Novel compounds with antiangiogenic and antiproliferative potency for growth control of testicular germ cell tumours

Backround: Testicular germ cell tumour (TGCT) is the most common cause of death from solid tumours in young men and especially for platinum-refractory patients novel treatment approaches are urgently needed. Using an in silico screening approach for the detection of novel cancer drugs with inhibitory effects on the tyrosine kinase activity of growth factors (e.g., VEGFR, PDGFR), we identified two compounds (HP-2 and HP-14) with antiangiogenic and antiproliferative potency, which were evaluated in endothelial cell models and TGCT cells. Results: HP-2 and HP-14 effectively inhibited the growth of VEGFR-2-expressing TGCT cell lines (Tera-1, Tera-2 and 2102EP) and endothelial cell models, while they failed to supress the growth of VEGFR-2-lacking tumour cells. cDNA-microarrays revealed an inhibition of the expression of several growth factor receptors and related signal transduction molecules. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-induced cell migration was also potently inhibited. Cell cycle-regulating proteins such as p21 and p27 were upregulated, leading to an S-phase arrest. Additional in vivo evaluations confirmed the antiangiogenic potency and good tolerability of the novel substances. Conclusion: Our data show that the identified novel compounds inhibit the growth of TGCT cells and decrease angiogenic microvessel formation. The mode of action involves cell cycle arresting effects and changes in the expression pattern of several angiogenic genes. The novel compounds may qualify as new candidates for targeted treatment of TGCT and merit further evaluation.

Testicular germ cell tumour (TGCT) is the most common malignancy in the group of young men between 20 and 40 years with increasing incidence during the last 30 years in the majority of industrialised countries (Huyghe et al, 2003). Approximately 95% of malignant tumours of the testis are germ cell tumours (Bosl and Motzer, 1997). Germ cell tumours are classified as seminomatous or nonseminomatous and originate from carcinoma in situ, also known as testicular intraepithelial neoplasia (Looijenga and Oosterhuis, 1999). Today 490% of all patients with metastatic germ cell cancer can be cured after receiving standard-dose, cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy (Kollmannsberger et al, 2006). However, a small group of patients who relapse after cisplatin-based chemotherapy or from complete remission have a poor prognosis (Hussain et al, 2008). Therefore, it is very important to identify new treatment options for as much as to develop therapies with minimal side effects to improve the quality of life of these mostly young patients (Schrader et al, 2009).
Angiogenesis, the formation of new blood vessels, is a complex process that includes endothelial cell proliferation, vessel sprout-ing, vascular permeability and remodelling and maturation of emerging vessels. This process, mainly driven by the vascular endothelial growth factor VEGF/VEGFR-system, has a crucial role in tumour growth, development and progression (Loges et al, 2009). The necessary requirement for the expansion and metastasis of tumour cells is the connection to the vascular system of the surrounding tissue. This tumour angiogenesis will supply the tumour with sufficient oxygen and nutrients and is essential for tumour survival (Folkman, 1971). One of the most important signals for induction of angiogenesis is the VEGF. Vascular endothelial growth factor represents a family of five glycoproteins (VEGF-A -VEGF-E) in which VEGF-A (VEGF) is thought to be the most important angiogenic factor of this family. It binds to three structurally highly related tyrosine kinase receptors VEGFR-1 (Flt-1), VEGFR-2 (KDR/Flk-1) and VEGFR-3 (Flt-4) with specific functions: the binding of VEGF to VEGFR-1 leads to hematopoietic cell development, whereas VEGFR-3 is mainly involved in lymphatic endothelial cell development (Folkman, 1971;Ferrara et al, 2003). VEGFR-2 regulates the vascular endothelial cell development and is thought to be the primary receptor involved in angiogenesis. The expression of VEGFR-2 and VEGF is directly correlated with microvessel density and metastasis in many solid tumours (Boocock et al, 1995;Takahashi et al, 1996;Fox et al, 2004;Höpfner et al, 2008). This also holds true for germ cell tumours, in which the expression of VEGF correlates with increased angiogenic activity, disease progression and increased tumour microvessel density (Viglietto et al, 1996). Inhibition of the VEGF/VEGFR system has already become a clinically relevant strategy for innovative treatment of several urological tumours (Krause and Van Etten, 2005;Chieffi, 2007). However, information on the suitability for treatment of germ cell tumours remains to be determined.
In our study, we searched for novel antiangiogenic TKIs by using an in silico screening approach to identify yet unknown compounds with putative antiangiogenic and antiproliferative properties. The clinically relevant VEGFR TKI vatalanib was used as lead structure (Wood et al, 2000). An 'inhouse' database with approximately four million compounds was verified for two-and three-dimensional similarity to vatalanib. The search revealed 15 compounds with different antiproliferative and antiangiogenic potencies. Table 1 shows the two-dimensional similarities of 15 identified novel compounds. The purpose of this study was to determine and analyse the antiangiogenic, antimigratory and antiproliferative potency of the two most potent antiangiogenic and antiproliferative compounds, named HP-2 and HP-14. Evidence for the specific VEGFR-2 inhibition by the novel compounds in terms of binding properties and VEGFR-2-related inhibition of tumour cell growth was already shown in a previous study (Schmidt et al, 2008).

