Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Risk Score for Antenatal Bacterial Vaginosis: BV PIN Points

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Develop a clinical risk score to screen for antenatal bacterial vaginosis (BV), irrespective of symptoms.

STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study of 913 pregnant women with last menstrual periods between January 30, 1995 and February 22, 1997. BV was evaluated by Nugent-scored vaginal smears (scores of 7 to 10 considered positive) between 24 and 29 weeks' gestation. Forty-four potential risk factors were assessed.

RESULTS: 17.8% of women had BV, of whom 22% were screened for BV by the usual care provider. Logistic regression–adjusted analyses found six predictors: vaginal pH>4.5 (OR=11.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] [7.8, 17.2]); black race (OR=1.9, 95% CI [1.3, 2.8]); condom use during pregnancy (OR=1.6, 95% CI [1.0, 2.5]); antenatal BV (OR=1.7, 95% CI [1.0, 2.8]); absence of sperm on smear (OR=1.7, 95% CI [1.0, 2.9]); and no history of sexually transmitted diseases (OR=1.6, 95% CI [1.0, 2.5]). Risk score weights were 5 for an elevated vaginal pH and 1 otherwise. The sensitivity and specificity of screening women with scores ≥4 were both 77%; this would involve screening 33% of patients.

CONCLUSION: Approximately 80% of our BV cases were asymptomatic, emphasizing the need for objective risk assessment. Using six factors, clinicians can identify pregnant women at risk for BV.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hill GB . The microbiology of bacterial vaginosis Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993 169: 450–4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bump RC, Buesching WJ . Bacterial vaginosis in virginal and sexually active adolescent females: evidence against sexual transmission Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988 158: 935–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Spiegel CA, Amsel R, Eschenbach D, Schoenknecht F, Homes KK . Anaerobic bacteria in nonspecific vaginitis N Engl J Med 1980 303: 601–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Amsel R, Toeen PA, Spiegel CA, Chen KCS, Eschenbach D, Holmes KK . Nonspecific vaginitis. Diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations Am J Med 1983 74: 14–22

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Embree J, Caliando JJ, McCormack WM . Nonspecific vaginitis among women attending a sexually transmitted diseases clinic Sex Transm Dis 1984 11: 81–4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Eschenbach DA, Hillier S, Critchlow C, Stevens C, DeRouen T, Holmes KK . Diagnosis and clinical manifestations of bacterial vaginosis Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988 158: 819–28

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Martius J, Krohn MA, Hillier SL, Stamm WE, Holmes KK, Eschenbach DA . Relationships of vaginal Lactobacillus species, cervical Chlamydia trachomatis, and bacterial vaginosis to preterm birth Obstet Gynecol 1988 71: 89–95

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Riduan JM, Hillier SL, Utomo B, Wiknjosastro G, Linnan M, Kandun N . Bacterial vaginosis and prematurity in Indonesia: association in early and late pregnancy Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993 169: 175–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. McGregor JA, French JI, Jones W et al. Bacterial vaginosis is associated with prematurity and vaginal fluid mucinase and sialidase: results of a controlled trial of topical clindamycin cream Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994 170: 1048–60

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Meis PJ, Goldenberg RL, Mercer B et al. The preterm prediction study: significance of vaginal infections Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995 173: 1231–5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hay PE, Lamont RF, Taylor-Robinson D, Morgan DJ, Ison C, Pearson J . Abnormal bacterial colonisation of the genital tract and subsequent preterm delivery and late miscarriage BMJ 1994 308: 295–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Holst E, Goffeng AR, Andersch B . Bacterial vaginosis and vaginal microorganisms in idiopathic premature labor and association with pregnancy outcome J Clin Microbiol 1994 32: 176–86

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. McGregor JA, French JI, Parker R et al. Prevention of premature birth by screening and treatment for common genital tract infections: results of a prospective controlled evaluation Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995 173: 157–67

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gravett MG, Nelson HP, DeRouen T et al. Independent association of bacterial vaginosis and Chlamydia trachomatis infection with adverse pregnancy outcome JAMA 1986 256: 1899–1903

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. McDonald HM, O'Loughlin JA, Jolley P, Vigneswaran R, McDonald PJ . Vaginal infection and preterm labor Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991 98: 427–35

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Krohn MA, Hillier SL, Nugent RP et al. The genital flora of women with intraamniotic infection J Infect Dis 1995 171: 1475–80

