Some cancer patients are immuno-compromised, and it has been long felt that immune-intervention is not compatible with standard chemotherapies. However, increasing evidence suggests that standard chemotherapy drugs may stimulate beneficial changes in both the immune system and tumour.
We have assessed the expression of human leucocyte antigen class 1 (HLA1) on tumour cells before and after chemotherapy agents (cyclophosphamide, oxaliplatin or gemcitabine). In addition, we show that chemotherapy-stressed tumour cells may release cytokines that enhance the interactions between dendritic cells (DCs) and T cells into growth media.
Here we report that some chemotherapy agents can increase HLA1 expression in tumour cells, even when expression is low. Increases were associated with killing by cytotoxic T cells, which were negated by HLA1-blockade. Furthermore, T-cell function, as indicated by increased proliferation, was enhanced as supernatants derived from tumours treated with chemotherapy augmented DC-maturation and function.
There is evidence that a facet of immune surveillance can be restored by appropriate chemotherapy agents. Also, tumours exposed to some chemotherapy may secrete cytokines that can mature DCs, which ultimately enhances T-cell responses.
Cancer is associated with chronic inflammation and marked systemic immune suppression (O'Byrne and Dalgleish, 2001; Dalgleish and O'Byrne, 2002, 2006; Evans et al, 2006). Indeed, the evasion of immune surveillance and negation of its function are hallmarks or cancer. These aspects are widely overlooked (Hanahan and Weinberg, 2000), and the development of new therapies in cancer have primarily focussed on tumour killing and disturbing tumour-microenvironment interactions. These typical therapeutic approaches have resulted in impressive activities, and as our understanding of the pathogenetic pathways underlying cancer improve, new drugs that correct specific molecular defects in cancer will be formulated to fuel further successes (Workman and Kaye, 2002). Drawbacks exist, however, that limits the long-term efficacy of these drugs, such as the gradual loss of activity (Liu, 2008). These failings stem from the direct effect of the drugs, and develop gradually, as the cancer adapts to treatment and develops drug resistance. One way to prevent these adverse events is to ensure that tumour cells are cleared more efficiently and residual tumour cells are minimised. For this reason, the restoration of a competent immune system that is innately programmed to remove foreign material is an attractive aim (Bhardwaj, 2007; Liu et al, 2009).
Cytotoxic chemotherapeutic drugs affect rapidly growing cells, and as a consequence cause collateral damage to cells of the immune system. In this regard they are considered immunosuppressive. However, there is increasing evidence to suggest that some cancer chemotherapies may actually aid immunotherapy by activating the immune system rather than suppressing it (Chaudhuri et al, 2009). This is supplementary to the conventional cytotoxic effects, and may be a product of enhancements in the adaptive response. For example, the nucleoside analogue gemcitabine (GEM), in addition to its apoptotic effects, selectively promotes the cell-mediated immune response over the humoral immune response by selectively inhibiting B-cell proliferation (Nowak et al, 2002), decreasing memory T cells, and promoting the activation of naive T cells (Plate et al, 2005) and function of CD8+ T cells (Suzuki et al, 2005). Immunopotentiation is also achieved in part by the inhibitory effect of GEM on myeloid-derived suppressor cells (Bronte et al, 2000). Furthermore, maximising the interactions between T cells and professional antigen presenting cells (APCs), such as dendritic cells (DCs), have been shown to enhance adaptive responses, which ultimately leads to the elimination of tumour (Steinman and Banchereau, 2007). The maturation of DCs has a key role in initiating T-cell responses as they possess the ability to initiate primary adaptive immune response through the capture, processing and presentation of antigen to naive CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. These have pivotal roles in the induction of T-cell-mediated anti-tumour responses in vivo.
In addition to the effects on immune cells, the process of immunosurveillance can also be a target for chemotherapy; indeed, the ability to evade immunity is a regular feature of cancer cells. The molecular transformations that occur during oncogenesis, which cause cancer cells to be pro-survival and anti-apoptotic are the same ones that interfere with immune responses against tumour cells (Fuchs and Matzinger, 1996; Pardoll, 2003). For instance, dysregulation of the RAS and mitogen activated protein kinase signalling pathways that promote anti-apoptotic and pro-survival behaviour in some cancers (Dhillon et al, 2007; Roberts and Der, 2007) can also interfere with human leucocyte antigen class 1 (HLA1) antigen processing on tumour cells. As cytotoxic T cells are restricted by HLA1 and kill tumour cells only in the presence of HLA1, tumours lacking this antigen may become undetectable to immune cells. It is predicted that restoration of HLA1 expression could re-initialise immune visibility in tumour cells.