Drugs
Vatalanib was obtained from LC Laboratories (Woburn, MA, USA). HP-2 and HP-14 were purchased from Ambinter (Paris, France). Stock solutions were prepared in DMSO, stored at À20 1C and diluted to the final concentration in fresh media before each experiment. In all experiments, the final DMSO concentration was o0.2%.

Measurement of growth inhibition
Drug-induced changes in cell numbers were evaluated by crystal violet staining, as described (Gillies et al, 1986). In brief, cells in 96-well plates were fixed with 1% glutaraldehyde and stained with 0.1% crystal violet. The unbound dye was removed by washing with water. Bound crystal violet was solubilised with 0.2% Triton-X-100. Light extinction that increases linearly with the cell number was analysed at 570 nm using an ELISA-Reader.

Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT -PCR)
Total RNA was extracted using RNeasy Mini Kit following the manufacturer's instructions (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The concentration and purity were measured by absorption spectrophotometry at 260 and 280 nm. The cDNA was synthesised from 2 mg of total RNA using the Superscript RT kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol.  Table 2 (Dias et al, 2000;Basciani et al, 2002;Chung et al, 2005).

Migration assay
EA.hy926 endothelial cells were grown to confluence in six-well plates. After serum starvation for 24 h, the monolayer was scratched with a pipette tip along a ruler. Endothelial cell growth medium was replenished with the new medium containing 10 ng ml -1 VEGF-A (VEGF-A 165 Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) and 10 mM of HP-2 or HP-14, respectively. Images were taken with Kappa digital camera (Kappa opto-electronics, Gleichen, Germany) after 24 h of incubation at 37 1C in a humidified atmosphere (5% CO 2 ). Cell migration was quantified by using Tscratch software (Gebäck et al, 2009).

DNA-microarray
Total cellular RNA was extracted from cells using ArrayGrade Total RNA Isolation Kit (SABiosciences, Frederick, MD, USA). RNA concentration was measured by absorption spectrophotometry (GeneQuant, Biochrom, Cambridge, UK). Using the True-Labeling AMP 2.0 amplification kit (SABiosciences), the mRNA was reversely transcribed into cDNA and converted to biotin-labeled cRNA using biotin-16-UTP (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) by in vitro transcription. cRNA samples were purified with an ArrayGrade cRNA cleanup kit (SABiosciences). Thereafter, the probes were hybridised to the pretreated Oligo GEArray Human Angiogenesis arrays (OHS-024, SABiosciences), which cover 113 angiogenesis-related genes plus controls or to Human Cancer Pathway Finder arrays (OHS-033, SABiosciences). After several washing steps, array spots binding cRNA were detected by chemiluminescence staining. Image acquisition was performed using X-ray films and a digital scanner. Spots were analysed and converted to numerical data by using the GEArray Expression Analysis Suite software (SABiosciences). Data evaluation included background correction (substraction of minimum value) and normalisation to reference genes. The cut off for upregulation was set at a 1.5-fold increase in the ratio of genes in the treated samples, whereas downregulation was determined as the 0.5-fold expression of genes in the treated samples.

