Abstract
We performed a preliminary investigation into which hospitals would benefit frominvestment and development, and which should have services restricted, with respect to the implementation of the Calman–Hine strategy of specialist cancer care. A retrospective study approach was used implementing uniform definitions for colon, rectal, breast, melanoma, bladder and ovarian cancers. A total of 14 527 cases registered by the East Anglian cancer registry and diagnosed between 1989 and 1993 were included. The cases were analysed in two age groups (< 75, 75+ years) and two hospital groups: group 1, those treated at hospitals with radiotherapy and oncology departments; group 2, other district general hospitals. Adjusted hazard ratios derived from Cox’s proportional hazards model and adjusted conditional survival curves were presented. We found that after adjustment for age, sex and tumour stage at diagnosis, survival up to 5 years after diagnosis was usually worse in group 2 hospitals and significantly so for patients aged < 75 years with breast, ovarian and rectal tumours. Hospital workload produced little significant effect independently from hospital group. Analysing the selected cancer sites using uniform definitions and consistent staging supports the view that the strategy proposed in the Calman–Hine report is likely to be beneficial, but particular priority for change should be given to younger patients with breast, ovarian and rectal tumours. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
Change history
16 November 2011
This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as noted at publication
References
Cox DR (1972) Regression models and life tables. J R Stat Soc 34: 187–220
Department of Health (1994). Consultative document: a policy framework for commissioning cancer services, Department of Health: London
Hermanek P, Sobin LH (1987) UICC International Union Against Cancer. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours, 4th edn., Springer-Verlag: Berlin
Nieto FJ and Coresh J (1996) Adjusting survival curves for confounders: a review and a new method. Am J Epidemiol 143: 1059–1068
Selby P, Gillis C and Haward R (1996) Benefits from specialised cancer care. Lancet 348: 313–318
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Stockton, D., Davies, T. Multiple cancer site comparison of adjusted survival by hospital of treatment: an East Anglian study. Br J Cancer 82, 208–212 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.1999.0901
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.1999.0901