As part of our ongoing studies to investigate the effect of chemotherapy on immune function, we explored the effect of supernatant derived from tumour cells exposed to chemotherapy, on DC function, to test the hypothesis that chemotherapy-stressed tumour cells secrete cytokines and other factors that promote the antigen presenting behaviour of DCs. In addition, we explored the role of chemotherapy on the HLA1 expression on tumour cells to see if restoration of HLA1 expression on tumour cells may re-engage immune-cell function and enhance tumour cell death.
Materials and methods
Cyclophosphamide (CPM; Sigma, Dorset, UK), GEM (Eli Lilly Pharmacy, St George's Hospital, London, UK) and oxaliplatin (OXP; Sigma) were dissolved in dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) to create 10 mM stock solutions that were maintained at −20°C for no longer than 4 weeks. For in vivo studies, the drugs were dissolved in 0.5% DMSO in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and stored at 4°C for the duration of the experiment. All controls used in our studies involved treatment with equal amounts of DMSO, the final concentrations of which were <0.1%.
The human cancer cell lines A549 (lung), Caki2 (kidney), HCT116 (colon), MCF7 (breast) and PC3 (prostate) were obtained from the Cancer Research UK Cell Production Laboratories and maintained in culture medium supplemented with 10% (v/v) foetal bovine serum (FBS), 2 mM L-glutamine and 1 × penicillin/streptomycin (basal culture medium). All cell lines were incubated in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 in air at 37°C, and discarded when the passage number exceeded 15.
To study the effect of CPM, GEM and OXP on cell growth, cells growing exponentially were added to 96-well plates at a density of 5 × 104 per well. Drugs were then added to the wells, ensuring an equal volume of 200 μl across the plate. Cell number was assessed at 72 h using the methylthiazoletetrazolium (MTT) assay, and the concentration of each drug required to reduce cell viability by 50% (IC50) was determined using the sigmoid Emax model as described previously (Liu et al, 2008).
Exponentially growing cells were reset in fresh culture medium at 2 × 105 cells ml−1. Following a settling-in period of 24 h, cells were treated for 3 days with equi-active concentrations of CPM (10 μ M), GEM (1 μ M) or OXP (5 μ M). Exhausted culture medium (supernatant) was gently aspirated and used in our DC studies. Cells were harvested (1 × 105) and washed twice in wash buffer (PBS containing 1% (v/v) FBS and 0.09% (v/v) NaN3), and then incubated with a fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated anti-HLA1 antibody (anti-HLA–ABC – 1 : 1000: BD Biosciences, Oxford, UK) for 30 min at 4°C. Acquisition of data was carried out within 1 h using a FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences). In all, 10 000 cells were analysed for each sample, and then the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of HLA1 was determined using the program WinMDI v2.9 (http://facs.scripps.edu/software.html).
T cells were isolated from pathologically healthy donor buffy coats (National Blood Service, London, UK) using positive cell isolation with magnetic beads coated with anti-CD3 (Miltenyi Biotec, Surrey, UK) according to manufacturer's instructions. CD3 purities, as assessed by flow cytometry, that were greater than 90% were used. Tumour cells pre-treated with CPM, GEM or OXP for 3 days were reset in culture medium at 1 × 104 cells per well in a 96-well plate in the presence or absence of a HLA1 blocking antibody (1–10 μg ml−1; Cambridge BioScience, Cambridge, UK). Cells were allowed to adhere before adding T cells at an effector : target ratio of 20 : 1. After a 24-h incubation period, cell-free media were removed for the assessment of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release using a proprietary assay kit (Cambridge BioScience). Non-adherent T cells were removed by washing twice in PBS and the tumour cell numbers were assessed in situ by the MTT assay.