Cell cycle analysis by flow cytometry
Cell cycle analysis was performed by a modified method of Fried et al (1976). Cells were seeded at a concentration of 10 5 cells ml -1 and treated with 10 mM HP-14 for 24 h. Cells were then washed with PBS and fixed in PBS/formaldehyde 2% (vol/vol) on ice for 30 min. Afterwards cells were incubated in ice cold ethanol/PBS (2 : 1 vol/vol) overnight at À20 1C and pelleted. Resuspension in PBS containing 40 mg ml -1 RNase A followed. After incubation for 30 min at 37 1C, cells were pelleted again and resuspended in PBS containing 50 mg ml -1 propidium iodide. Cells were then analysed on a FACSCalibur flow cytometer using CellQuestPro Software (BD Biosciences, Heidelberg, Germany) and FlowJo Software (Tree star, Ashland, OR, USA).

Chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) angiogenesis assay
Fertilised chicken eggs (Lohmann Tierzucht, Cuxhaven, Germany) were bred in an incubator at 37 1C in constant humidity for 3 days. After day 3, a square window was cut into the shell of each egg, and 5 ml of albumen was removed to allow detachment of the developing chorioallantoic membrane from the shell. The window was sealed with tape, and the eggs were bred in the incubator for additional 7 days. On day 11, the tapes were removed and the CAMs were treated with the different compounds as described (Ribatti et al, 1997). In brief, a small ring was placed onto the CAM and either 100 ml of PBS (negative control) or 100 ml of PBS containing HP-2 and HP-14 were added. After 48 h of incubation, the CAMs were examined and in vivo pictures were taken using a stereomicroscope equipped with a Kappa digital camera system. For more detailed investigations the CAMs were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, dissected and transferred to glass slides and analysed under the microscope (Zeiss Axioplan, Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) equipped with a MBF Bioscience camera system (MBF Bioscience, Williston, VT, USA). The response to drug treatment was assessed by examining the alterations of the CAM differing from the controls.

VEGFR expression
The expression of VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2 was examined in endothelial cells (HUVEC and EA.hy926) and in the urologic tumour cell lines Tera-1, Tera-2, 2102EP and A498. Reverse transcription -PCR revealed a robust expression of VEGFR-2 in TCGT cells (Tera-1, Tera-2 and 2102EP) and in the two endothelial cell models. However, in the additionally tested renal cell carcinoma cells (A498) no appreciable expression of VEGFR-2 was detected. No expression of VEGFR-1 was detected in A498 and Tera-1 cells ( Figure 1).

Growth inhibitory effects
To determine the growth inhibitory effects of HP-2 and HP-14 on tumour and endothelial cells, crystal violet staining was performed after 48 h of continuous incubation with rising concentrations of either compound. Both, HP-2 as well as HP-14 led to time-and dose-dependent growth inhibition of HUVEC, EA.hy926 and TGCT cells (Tera-1, Tera-2 and 2102EP) of up to 480%. Interestingly, VEGFR-lacking A498 cells did not respond to HP-treatment ( Figure 2). Compared with the growth inhibitory effects of the lead structure vatalanib, the antiproliferative effects of our novel compounds were much more pronounced, especially in the TGCT cells. Unspecific cytotoxicity of HP-2 and HP-14 was excluded by measurement of LDH-release into the supernatant of treated cells. Neither endothelial cells nor TGCT cells showed an increase in LDH release 41% as compared with untreated control cells, revealing that unspecific cytotoxicity does not account for the observed antiproliferative effects of the two compounds (data not shown).

