Sir,
Most eye casualty departments provide a service far in excess of their capacity;1, 2 and review patients having non-urgent problems more appropriate for primary care or outpatient clinics.2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Historically, the accident and emergency (A&E) department at the Wolverhampton Eye Infirmary (WEI) has provided an open access casualty service from 0900–2100, on all days of the week. All patients are triaged at presentation by a nurse practitioner using the local triage practice. We studied the current utilization of our eye casualty services with special emphasis on the out-of-hours attendance.
Methods
All new patients attending the casualty at WEI over a 4-week period (1–31 October 2004) had information collated on: demographic data, referral source, presentation time, symptom duration, diagnoses, and management. Out of hours was defined as after 1700 till 2100.
Results
Out of 2546 patient contacts in the study period, 1597 patients were new and 949 patients had review appointments. Data collection was complete for 1295 (81%) new patients.
The mean daily new patient attendance rate (+/− SD) in the eye casualty was 50 +/− 14 during this period. This was lower on the weekend (Saturday: 39 +/− 7, Sunday: 29 +/− 5).
Time of presentation, duration of symptoms, and diagnosis are shown in Figures 1 and 2 and Table 1, respectively.
Seven hundred and thirty-eight patients (57%) were minor emergencies and discharged at first attendance by nurse practitioners. Four hundred and seventy-nine patients (37%) had further review appointments in casualty, 11 (1%) were admitted for immediate management and 67 (5%) were redirected for management in outpatient, laser, or minor procedures.
Discussion
The demand for out- of -hours emergency care was examined and the number of new patients that registered out-of-hours was much lower than during the regular hours. Furthermore, over half of these patients were found to have had symptoms for longer than 12 h with only three patients needing admission and urgent treatment.
The number of self referrals in our patient group was high as in previous studies (85% versus 58–89%).2, 5 This reflects the historic availability of an open access casualty at WEI and to a lesser extent, the unavailability of direct access dedicated eye casualty after hours in surrounding ophthalmic departments.9
Based on our findings, the eye casualty opening hours have now been reduced to 0900–1700 all days of the week with after hours cover provided by the on-call doctors following review at the Acute Hospital A&E. The authors are aware that limiting the eye casualty hours may influence the utilization of emergency care services by patients with non urgent health problems after hours.10 We also revised the triage criteria with the revised criteria having shortened symptom durations.
In conclusion, a dedicated out-of-hours eye casualty seems to have a limited role We recommend such a reorganization to other units only after the respective units have similarly examined the demand for eye care in their casualty as part of the reorganization process.
References
Vernon SA . Analysis of all new cases seen in a busy regional centre ophthalmic casualty department during 24-week period. JR Soc Med 1983; 76: 279–282.
Fenton S, Jackson E, Fenton M . An audit of the ophthalmic division of the accident and emergency department of the Royal Victoria Eye and Ear Hospital, Dublin. Ir Med J 2001; 94: 265–266.
Edwards RS . Ophthalmic emergencies in a district general hospital casualty department. Br J Ophthalmol 1987; 71: 938–942.
Jones NP, Hayward JM, Khaw PT, Claoue CM, Elkington AR . Function of an ophthalmic ‘accident and emergency’ department: results of a six month survey. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986; 292: 188–190.
Bhopal RS, Parkin DW, Gillie RF, Han KH . Pattern of ophthalmological accidents and emergencies presenting to hospitals. J Epidemiol Community Health 1993; 47: 382–387.
Chiapella AP, Rosenthal AR . One year in an eye casualty clinic. Br J Ophthalmol 1985; 69: 865–870.
Windle J, Mackway-Jones K . Don't throw triage out with the bathwater. Emerg Med J 2003; 20: 119–120.
Banerjee S, Beatty S, Tyagi A, Kirkby GR . The role of ophthalmic triage and the nurse practitioner in an eye-dedicated casualty department. Eye 1998; 12: 880–882.
Kulu-Glasgow I, Delnoij D, de Bakker D . Self referral in a gate keeping system: patient's reasons for skipping the general-practitioner. Health Policy 1998; 45: 221–238.
van Uden CJT, Winkens RAG, Wesseling GJ, Crebolder HFJM, van Schayck CP . Use of out of hours services: a comparison between two organisations. Emerg Med J 2003; 20: 184–187.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Proprietary interests: none
Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on the Eye website (http://www.nature.com/eye)
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kadyan, A., Sandramouli, S. & Caruana, P. Utilization of an ophthalmic casualty — a critical review. Eye 21, 441–442 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6702609
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6702609
This article is cited by
-
Usability of an artificially intelligence-powered triage platform for adult ophthalmic emergencies: a mixed methods study
Scientific Reports (2023)
-
Patterns of attendances to the hospital emergency eye care service: a multicentre study in England
Eye (2022)
-
Eye casualty services in London
Eye (2013)