In vivo model
Female nude mice were purchased from and maintained by the Biological Research Facility in a pathogen-free environment at SGUL. Animals were acclimatised for at least 7 days before each experiment, and were used at the age of 9–13 weeks. All procedures were conducted in accordance with, and approved, by the Home Office of the United Kingdom.
Exponentially growing HCT116 cells were harvested, washed and re-suspended in PBS at a concentration of 1 × 107 ml−1. Only cells with a viability of >90%, as assessed by trypan blue dye exclusion analysis, were used. Tumour cell suspension (300 μl) was then injected subcutaneously into the dorsolateral flanks of the mice and allowed to establish. Upon reaching an approximate size of 5 mm × 5 mm, CPM (100 mg kg−1), GEM (50 mg kg−1) or OXP (10 mg kg−1) was administered daily by intra-peritoneal injection. Drugs were used at clinical achievable doses. Mice were killed 3 days post treatment, and tumour masses were resected and cells disaggregated before assessing HLA1 expression as described previously.
Generating immature DCs
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated from pathologically healthy donor whole blood (National Blood Service) using Histopaque-1077 (Sigma). The mononuclear fraction was harvested and red blood cell contamination removed by incubation in hypotonic ammonium chloride. Cells were washed in PBS and platelet contamination removed by centrifugation at 200 g for 10 min, re-suspended at a concentration of 3 × 106 ml−1 in basal RPMI-1640 culture medium and incubated for 2 h in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 in air at 37°C to allow monocyte adhesion. After this time, the medium that contained non-adherent cells was aspirated from the culture flasks and stored at −80°C for the T-cell proliferation work. Fresh DC-maturing medium (culture medium containing 50 ng ml−1 interleukin-4 (IL4; Peprotech, London, UK) and 100 ng ml−1 granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GMCSF; SGUL Pharmacy) was then added to the flasks containing the adherent monocytes. Flasks were returned to the incubator for a further 7 days and fed q.o.d. with DC-maturing medium. After this time, non- and loosely-adherent cells (DC fraction) were harvested and the purity assessed by CD11c/HLA–DR/CD14 immuno-discrimination by the flow cytometer. All fluorophore-conjugated antibodies were purchased from BD Biosciences.
Stimulating DCs with tumour-derived supernatant
Immature DCs were reset at 1 × 105 cells ml−1 in supernatants derived from A549 or MCF7 tumour cells cultured with CPM, OXP or GEM, and maintained in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 in air at 37°C for 24 h. DCs were harvested, washed in wash buffer and incubated with a combination of phycoerythrin anti-CD80, allophycocyanin anti-CD83 and fluorescein isothiocyanate anti-CD86 (BD Biosciences) for 30 min at 4°C. Cells were washed in wash buffer before analyses of the percentages and MFIs of cells expressing activated DC markers.
T-cell proliferation assays
Allogeneic T cells were washed in warm PBS and cultured with 1 μ M carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE; Invitrogen, Paisley, UK) in basal culture medium for 10 min at 37°C. Dye was then quenched by washing thrice in ice-cold medium. DCs that had been pre-stimulated with tumour-derived supernatant were then admixed with CFSE-loaded T cells at a ratio of 1 : 10 (affector DCs:effector T cells), and cultured in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37°C for 4 days. The magnitudes of CFSE-positivity of the T cells were then assessed by flow cytometry.
Exposure to chemotherapy
Three chemotherapeutic drugs commonly used in the treatment of solid tumours were investigated in this study and selected on the basis of their reported associations with immune modulation. There were dose-dependant reductions in cell viabilities in cultures with CPM, OXP and GEM (Table 1). Approximate IC25 concentrations were extrapolated on Emax curves and used in the in vitro experiments. In the murine study, drugs were used at clinically relevant concentrations as described in the literature.
HLA1 expression is increased by chemotherapy
Human leucocyte antigen class 1 expression in cells was assessed by flow cytometry using a proprietary antibody directed against HLA–ABC and presented as MFI relative to the isotype control. They ranged from 10±0.67 in A549 to 59±3.1 in Caki2, and divided into those with low expression (A549 and MCF7) and those with high (Caki2, HCT116 and PC3) (Figure 1). There was little effect on HLA1 expression of culturing cells with ∼IC25 concentrations of CPM or OXP. However, culturing with GEM caused significant increases within HCT116, A549 and MCF7 cells (MFI cf. untreated controls: 132±30 vs 33±7.8; 0.23±2.3 vs 10±0.67; and 45±11 vs 18±3.7, respectively; P<0.01) (Figure 1).
