E17K substitution in AKT1 in prostate cancer

Background: The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)–AKT pathway is activated in many cancers. Mutational hotspots in AKT1 and in the regulatory and catalytic subunits of PI3K have been detected in multiple tumour types. In AKT1, the E17K substitution leads to a PI3K-independent activation of AKT1. Methods: A mutational profiling of AKT1 and of the mutational hotspots in PIK3CA and PIK3R1 was carried out in samples from primary and recurrent prostate tumours. Results: We show that, in prostate cancer, AKT1(E17K) had a prevalence of 1.4%. The mutation seemed to be associated with a favourable clinical course but it was not associated with a specific tumour growth pattern. Activating mutations in PIK3CA or PIK3R1 were not found in prostate cancer. Conclusion: The E17K substitution in AKT1 is rare in prostate cancer. It seems associated with a favourable clinical outcome but not with a specific histology of the tumour.

Activating mutations in AKT1 or PI3K are other mechanisms that lead to stimulation of the PI3K -AKT pathway. PI3K is a heterodimer composed of a regulatory subunit (p85a), encoded by PIK3R1, and a catalytic subunit (p110 a), encoded by PIK3CA. PIK3CA has frequently been reported as being mutated in various human cancers (Samuels et al, 2004;Levine et al, 2005). PIK3R1 mutations are less common, although recently it was shown that PIK3R1 was mutated in up to 10% of glioblastomas (Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, 2008;Parsons et al, 2008). Mutations in either gene lead to a disruption of the interaction between the regulatory and catalytic subunits, which enhances enzymatic activity (Huang et al, 2007), thereby activating the PI3K -AKT pathway. In prostate cancer, however, activating mutations in PIK3CA or PIK3R1 have not been reported thus far (Majumder and Sellers, 2005;Ligresti et al, 2009).
Recently, a unique mutation in the pleckstrin homology domain of AKT1 was identified in breast, ovarian, and colorectal cancer (Carpten et al, 2007). This G4A mutation results in a lysine substitution for glutamate at position 17 (E17K) and leads to a PI3K-independent activation of AKT1. The mutation was mutually exclusive with respect to mutations in PI3K and loss of PTEN protein expression. Others confirmed the mutation in breast and colorectal tumours (Bleeker et al, 2008) and incidental cases were identified in bladder, endometrial, lung, and skin cancer (Davies et al, 2008;Do et al, 2008;Malanga et al, 2008;Zilberman et al, 2009;Shoji et al, 2009). An analogous E17K substitution in AKT3 has also been found in melanomas (Davies et al, 2008). Previously, we reported on the E17K substitution in AKT1 in a ductal adenocarcinoma of the prostate in a patient who had a very long cancer-specific survival (Boormans et al, 2008).
In this study, we analysed the prevalence of AKT1(E17K) in a larger cohort of prostate cancer patients. We investigated whether the E17K substitution in AKT1 was associated with a specific growth pattern of prostate cancer and whether it corresponded with clinical outcome.

AKT1
Genomic DNA was available from 184 freshly frozen clinical prostate cancer samples. A total of 85 samples were primary prostate tumours obtained by radical prostatectomy, 88 samples were locally advanced or recurrent tumours obtained by transurethral resection of the prostate, and 11 samples were hormonenaïve prostate cancer lymph node metastases obtained by pelvic lymph node dissection. An additional 30 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded primary prostate tumours were selected, including 18 ductal adenocarcinomas of the prostate and 12 primary prostate tumours with the following characteristics: pathological T stage X pT3a, prostate-specific antigen level X4.0 ng ml À1 , any Gleason score, and a cancer-specific survival of 413 years. From the cancerous regions of the paraffinembedded samples, 1-mm core biopsy samples were taken (Beecher Instruments, Silver Spring, MD, USA). In mutated samples, a core biopsy sample was taken from adjacent benign prostatic tissue to test whether the mutation was truly somatic. Genomic DNA was isolated using the Puregene DNA isolation kit (BIOzym, Landgraaf, the Netherlands), according to the manufacturer's instructions.
PCR analysis was carried out to yield a 198-bp genomic fragment of AKT1 (see Supplementary Table 1 for primer sequences). PCR products were identified by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis and ethidium bromide staining. After ExoSapI (USB, Staufen, Germany) treatment, the PCR fragments were sequenced with the reverse AKT1 primer. Sequence reaction products were analysed on the ABI 3700 automated DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Carslbad, CA, USA). The freshly frozen samples containing the E17K substitution in AKT1 were also analysed for PTEN mutations and for mutations in the mutational hotspots of exons 9 and 20 of PIK3CA (see Supplementary Table 1 for primer sequences of PIK3CA and PTEN).

