Nature's peer-review trial began at the start of last month. Authors whose manuscripts are sent for peer review can choose to have their submissions posted on a preprint server for open comments, in parallel with the conventional peer-review process. Anyone in the field can then post comments, provided they are prepared to identify themselves.
Since the start of the trial, 20 submitted manuscripts have been posted on the trial's website (http://blogs.nature.com/nature/peerreview/trial) encompassing a host of disciplines including immunology, applied physics, neuroscience, astronomy, ecology and structural biology. Twelve comments on these manuscripts have been published on the site.
Nature is also hosting a peer-review debate on all aspects of the topic, highlighting a range of views, practices and suggestions about systems, quality, value, ethics, new technical approaches derived from the Internet, and individual perspectives. The 22 articles in the debate can be seen at http://www.nature.com/nature/peerreview/debate.
Readers are encouraged to join the commenting forum at http://blogs.nature.com/nature/peerreview/debate/comments. So far, 47 comments have been published; we welcome further contributions.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Peer-review trial and debate. Nature 442, xiii (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/7099xiiid