Our in vivo model showed HLA1 expression in HCT116 growing subcutaneously in mice was also increased after treatment with GEM (P<0.001 cf. untreated controls), but remained unchanged when treated with CPM or OXP (Figure 1). This was seen just after 3 days of intra-peritoneal administration of drugs. No significant changes to tumour masses were observed after this short time-course (data not shown).
HLA1 expression is associated with cytotoxic T-cell function
We investigated the effect of HLA1 expression on the functional ability of cytotoxic T cells to induce cellular death by subjecting those tumour cells with drug-increased HLA1 to the cytotoxic effects of a modified mixed lymphocyte reaction. Results indicated reductions in cell number and a concomitant increase in cell death after exposure to supernatant derived from OXP or GEM as assessed by the MTT and LDH assays, respectively (Figure 2A). These effects were most clear with cells cultured in GEM-derived supernatant, in which the changes in HLA1 expression were most pronounced. Blockade of HLA1 with an antibody (clone W6/32) in cells showing the greatest cytotoxic effect (HCT116 and MCF7) reduced the extent of death. This was achieved at a lower concentration of 1 μg ml−1 in MCF7 cells and at 10 μg ml−1 in HCT116 (Figure 2B), and coincided with the extent of increased HLA1 expression.
Supernatants from tumours treated with chemotherapy stimulate DCs
Initial flow cytometric analyses (data not shown) of the effects of supernatants derived from tumour cells treated with chemotherapy on peripheral blood mononuclear cells showed no changes in MFI or percentage of cells in the natural killer (NK), T-cell and regulatory T-cell (T-reg) subsets. However, there were changes in the monocyte population, and so we explored more carefully, the effects of the supernatants on professional APCs from this fraction. Our plastic adherence method of DC-generation resulted in high yields (∼80% of total event population – based on FSC and SSC patterns) and the purities of the DCs (CD11c+, HLA–DR+ and CD14low) were >95%. The presence of undifferentiated monocytes was low with an average CD11c+ and CD14high signal of 1.5%.
Culturing the DCs with chemotherapy alone resulted in no significant changes to CD80, CD83 and CD86 expressions as defined by both percentage of positive cells (percentage of cells) and MFI (Figure 3C). Although there were significant increases in these differentiation markers on culturing DCs with supernatant derived from A549 and MCF7 tumours, there were further increases in expressions when the supernatant were from tumour cells treated with chemotherapy (Figure 3A-C).
Supernatant-stimulated DCs enhance the proliferation of allogeneic T cells
Carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester-loaded T cells were admixed with DCs stimulated with tumour-derived supernatant and the effect on proliferation was assessed by enumerating T-cell colony numbers and flow cytometric analyses of CFSE-signals in T cells. Greatest changes in DC-markers were seen in A549 cells cultured with chemotherapy and so the ability of these DCs to stimulate T-cell proliferation was studied. Initial simple morphological examination of colonies showed significant increases in their number in cultures with DC pre-treated with supernatants derived from tumours (Figure 4). Results were recapitulated in the CFSE-loaded T-cell experiments, which showed increases in the percentage of proliferating CD3+/CD4+ and CD3+/CD8+ T cells cultured with DCs derived from exposures to basal medium (7.3±1.9% and 2.9±0.059%, respectively), which were not significantly different to proliferation seen in T cells admixed with DCs exposed to supernatant derived from untreated A549 tumour (Figure 5A, B). T-cell proliferations were further increased when the DCs were pre-exposed to chemotherapy, which was significant when using supernatant from tumours cultured with GEM (Figure 5C).
This study was undertaken as part of our larger remit to investigate whether immunotherapies could enhance the activities of other modalities and, thus, improve the outcome and quality of life in cancer patients. In this study, we specifically investigated the immunopotentiating effects of CPM, OXP and GEM on a panel of cancer cell lines. By using in vitro models, we could assess the effects of these traditional chemotherapeutic agents on immune cells and tumour cells in isolation. In summary, our results showed that these cytotoxic drugs had the supplementary effect of potentially enhancing adaptive immune responses through a dual effect of increasing DC function that augmented a T-cell response and partial restoration of immune-visibility of tumour cells to T cells by an upregulation of HLA1 expression.