Gene expression profiling
To shed light on the pathways modulated by the novel compounds two different cDNA-microarrays were performed. The human VEGFR-1 VEGFR-2 GAPDH A 4 9 8 T e r a -1 T e r a -2 2 1 0 2 Figure 1 Expression of VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2 in endothelial and urologic tumour cells. The TGCT cell lines Tera-1, Tera-2 and 2102EP show a strong expression of VEGFR-2 and a weak expression of VEGFR-1. By contrast urologic A498 tumour cells did not express any of the two receptors. Both endothelial cell models (EA.hy926 and HUVEC) showed the expected robust expression of VEGFR-1 and -2. angiogenesis array was performed with endothelial cells (HUVEC) and TGCT cells (Tera-1) to profile the expression of 113 genes involved in angiogenesis after treatment with HP-14 (15 mM for 48 h). The human cancer pathway finder array was used to determine the expression pattern of genes involved in cancer relevant pathways such as transformation and tumourigenesis of TGCT cells (Tera-1). On HP-14 treatment up-or downregulation of 35 genes involved in angiogenesis were detected in HUVEC cells (Table 3). The angiogenesis-promoting genes Tie-2 and IL8 showed a strong downregulation, while the antiangiogenic regulator endostatin was markedly upregulated.
In Tera-1 cells, HP-14 induced the modulation of 40 genes responsible for cellular functions such as growth, signal transduction, cell cycle regulation and angiogenesis (  Both, in endothelial as well as in TGCT cells HP-14 induced a marked downregulation of VEGFR-2 (KDR/Flk-1). Moreover, in Tera-1 cells the VEGFR-2 downstream signalling transduction molecule AKT1 was suppressed, suggesting a functional role of HP-14 in these processes.
The Tables 3 and 4 summarise the findings on up-and downregulation of angiogensis-and cancer pathway-specific genes of endothelial and TGCT cells, respectively.

MAPK-inhibition by novel compounds
Inhibition of ERK1/2 phosphorylation was examined in EA.hy926 cells. Cells were incubated with 0, 5 and 10 mM of HP-2 or HP-14 for 24 h. Both compounds inhibited the phosphorylation of ERK1/2 (Figure 3), whereas the total amount of ERK protein remained unaffected. Maximal effects were observed with 10 mM of HP-14.
At equimolar concentration HP-2 and HP-14 show stronger inhibition of ERK1/2 phosphorylation as compared with vatalanib. Comparable results were obtained in the TGCT cell lines (data not shown).

Drug-induced cell cycle arrest
Expression of the two major cell cycle regulators, the cyclindependent kinase inhibitors p21 waf/cip1 and p27 Kip1 , were examined by western blotting. Incubation of Tera-1 and EA.hy 926 cells with HP-2, HP-14 or vatalanib for 24 h resulted in an increase in p21 waf/cip1 and p27 Kip1 expression, suggesting that the mode of action of the HP-substances involves cell cycle arresting effects ( Figures 4A and B). To confirm these findings flow cytometric cell cycle analyses was performed on Tera-1 cells. In this study, HP-14 treatment led to an arrest of cells in the S-phase of the cell cycle, accompanied by a respective decrease in the proportion of cells in the G2-phase, whereas no significant increase in apoptotic cells in the SubG1 population was detected ( Figure 4C).

Effects on cell migration
Cell migration is necessary for endothelial angiogenesis as well as for cancer cell invasion and metastasis. Performing scratch wound assays we determined the antimigratory effects of HP-2 and HP-14 on endothelial cell migration. EA.hy926 cell monolayers were serum starved for 24 h. Thereafter the monolayers were scratched with a pipette tip and scratch closure was stimulated by VEGF (10 ng ml -1 ). HP-2 and HP-14 pretreated cells showed a decreased migration as compared with VEGF-stimulated control cells. The migratory inhibition of HP-compounds amounted to  Figure 5).

In vivo evaluation of HP-2-and HP-14-induced inhibition of angiogenesis
Antiangiogenic effects of HP-2 and HP-14 on microvessel formation of the developing CAM was assessed after 48 h of incubation. The capillary plexus and the immature larger supplying vessels (arteries and veins) were visible at the beginning of the experiment (Figures 6A -C). After 2 days, the PBS-treated control CAM ( Figure 6D) showed mature large vessels (arrow) and a pronounced capillary plexus. By contrast, treatment with HP-2 (10 mM) led to huge non-perfused areas of the CAM. Especially the smaller supplying vessels were influenced by HP-2 treatment ( Figure 6E), whereas no obvious influence was observed on the capillary plexus (star). HP-14 had the strongest effect on the CAM vasculature. HP-14 (10 mM, 48 h) led to an increase in non-perfused areas and to an obvious degeneration of the vasculature and the capillary plexus ( Figures 6F and I).

