am J Public Health 1994;84 (9):1414–1420.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ryan Jr GM . Toward improving the outcome of pregnancy Recommendations for the regional development of perinatal health services. Obstet Gynecol 1975;46 (4):375–384.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shenai JP, Major CW, Gaylord MS, et al. A successful decade of regionalized perinatal care in Tennessee: the neonatal experience. J Perinatol 1991;11 (2):137–143.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hohlagschwandtner M, Husslein P, Klebermass K, Weninger M, Nardi A, Langer M . Perinatal mortality and morbidity. Comparison between maternal transport, neonatal transport and inpatient antenatal treatment. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2001;265 (3):113–118.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Harris Jr BA, Wirtschafter DD, Huddleston JF, Perlis HW . In utero vs neonatal transportation of high-risk perinates: a comparison. Obstet Gynecol 1981;57 (4):496–499.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shlossman PA, Manley JS, Sciscione AC, Colmorgen GH . An analysis of neonatal morbidity and mortality in maternal (in utero) and neonatal transports at 24-34 weeks' gestation. Am J Perinatol 1997;14 (8):449–456.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. CMS. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services June 23, 2003. Available at: http://cms.hhs.gov/medicaid/.

  19. Kaestner R, Dubay L, Kenne G . Medicaid managed care and infant health: a national evaluation. National Bureau of Economic Research. May 2002. Available at; www.nber.org/papers/w8936.

  20. Arad I, Gofin R, Baras M, Bar-Oz B, Peleg O, Epstein L . Neonatal outcome of inborn and transported very-low-birth-weight infants: relevance of perinatal factors. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1999;83 (2):151–157.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. NYS DoH. Monthly Medicaid Managed Care Enrollment Report. June 2003 Available at; http://www.health.state.ny.us/nysdoh/mancare/medicaid/main.htm.

  22. Kohrman C, Hughes J, Andersen R . Medicaid Enrollees in HMOs: A comparative analysis of perinatal outcomes for mothers and newborns in a large Chicago HMO. The Center For Health Administration Studies, University of Chicago. Available at: http://www.changesurfer.com/Hlth/CHMO.html.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Special thanks go to Joe Duckett for his assistance in data base management and to each of the regional data center coordinators for assistance in supplying, formatting, and exporting the data files for compilation. Chris Glantz and Martha Wojtowycz offered valuable constructive criticism.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatrics (Neonatology), University of Rochester Medical Center, Golisano Children's Hospital at Strong, Rochester, NY, USA

    Robert A Sinkin MD, MPH

  2. Department of Community and Preventive Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA

    Susan G Fisher PhD, Ann Dozier RN, PhD & Timothy D Dye PhD

Authors
  1. Robert A Sinkin MD, MPH
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Susan G Fisher PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ann Dozier RN, PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Timothy D Dye PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert A Sinkin MD, MPH.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sinkin, R., Fisher, S., Dozier, A. et al. Effect of Managed Care on Perinatal Transports for the Publicly Funded in Upstate New York. J Perinatol 25, 79–85 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211213

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211213

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links