Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Fetal Macrosomia (≥4500 g): Perinatal Outcome of 231 Cases According to the Mode of Delivery

Journal of Perinatology volume 23, pages 136–141 (2003)Cite this article

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine perinatal complications in infants ≥4500 g according to delivery mode.

STUDY DESIGN: Records of 231 mothers and live cephalic infants weighing ≥4500 g over a 13-year period were retrospectively reviewed. Maternal and perinatal complications were compared in relation to delivery mode.

RESULTS: Vaginal delivery (NVD) was achievable in 168/189 (88.9%) of women allowed to labor, of which 36.9% were operative. The cesarean delivery (CS) rate was 27.3%. The NVD group had a lower incidence of diabetes; however, hypoglycemia and transient tachypnea were more common in the CS group. The frequency of low Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes was similar in both groups. A total of 13 (7.7%) major fetal injuries were documented in the NVD group (arm weakness 3, hematoma 3, clavicular fracture 2, and brachial plexus injury 5). Shoulder dystocia was documented in only 7/13 (53.8%).

CONCLUSION: Vaginal delivery is achievable in 88.9% of pregnancies with infants ≥4500 g allowed to labor, at the expense of a 7.7% risk of perinatal trauma.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wikström I, Axelsson O, Bergström R, Meirik O . Traumatic injury in large-for-date-infants. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1988;67(3):259–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Fetal Macrosomia. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 22. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2000.

  3. Ventura SJ, Martin JA, Curtin SC, Mathews TJ, Park MM . Births: Final data from 1998. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2000;48:1–100.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lipscomb KR, Gegory K, Shaw K . The outcome of macrosomic infants weighing at least 4500 grams: Los Angeles County+University of Southern California experience. Obstet Gynecol 1995;85(4):558–564.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Langer O, Berkus MD, Huff RW, Samueloff A . Shoulder dystocia: Should the fetus weighing ≥4000 grams be delivered by cesarean section? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991;165:831–837.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Blickstein I, Ben-Arie A, Hagay ZJ . Antepartum risks of shoulder dystocia and brachial plexus injury for infants weighing 4,200 g or more. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1998;45(2):77–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Stones RW, Paterson CM, Saunders NJ . Risk factors for major obstetric haemorrhage. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1993;48:15–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. El Madany AA, Jallad KB, Radi FA, Elhamdan H, O'Deh HM . Shoulder dystocia: Anticipation and outcome. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1991;34:7–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lazer S, Biale Y, Mazor M, Lewenthal H, Insler V . Complications associated with the macrosomic fetus. J Reprod Med 1986;31:501–505.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Spellacy WN, Miller S, Winegar A, Peterson PQ . Macrosomia-maternal characteristics and infant complications. Obstet Gynecol 1985;66:158–161.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Boyd ME, Usher RH, McLean FH . Fetal macrosomia: Prediction, risks, proposed management. Obstet Gynecol 1983;61:715–722.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Menticoglou SM, Manning FA, Morrison I, Harman CR . Must macrosomic fetuses be delivered by a cesarean section? A review of outcome for 786 babies >4500 g. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1992;32:100–103.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Berard J, Dufour P, Vinatier D, et al. Fetal macrosomia: Risk factors and outcome. A study of the outcome concerning 100 cases >4500 g. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1998;77(1):51–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. McFarland LV, Raskin M, Daling JR, Benedetti TJ . Erb/Duchenne's palsy: A consequence of fetal macrosomia and method of delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1986;68(6):784–788.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Doc N, Mosberg H, Stern W, Jagani N, Schulman H . Complications in fetal macrosomia. NY State J Med 1984;84:302–305.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nocon JJ, McKenzie DK, Thomas LJ, Hansell RS . Shoulder dystocia: An analysis of risks and obstetric maneuvers. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;168: 1732–1739.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rouse DJ, Owen J . Prophylactic cesarean delivery for fetal macrosomia diagnosed by means of ultrasonography — A Faustian bargain? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181(2):332–338.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sandmire HF, Halloin TJ . Shoulder dystocia: Its incidence and associated risk factors. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1988;26:65–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Carpenter RJ, Deter RL, Park SK . Sonographic estimation of fetal weight. The value of femur length in addition to head and abdomen measurements. Radiology 1984;150:535–540.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. O'Leary JA, Leonetti HB . Shoulder dystocia: Prevention and treatment. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;162:5–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gonik B, Hollyer L, Allen R . Shoulder dystocia recognition: Differences in neonatal risks for injury. Am J Perinatol 1991;8:31–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Jennett RJ, Tarby TJ, Kreinick CJ . Brachial plexus palsy: An old problem revisited. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;166:1673–1677.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Nesbitt TS, Gilbert WM, Herrchen B . Shoulder dystocia and associated risk factors with macrosomic infants born in California. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;172:476–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Acker DB, Sachs BP, Friedman EA . Risk factors for shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 1985;66:762–768.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Baskett TF, Allen AC . Perinatal implications of shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 1995;86:14–17. Gregory KD, Henry OA, Ramicone E, Chan LS, Platt LD . Maternal and infant complications in high and normal weight infants by method of delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1998;92:507–513.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Benedetti TJ, Gabbe SG . Shoulder dystocia. A complication of fetal macrosomia and prolonged second stage of labour with midpelvic delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1978;52:526–529.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lewis DF, Edwards MS, Asrat T, Adair CD, Brooks G, London S . Can shoulder dystocia be predicted? Preconceptive and prenatal factors. J Reprod Med 1998;43:654–658.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bryant DR, Leonardi MR, Landwehr JB, Bottoms SF . Limited usefulness of fetal weight in predicting neonatal brachial plexus injury. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179:686–689.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ecker JL, Greenberg JA, Norwitz ER, Nadel AS, Repke JT . Birth weight as a predictor of brachial plexus injury. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:643–647.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Gherman RB, Goodwin M, Souter I, Neumann K, Ouzounian JG, Paul RH . The McRoberts' maneuver for the alleviation of shoulder dystocia: How successful is it? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;176:656–661.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Gherman RB, Ouzounian JG, Goodwin TM . Brachial plexus palsy: An in utero injury? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180:1303–1307.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Gregory KD, Henry OA, Ramicone E, Chan LS, Platt LD . Maternal and infant complications in high and normal weight infants by method of delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1998;92:507–513.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon

    Anwar H Nassar MD, Ihab M Usta MD, Ali M Khalil MD, Ziad I Melhem MD, Toufic I Nakad MD & Antoine A Abu Musa MD

Authors
  1. Anwar H Nassar MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ihab M Usta MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ali M Khalil MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ziad I Melhem MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Toufic I Nakad MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Antoine A Abu Musa MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nassar, A., Usta, I., Khalil, A. et al. Fetal Macrosomia (≥4500 g): Perinatal Outcome of 231 Cases According to the Mode of Delivery. J Perinatol 23, 136–141 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7210877

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7210877

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links