PIK3CA and PIK3R1
Mutational analysis of PIK3CA and PIK3R1 was also carried out on a subset of 63 freshly frozen tissue samples: 61 transurethral resection of the prostate samples and two lymph node metastases. The exons known to contain mutational hotspots were sequenced, that is, exons 9 and 20 for PIK3CA and exons 14 and 15 for PIK3R1 (see Supplementary Table 1 for primer sequences).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The PI3K -AKT signalling pathway is a central factor in various cellular processes that are involved in carcinogenesis. The E17K substitution in AKT1 is an important mechanism that leads to a PI3K-independent activation of AKT1 (Carpten et al, 2007). Rare E17K substitution in AKT3 has also been described (Davies et al, 2008). In this study, we focussed on the more common AKT1(E17K) substitution in prostate cancer. Previously, we identified AKT1(E17K) in a pure ductal adenocarcinoma of the prostate in a patient who had a long survival (Boormans et al, 2008). Here, we analysed an additional 18 ductal prostate cancer samples; however, none of these samples contained the E17K substitution in AKT1. Therefore, we concluded that an association between AKT1(E17K) and a specific ductal growth pattern of prostate cancer is unlikely. This is in contrast to AKT1(E17K) in breast and lung cancer. In breast cancer, the mutation was unique for lobular and ductal histotypes (Bleeker et al, 2008), whereas in lung tumours AKT1(E17K) was only seen in squamous cell carcinomas (Bleeker et al, 2008;Do et al, 2008;Malanga et al, 2008).
Next, we randomly extended our search for AKT1(E17K) in 184 freshly frozen clinical prostate cancer samples. One extra patient harbouring the mutation was identified. The sample was a primary prostate tumour obtained by radical prostatectomy. The tumour was a moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma (Gleason score 3 þ 3 ¼ 6) with bladder neck involvement (pathological T stage: pT4a) and positive surgical margins. Moreover, occult pelvic lymph node metastases were present at the time of radical prostatectomy. Despite these prognostic unfavourable characteristics, the patient is still alive at the end of follow-up (survival B17 years). These findings were in agreement with the clinical course of the patient we described in our previous report (Boormans et al, 2008). That patient was diagnosed with a poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (Gleason score 4 þ 4 ¼ 8), but he also had a long survival (418 years) and he did not die from prostate cancer (see Table 1a for the clinical and histopathological characteristics of the patients).
To investigate whether AKT1(E17K) in prostate cancer was associated with a favourable clinical outcome, as suggested by the first two patients harbouring the AKT1 mutation, we selected an additional 12 paraffin-embedded primary prostate tumours. All patients had unfavourable clinicopathological characteristics; nevertheless, they had a survival of 413 years (see Materials and Methods section for selection criteria). In these additional 12 prostate tumours, we identified one extra patient having the E17K substitution in AKT1. Pathology showed a moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma (Gleason score 3 þ 3 ¼ 6) with extracapsular extension (pathological T stage: pT3a) and positive surgical margins. Almost 18 years after the radical prostatectomy, the patient died from causes other than prostate cancer.
In a recent series from our institution on patients with clinical T3 prostate tumours who were treated by radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy, cancer-specific and overall survival  (Hsu et al, 2009). In a recent review, it was hypothesised that the presence of AKT1(E17K) is associated with a less-aggressive form of cancer (Brugge et al, 2007). The findings of our present series could be in agreement with such a hypothesis: all three patients harbouring the E17K substitution in AKT1 had a very long survival despite aggressive clinicopathological characteristics. Obviously, the findings of this study do not prove an association with better outcome because of the low prevalence of AKT1(E17K) in prostate cancer.
The mutational profiling of the mutational hotspots of PIK3CA and PIK3R1 in a subset of 63 prostate cancer patients did not reveal any mutated sample, which is consistent with earlier findings (Ligresti et al, 2009).
In conclusion, we have identified three patients harbouring E17K substitution in AKT1 in prostate cancer, rendering the reported frequency for AKT1(E17K) in prostate cancer at 1.4% (3 out of 214 patients examined). The mutation showed to be truly somatic, as the sequence of AKT1 derived from benign prostatic tissue of patients carrying the mutation was of wild type (data not shown). AKT1(E17K) seemed to be associated with a favourable clinical course, but no correlation with a ductal growth pattern of prostate cancer was found. Furthermore, the E17K substitution in AKT1 was mutually exclusive with respect to mutations in PTEN and PIK3CA, as in the freshly frozen samples, mutational profiling of all nine PTEN exons and of the mutational hotspots of PIK3CA (exons 9 and 20) showed no mutations (Table 1b). The possibility of loss of PTEN function by loss of expression was not assessed in this study.
Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on British Journal of Cancer website (http://www.nature.com/bjc)