DISCUSSION
Regardless of the generally successful platinum-based treatment possibilities for patients with metastatic testicular germ cell cancer, there are still subgroups of patients whose prognosis is poor. For instance, in patients with strongly reduced initial creatinine clearance adequate high-dose chemotherapy is problematic or even impossible because of the increasing risk of a further loss of renal function. Another problem is the poor response of recurrent tumours to second-line therapy and the dose limitation, leading to discontinuation of second salvage treatment with high-dose polychemotherapy before achieving the eradication of the advanced tumours. So in case of patients with primary platinumresistant and/or recurrent tumours or those that are unable to undergo systemic cisplatin-based chemotherapy, alternative treatment are urgently needed (Lorch et al, 2007;Schrader et al, 2009). Searching for novel non-platinum-based treatment approaches, we analysed and characterised the antiangiogenic and antiproliferative effects of two novel small molecule inhibitors, HP-2 and HP-14. The compounds were derived from in silico screenings using the clinically relevant VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor vatalanib as the lead structure.
The rationale for choosing a VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor as a lead structure was deduced from findings that proangiogenic VEGF is often increased in patients with TGCTs and increases metastatic potential of TGCTs (Fukuda et al, 1999;Aigner et al, 2003;Bentas et al, 2003). Moreover, the expression of VEGFR-2, which is the most important angiogenic growth factor receptor, has been implicated in the pathogenesis of testicular germ cell (Jones et al, 2000;Devouassoux-Shisheboran et al, 2003). Inhibition of the VEGF/VEGFR system has already become a clinically relevant strategy for treatment of some urological cancers, especially those refractory to the standard chemotherapy (Voigt et al, 2006;Fenner et al, 2008;Castillo-Á vila et al, 2009), whereas TGCTs are not systematically analysed in this respect.
In a recent phase II study, the multikinase inhibitor sunitinib blocking the tyrosine kinase activity of PDGFR, VEGFRs, c-kit and RET showed good tolerability in patients with multiply relapsed or refractory GCT. However, the clinical outcome was rather poor. Nevertheless, the observed decline of angiogenic tumour markers during the treatment suggested that pathways inhibited by sunitinib, such as the VEGF-pathway may be of particular importance for GCT biology. As these angiogenic pathways were presumably not enough suppressed by sunitinib -at least at the doses used in this trial (Feldman et al, 2009), we searched for a more potent and specific VEGFR-inhibitor, which may show a more pronounced antiangiogenic effect in GCT.
In our study, we could show that the two novel compounds, HP-2 and HP-14, strongly inhibit the proliferation of VEGFRpositive TGCT cells in a dose-dependent manner. Both agents also inhibited the proliferation of endothelial cells with IC 50 values that were below those of vatalanib. VEGFR specificity of the compounds was shown in experiments with VEGFR-negative renal cell carcinoma cells, which did not respond to treatment with either vatalanib or HP-compounds.
To examine the underlying molecular events of the novel compounds, we profiled transcriptional changes in both TGCT cells as well as in endothelial cells by cDNA microarrays. HP-14 regulated a variety of genes, most of which could be ascribed to cellular functions such as growth, signal transduction and regulation of the cell cycle. On HP-treatment a significant reduction in VEGFR-2 expression was observed in both Tera-1 and HUVEC cells. In addition, the expression of AKT-1 (protein kinase B), a downstream signal transduction molecule of VEGFR-2 was also detected (Takano et al, 2008). Earlier findings by Anderson et al showed the cell proliferative effects of AKT-1, which can be activated by VEGFR-2 through protein kinase-Cdependent signalling (Anderson et al, 2008). Furthermore, HP-14 treatment also inhibited the expression of other angiogenic growth factors such as PDGFA, PDGFB or FGF-2, each of them being implicated in the promotion of testicular germ cell cancer (Peltomäki et al, 1991;Bentas et al, 2003). Another angiogenic factor that was suppressed by HP-14, was the HIV-1 Tat interactive protein (HTATIP2). This proangiogenic growth factor binds and activates VEGFR-2, thereby mediating cell proliferation, cell migration and cell survival (Albini et al, 1996). These data show that angiogenesis reflected by the serum concentrations of growth factors have a functional role in tumour growth of testicular germ cell cancer and that inhibition of these factors may thus be a promising treatment option.
