Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The “Emergent Circumstances” Exception to the Need for Consent: The Texas Supreme Court Ruling in Miller v. HCA

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. Paris JJ, Reardon F . Bad cases make bad law: HCA v. Miller is not a guide for resuscitation of extremely premature newborns. J of Perinatol 2001;21:541–544.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Paris JJ, Schreiber MD . Parental discretion in refusal of treatment for newborns: a real but limited right. Clin Perinatol 1996;23:573–581.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Studdent DM, Mello DM, Brennan TA . Medical malpractice. N Engl J Med 2004;350:283–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Fetus and Newborn, American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists Committee on Obstetric Practice. Perinatal care at the threshold of viability. Pediatrics 1995;96:974–976.

  5. American Academy of Pediatrics. Perinatal care at the threshold of viability. Pediatrics 2002;110:1024–1027.

  6. Doran MW, Vaness-Meehan KA, Margelis LH, et al. Delivery room resuscitation decisions for extremely premature infants. Pediatrics 1998;162:574–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tyson JE, Younes N, Verton J, Wright L . Viability, morbidity, and resource use among newborns of 501–800 g birth weight. JAMA 1996;276:1645–1651.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Allen MC, Donahue PK, Dusman AE . The limits of viability — neonatal outcomes of infants born at 22–25 weeks' gestation. N Engl J Med 1993;329:1597–1601.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hack M, Friedman H, Fanaroff AA . Outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 1996;98:931–937.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hack M, Farnoff AA . Outcomes of extremely immature infants — a perinatal dilemma. N Engl J Med 1993;329:1649–1650.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Costeloe K, Hennessy E, Gibson A, et al. The EPICure study: outcomes to discharge from hospital for infants born at the threshold of viability. Pediatrics 2000;106:659–671.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Paris JJ, Bell AJ . Guarantee my child will be “normal” or stop all treatment. J Perinatol 1993;13:469–472.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Paris JJ . Quadruple Amputee Article. Get in C.V.

  14. Lantos J, Miles SH, Silverstein MD, et al. Survival after cardiopulmonary resuscitation in babies of very low birth weight. N Engl J Med 1988;318:91–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nuremberg Code. Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No 10. Vol. 2:181–182. Washington, DC:US Government Printing Office; 1949.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paris, J., Schreiber, M. & Reardon, F. The “Emergent Circumstances” Exception to the Need for Consent: The Texas Supreme Court Ruling in Miller v. HCA. J Perinatol 24, 337–342 (2004).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links