Clinical practice guidelines in cancer: the European perspective

This article has been updated

Change history

  • 16 November 2011

    This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as noted at publication

References

  1. Bailar JC (1997) The promise and problems of meta-analysis [editorial; comment] [see comments]. N Engl J Med 337: 559–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dickman PW, Hakulinen T, Luostarinen T, Pukkala E, Sankila R, Soderman B and Teppo L (1999) Survival of cancer patients in Finland 1955–1994 [see comments]. Acta Oncol 38: 1–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer (1998). Recommendations pour la pratique clinique en cancérologie [cédérom], FNCLCC, John Libbey EUROTEXT: Paris

  4. Langmark F (1997). Cancer in Norway: the cancer registry of Norway, Norwegian Cancer Registry: Oslo 98–99

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lee SJ, Earle CC and Weeks JC (2000) Outcomes research in oncology: history, conceptual framework, and trends in the literature. J Natl Cancer Inst 92: 195–204

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. LeLorier J, Gregoire G, Benhaddad A, Lapierre J and Derderian F (1997) Discrepancies between meta-analyses and subsequent large randomized, controlled trials [see comments]. N Engl J Med 337: 536–542

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Marshall E (2000) Biomedical ethics. Penn report, agency heads home in on clinical research [news]. Science 288: 1558–1559

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Organization of European Cancer Institutes (2000) 20th anniversary report 1979–1999. Brno, Czech Republic

  9. Quinn MJ, Martinez-Garcia C and Berrino F (1998) Variations in survival from breast cancer in Europe by age and country, 1978–1989. Eur J Cancer 34: 2204–2211

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L, Verweij J, Van Glabbeke M, van Oosterom AT, Christian MC and Gwyther SG (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada [see comments]. J Natl Cancer Inst 92: 205–216

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. United Kingdom Co-ordinating Committee on Cancer Research (2000) UKCCCR guidelines for the use of cell lines in cancer research. Br J Cancer 82: 1495–1509

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Storme, G. Clinical practice guidelines in cancer: the European perspective. Br J Cancer 84, 6–7 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2001.1773

Download citation

Search

Quick links