HP-14 also increased the expression of antiangiogenic genes such as the angiogenesis inhibitor endostatin (COL18A1). Endostatin is a protein that is supposed to neutralise many VEGF-Ainduced effects such as VEGF-induced endothelial cell migration, neovascularisation and vascular permeability (Yamaguchi et al, 1999;Takahashi et al, 2003). Thus, the upregulation of endostatin in endothelial cells during HP-14 treatment could be an explanation of antiangiogenic potency of this novel compound.
The antiproliferative mode of action of the novel compounds also involved cell cycle-regulating effects in TGCT cells. Defective function of cell cycle regulators is a main cause for tumour development and progression. For example, the cell cycle promoter cyclin D2 is frequently overexpressed in TGCTs, while cell cycle inhibitors, such as p21 are frequently suppressed (Chaganti and Houldsworth, 2000). Successful therapeutic strategies will thus have to balance or bypass this impaired signalling. In our study, we could show that treatment of TGCT cells with HP-compounds raised the expression of the cell cycle-inhibiting molecule p21, which resulted in an S-phase arrest of the cell cycle. Our observation that HP-treatment-induced S-phase arrest and p21 overexpression is in agreement with a previous report that transduction of the p21 gene resulted in an S-phase arrest (Ogryzko et al, 1997;Radhakrishnan et al, 2004;Zhu et al, 2004). Surprisingly, we also observed an increase in p27 expression on HP-treatment. In general, p27 is associated with an arrest in the G1-phase of the cell cycle. Nevertheless, p27 has also been shown to induce S-phase arrest of human hepatocellular carcinoma cells (Fuke et al, 2007). So far, the exact mechanism underlying p27-induced S-phase arrest remains to be examined. However, Sa and Stacey recently showed that growth signalling pathways, such as the AKT-pathway can regulate p27 expression in a cell cycle phase-independent manner. AKT inhibition led to an increase in p27 expression of cells that were arrested in the S-phase (Sa and Stacey, 2004). In our gene array experiments, we also observed an inhibition of the AKT because of HP-14 treatment. Thus, it is at least feasible that the S-phase arrest of HP-treated TGCT cells is mainly induced by an increase in p21, whereas the concomitantly observed AKT inhibition might lead to increasing levels of p27 of S-phase arrested cells. However, further investigations will have to clarify the exact role of p27 during HP-induced cell cycle arrest of TGCT cells. The p21 expression is also correlated with a reduction of the cell cycle-controlling phosphatase protein cdc25A (de Oliveira et al, 2009), a protein that was found to be downregulated by the novel HP-compounds in TGCT cells. Suppression of cdc25A is implicated in the inhibition of tumour growth-promoting MAPK activity (Wang et al, 2008). The MAPK pathway protein ERK1/2 (extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2) is activated by VEGFR-2 (Rubinfeld and Seger, 2005;Narasimhan et al, 2009). Corresponding to the postulated VEGFR-specific action of the HP-compounds, we could show a decrease in ERK1/2 activity after HP-treatment.
Endothelial cell migration is one of the key characteristics in VEGFR-2-mediated angiogenesis (Shibuya, 2006). In this study, we could show that HP-2 and HP-14 both inhibited endothelial cell migration and suppress in vivo neovascularisation in a chorioallantoic membrane assay. Further evaluations will have to clarify the compatibility of the novel HP-compounds in vivo. In this respect, it is noteworthy that preliminary studies on healthy mice showed promising tolerability of the HP-substances (50 mg kg -1 ) when given in 48 h intervals for seven days. Treated mice (n ¼ 7) did neither show weight loss or any altered behaviour. Histological examination of kidney, spleen, lung and liver of the dispatched animals did not show abnormalities or signs of inflammatory infiltrations (data not shown).
In summary, our study showed that the identified novel compounds are able to potently block TGCT cell growth and angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo. The inhibitory effects of the novel compounds were even more pronounced than those of the clinically relevant VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, vatalanib, which was used as the lead structure for the identification of structurally related novel compounds with antiangiogenic and antiproliferative potency. The complex mode of action of HP-compounds involved cell cycle-arresting effects as well as a shifting of the balance of pro-and antiangiogenic genes towards angiogenic suppression and antiangiogenic stimulation (Baeriswyl and Christofori, 2009). The fact that only the growth of VEGFR-2expressing endothelial and TGCT cells was markedly inhibited, suggests that VEGFR-2 is the major target of the novel HP-compounds. On the basis of our findings, we think that the presented compounds may become promising candidates for innovative approaches in TGCT treatment and warrant further evaluation.