Enhancing the body's natural ability to trigger the immune system to kill cancer cells underlies the principle of biological therapies. These can take the form of interferons (IFNs) and growth factors, as well as a DC-vaccine approach (Dalgleish, 2004; Copier and Dalgleish, 2006), which are administered as an attempt to stimulate or restore the ability of the immune system to fight disease (Weiner et al, 2009). Recently, chemotherapeutic agents have been added to the list of biological response modifiers. These drugs are not tumour specific and affect other rapidly proliferating cells and so consequently, bone marrow-derived haematopoeitic progenitor cells will also be affected, which reduces blood cell function. Therefore, chemotherapy should be immunosuppressive; however, it can have the opposite effect and actually enhance immune function (Chaudhuri et al, 2009).
The underlying mechanism of immunopotentiation for most chemotherapeutic drugs is unknown but paradoxically, may be a consequence of their cytotoxic and immunosuppressive effects. For example, the cytotoxic alkylating agent CPM can also selectively inhibit T-regs (Meyer et al, 2009). This effect coupled with the intrinsic response of immune stem cells to rapidly mobilise and replace lymphocytes lost to CPM, can induce a quasi-hypercytokinemic event that ‘boosts’ the pool of functional T cells (Brode and Cooke, 2008). In addition, CPM may potentiate these T cells by supporting the production of T-cell-related growth factors such as type I IFNs (Schiavoni et al, 2000). These immunostimulatory events have been known since the mid-1980s, and originate from a direct effect of the drugs on immune cells (Berd et al, 1984; Livingston et al, 1987). However, little is known about the indirect effects of chemotherapy on immunity. Indeed, their cytotoxic effect towards tumour cells would generate a rich source of antigens and cytokines, which could benefit and support immune responses. For this reason, we explored the concept that the exhausted culture media from cells treated with chemotherapy may be immunologically active.
Preliminary experiments showed that supernatants from tumours treated with any of the drugs had no direct effect on the numbers and/or activation states of NKs (CD3−, CD69+, CD56+ and CD16+), T cells (CD3+, CD25+ and CD69+) and T-regs (CD4+, CD25+ and Foxp3+). However, significant changes were seen in the professional APCs (CD3−, CD80+, CD83+ and CD86+) population (data not shown). Consequently, we explored more carefully, the effects of these supernatants on monocyte-derived DCs. DCs have an important role in the development of adaptive immune responses to antigens by influencing the differentiation of naive T cells into effector T cells (Steinman, 1991). Treatment of these DCs with supernatants derived from MCF7-treated tumours had no significant effect of DC markers. However, treatment with those derived from A549 resulted in a greater extent of maturation and increased expression of co-stimulatory markers (MFIs and/or percentage of cells), which indicated immune activation (Dilioglou et al, 2003). Each of the drugs was used at equi-toxic concentrations and the effect was drug-specific, with GEM-derived supernatant being most DC-maturing and CPM the least.
After antigen uptake and processing, mature DCs migrate to sentinel lymph nodes where they can interact with naive T cells. Therefore, we next tested the functional ability of these mature DCs to engage allogeneic T cells by using a modified mixed lymphocyte reaction, in which DCs pre-exposed to supernatant were admixed with allogeneic CFSE-loaded T cells (Lyons, 2000). The A549 tumour cell line was only used in these experiments as they exhibited greatest change in CD80/83/86 expression, and so would be most likely to activate T cells. Results showed increased proliferation of CD3+/CD4+ and CD3+/CD8+ cells in cultures wherein the supernatants were DC-maturing, which were significant where maturation was greatest (GEM-derived supernatant). Increased proliferation was also associated with increased production of IFN-γ (data not shown).