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hillier SL, Martius J, Krohn M, Kiviat N, Holmes KK, Eschenbach DA . A case–control study of chorioamnionic infection and histologic chorioamnionitis in prematurity N Engl J Med 1988 319: 972–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. McGregor JA, French JI . Prevention of preterm birth NEJM 1998 339: 1858–9 (Letter)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Goldenberg RL, Rouse DJ . Prevention of preterm birth NEJM 1998 339: 1860 (Letter)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Savitz DA, Dole N, Williams J et al. Determinants of participation in an epidemiological study of preterm delivery Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 1999 13: 114–25

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pastore LM, Royce RA, Jackson TP, Thorp Jr JM, Savitz DA, Kreaden US . Association between bacterial vaginosis and fetal fibronectin at 24–29 weeks' gestation Obstet Gynecol 1999 93: 117–23

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL . Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by standard method of Gram stain interpretation J Clin Microbiol 1991 29: 297–301

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Foxman B, Aral SO, Holmes KK . Interrelationships among douching practices, risky sexual practices, and history of self-reported sexually transmitted diseases in an urban population Sex Transm Dis 1998 25: 90–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang J, Thomas AG, Leybovich E . Vaginal douching and adverse health effects: a meta-analysis Am J Public Health 1997 87: 1207–11

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Rosenberg MJ, Phillips RS, Holmes MD . Vaginal douching: who and why? J Reprod Med 1991 36: 753–8

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Goldenberg RL, Klebanoff MA, Nugent R, Krohn MA, Hillier S, Andrews WW . Bacterial colonization of the vagina during pregnancy in four ethnic groups Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996 174: 1618–21

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Royce RA, Jackson TP, Thorp Jr JM et al. Race/ethnicity, vaginal flora patterns, and pH during pregnancy Sex Transm Dis 1999 26: 96–102

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nilsson U, Hellberg D, Shoubnikova M, Nilsson S, Mardh PA . Sexual behavior risk factors associated with bacterial vaginosis and Chlamydia trachomatis infection Sex Transm Dis 1997 24: 241–6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ . The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve Radiology 1982 143: 29–36

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Glantz JC . Screening and treatment of bacterial vaginosis during pregnancy: a model for determining benefit Am J Perinat 1997 14: 487–90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Schwebke JR, Hillier SL, Sobel JD, McGregor JA, Sweet RL . Validity of the vaginal Gram stain for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis Obstet Gynecol 1996 88: 573–6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Klebanoff M, Carey JC . Metronidazole did not prevent preterm birth in asymptomatic women with bacterial vaginosis Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999 180: S2 (SMFM Abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Livengood CH, McGregor JA, Soper DE, Newton E, Thomason JL . Bacterial vaginosis: efficacy and safety of intravaginal metronidazole treatment Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994 170: 759–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. French JI, McGregor JA . Bacterial vaginosis: history, epidemiology, microbiology, sequelae, diagnosis, and treatment In: Borchadt KA, Noble MA, editors. Sexually Transmitted Diseases: Epidemiology, Pathology, Diagnosis, and Treatment Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press 1997 p 3–39

  35. Platz-Christensen JJ, Pernevi P, Hagmar B, Andersson E, Brandberg A, Wiqvist N . A longitudinal follow-up of bacterial vaginosis during pregnancy Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1993 72: 99–102

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Gratacos E, Figueras F, Barranco M et al. Spontaneous recovery of bacterial vaginosis during pregnancy is not associated with an improved perinatal outcome Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1998 77: 37–40

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Laboratory Corporation of America (Burlington, NC) for Gram staining. We thank the PIN Study staff: project manager, Jude F. Williams; interviewer coordinator, Teresa Sanfelippo; and the clinic site coordinators, Barbara Eucker and Anne Carter. Statistical programming assistance was provided by Quinhong Yang. We greatly appreciate the cooperation of the clinic staff, particularly, Peter Morris, Ida Dawson, Cathi Weatherly-Jones, Juan Granados, Thad McDonald, and Sara Caviness.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This study was supported by the North Carolina Healthy Start Foundation; grant HD28684 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health; cooperative agreements S455-16/16-17 through the Association of Schools of Public Health/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U64/CCU412273 through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; and funds from the Wake Area Health Education Center in Raleigh, NC, USA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pastore, L., Thorp, J., Royce, R. et al. Risk Score for Antenatal Bacterial Vaginosis: BV PIN Points. J Perinatol 22, 125–132 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7210654

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7210654

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links