Dendritic cells are specialised APCs that are able to process and present antigens to T cells, which enables the immune system to mount an antigen-specific immune response against tumour cells. They are commonly used as vaccines (Mocellin et al, 2004). DC-vaccine therapy involves generating immature DCs in vitro by culturing peripheral blood monocytes with GMCSF and IL4, before exposing them to cancer-specific antigens and re-administration into the patient. Maturation is essential for eliciting an immune response (de Vries et al, 2003) and is commonly induced by culturing in a cocktail of tumour necrosis factor-α, IL-1β, IL6 and prostaglandin-E2 (Jonuleit et al, 1997). These cytokines are used to prepare vaccines for cancer patients; however, our results suggest that maturation may be achieved by exposing immature DCs to supernatants derived from tumours without the need for other growth factors. Also, these supernatants are rich sources of tumour-derived antigens that can support a cytotoxic T-cell response. Similarly, the strong possibility that tumours cells challenged with chemotherapy are producing cytokines that potentiate DC function is interesting, and forms the basis of an ongoing parallel study. Although our results stem from allogeneic experiments, the idea that supernatants derived specifically from tumours treated with some forms of chemotherapy can enhance adaptive immune responses is attractive. These data support the idea of combinations between immune-based and conventional cancer therapies, and so we are currently investigating these effects in an autologous system.
A decrease in the expression and/or function of HLA1 has often been found in tumour cells, which may provide a route through which adaptive T-cell responses can escape (Cabrera et al, 2003; Aptsiauri et al, 2007). The deficiency can be caused by loss of transcription and translation elements (Garrido et al, 1993) or epigenetic modifications that silence regulatory genes (Tomasi et al, 2006). Losses can also result from dysregulations of cellular signalling pathways, which are commonly altered in cancer cells. Parenthetically, these pro-oncogenic events can, in addition to promoting tumour growth and survival, reduce immune visibility (Bianco et al, 2006). HLA1 expression was assessed in our small group of tumour cell lines and the basal levels varied from relatively high (Caki2) to low (A549). As cytotoxic T cells are restricted by HLA1 and kill tumour cells only in the presence of HLA1, tumours lacking this antigen may be undetected by immune cells. Consequently, enhancing HLA1 expression could restore immune visibility in tumour cells. This has been shown possible by irradiation (Klein et al, 1994), hence we next assessed the effects of chemotherapy on HLA1 expression on tumours. Results showed that treatment with ∼IC25 concentrations of GEM could increase the expression of HLA1 in tumour cells; some of which exhibited low basal levels. HLA1 upregulation was recapitulated in vivo in GEM-treated HCT116 tumour cells grown subcutaneously in nude mice.
The cytotoxic effect of T cells on tumour lines with increased HLA1 expression was assessed by a modified mixed lymphocyte reaction, wherein allogeneic CD3+ sorted cells were admixed with tumours. The magnitude of cell killing was established by measuring LDH release from cells and by assessing cell numbers by the MTT assay. Results showed there was increased cytotoxic T-cell killing of those tumour cells with enhanced HLA1 expression, which was HLA1 specific, as cytotoxicity was reduced by using a blockade antibody (Fayen et al, 1998). Furthermore, antagonism was only effective at higher antibody concentrations in HCT116; a cell line in which HLA1 expression was increased the most. Technically, there was a general agreement between the assays, with increases in cytotoxicity associated with decreased cell numbers. There were some differences, for instance the increased LDH release in OXP treated MCF7 cells were not recapitulated by a decrease in MTT signal. The discrepancy between, and limitations in, the assays have been noted previously (Lobner, 2000; Fotakis and Timbrell, 2006; Liu and Dalgleish, 2009) and could be because of the washing steps that are part of the MTT assay, whereas the LDH assay uses the culture medium directly from the cells. Nevertheless, the possibility of increasing HLA1 in tumours that have low expression as a way of enhancing immune responses is appealing and is highlighted in this study.
Restoration of HLA1 expression can also have the opposite effect of rendering tumour cells refractory to NK cell mediated lysis. Specifically, the expression of a subset of HLA1 molecule can disrupt NK activity, thereby allowing tumour cells to escape innate immune responses (Storkus et al, 1991). Consequently, a reduction in its expression may be a more favourable event. Our results also showed that in addition to increases in HLA1 expression, some drugs used in the correct tumour type could reduce HLA1 expression (i.e. OXP in MCF7; Figure 1). This presents the fascinating possibility of mixing and matching chemotherapies to modify HLA1 expression in a way to exploit both the adaptive and innate immune responses (Rees and Mian, 1999). This is currently being investigated.
In summary, early studies have suggested that the induction of an effective immune response could lead to the elimination of residual tumour. Subsequent attempts to enhance the immune response have essentially been on vaccine basis, trying to induce a specific response against the tumour. Numerous vaccine approaches have claimed to provide significant clinical benefits, but very few of these have survived a randomised trial. Much is known about barriers to effective vaccine therapy and it is generally assumed that ‘vaccine with something else’ is best. With our improved understanding that a number of chemotherapeutic agents have, in addition to their conventional anti-cancer effects, an element of immune stimulation means that treatment strategies can be developed to exploit the duality of these drugs. Using chemotherapy as an adjuvant to immunotherapy could work in a number of ways. Tumour burden would be reduced through its direct cytotoxic effect, which would simultaneously generate a source of cancer-derived antigens in the form of cellular debris. Furthermore, it could restore immunovisibility by increasing HLA1 and simultaneously enhance the response of the immune system to immunotherapies.
Aptsiauri N, Cabrera T, Mendez R, Garcia-Lora A, Ruiz-Cabello F, Garrido F (2007) Role of altered expression of HLA class I molecules in cancer progression. Adv Exp Med Biol 601: 123–131
Berd D, Maguire Jr HC, Mastrangelo MJ (1984) Potentiation of human cell-mediated and humoral immunity by low-dose cyclophosphamide. Cancer Res 44: 5439–5443
Bhardwaj N (2007) Harnessing the immune system to treat cancer. J Clin Invest 117: 1130–1136
Bianco R, Melisi D, Ciardiello F, Tortora G (2006) Key cancer cell signal transduction pathways as therapeutic targets. Eur J Cancer 42: 290–294
Brode S, Cooke A (2008) Immune-potentiating effects of the chemotherapeutic drug cyclophosphamide. Crit Rev Immunol 28: 109–126
Bronte V, Apolloni E, Cabrelle A, Ronca R, Serafini P, Zamboni P, Restifo NP, Zanovello P (2000) Identification of a CD11b(+)/Gr-1(+)/CD31(+) myeloid progenitor capable of activating or suppressing CD8(+) T cells. Blood 96: 3838–3846
Cabrera T, López-Nevot MA, Gaforio JJ, Ruiz-Cabello F, Garrido F (2003) Analysis of HLA expression in human tumor tissues. Cancer Immunol Immunother 52: 1–9
Chaudhuri D, Suriano R, Mittelman A, Tiwari RK (2009) Targeting the immune system in cancer. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 10: 166–184
Copier J, Dalgleish A (2006) Overview of tumor cell-based vaccines. Int Rev Immunol 25: 297–319
Dalgleish AG (2004) Cancer vaccines as a therapeutic strategy. Expert Rev Vaccines 3: 665–668
Dalgleish AG, O'Byrne K (2006) Inflammation and cancer: the role of the immune response and angiogenesis. Cancer Treat Res 130: 1–38
Dalgleish AG, O'Byrne KJ (2002) Chronic immune activation and inflammation in the pathogenesis of AIDS and cancer. Adv Cancer Res 84: 231–276
de Vries IJ, Lesterhuis WJ, Scharenborg NM, Engelen LP, Ruiter DJ, Gerritsen MJ, Croockewit S, Britten CM, Torensma R, Adema GJ, Figdor CG, Punt CJ (2003) Maturation of dendritic cells is a prerequisite for inducing immune responses in advanced melanoma patients. Clin Cancer Res 9: 5091–5100
Dhillon AS, Hagan S, Rath O, Kolch W (2007) MAP kinase signalling pathways in cancer. Oncogene 26: 3279–3290
Dilioglou S, Cruse JM, Lewis RE (2003) Function of CD80 and CD86 on monocyte- and stem cell-derived dendritic cells. Exp Mol Pathol 75: 217–227
Evans C, Dalgleish AG, Kumar D (2006) Review article: immune suppression and colorectal cancer. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 24: 1163–1177
Fayen J, Huang JH, Ferrone S, Tykocinski ML (1998) Negative signaling by anti-HLA class I antibodies is dependent upon two triggering events. Int Immunol 10: 1347–1358
Fotakis G, Timbrell JA (2006) In vitro cytotoxicity assays: comparison of LDH, neutral red, MTT and protein assay in hepatoma cell lines following exposure to cadmium chloride. Toxicol Lett 160: 171–177
Fuchs EJ, Matzinger P (1996) Is cancer dangerous to the immune system? Semin Immunol 8: 271–280
Garrido F, Cabrera T, Concha A, Glew S, Ruiz-Cabello F, Stern PL (1993) Natural history of HLA expression during tumour development. Immunol Today 14: 491–499
Hanahan D, Weinberg RA (2000) The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 100: 57–70
Jonuleit H, Kühn U, Müller G, Steinbrink K, Paragnik L, Schmitt E, Knop J, Enk AH (1997) Pro-inflammatory cytokines and prostaglandins induce maturation of potent immunostimulatory dendritic cells under fetal calf serum-free conditions. Eur J Immunol 27: 3135–3142
Klein B, Loven D, Lurie H, Rakowsky E, Nyska A, Levin I, Klein T (1994) The effect of irradiation on expression of HLA class I antigens in human brain tumors in culture. J Neurosurg 80: 1074–1077
Liu WM (2008) Enhancing the cytotoxic activity of novel targeted therapies – is there a role for a combinatorial approach? Curr Clin Pharmacol 3: 108–117
Liu WM, Dalgleish AG (2009) MTT assays can underestimate cell numbers. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 64: 861–862
Liu WM, Meyer B, Dalgleish AG (2009) How immunotherapy can enhance the response to other modalities and improve outcome and quality of life. J BUON 14: S103–S109
Liu WM, Scott KA, Shamash J, Joel S, Powles TB (2008) Enhancing the in vitro cytotoxic activity of Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol in leukemic cells through a combinatorial approach. Leuk Lymphoma 49: 1800–1809
Livingston PO, Cunningham-Rundles S, Marfleet G, Gnecco C, Wong GY, Schiffman G, Enker WE, Hoffman MK (1987) Inhibition of suppressor-cell activity by cyclophosphamide in patients with malignant melanoma. J Biol Response Mod 6: 392–403
Lobner D (2000) Comparison of the LDH and MTT assays for quantifying cell death: validity for neuronal apoptosis? J Neurosci Methods 96: 147–152
Lyons AB (2000) Analysing cell division in vivo and in vitro using flow cytometric measurement of CFSE dye dilution. J Immunol Methods 243: 147–154
Meyer B, Liu WM, Dalgleish A, Galustian C (2009) The role of Tregs in cancer: Foxp3 as a putative target for therapy. Curr Signal Transd T 4: 122–129
Mocellin S, Mandruzzato S, Bronte V, Lise M, Nitti D (2004) Part I: vaccines for solid tumours. Lancet Oncol 5: 681–689
Nowak AK, Robinson BW, Lake RA (2002) Gemcitabine exerts a selective effect on the humoral immune response: implications for combination chemo-immunotherapy. Cancer Res 62: 2353–2358
O'Byrne KJ, Dalgleish AG (2001) Chronic immune activation and inflammation as the cause of malignancy. Br J Cancer 85: 473–483
Pardoll D (2003) Does the immune system see tumors as foreign or self? Annu Rev Immunol 21: 807–839
Plate JM, Plate AE, Shott S, Bograd S, Harris JE (2005) Effect of gemcitabine on immune cells in subjects with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Cancer Immunol Immunother 54: 915–925
Rees RC, Mian S (1999) Selective MHC expression in tumours modulates adaptive and innate antitumour responses. Cancer Immunol Immunother 48: 374–381
Roberts PJ, Der CJ (2007) Targeting the Raf-MEK-ERK mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade for the treatment of cancer. Oncogene 26: 3291–3310
Schiavoni G, Mattei F, Di Pucchio T, Santini SM, Bracci L, Belardelli F, Proietti E (2000) Cyclophosphamide induces type I interferon and augments the number of CD44(hi) T lymphocytes in mice: implications for strategies of chemoimmunotherapy of cancer. Blood 95: 2024–2030
Steinman RM (1991) The dendritic cell system and its role in immunogenicity. Annu Rev Immunol 9: 271–296
Steinman RM, Banchereau J (2007) Taking dendritic cells into medicine. Nature 449: 419–426
Storkus WJ, Salter RD, Alexander J, Ward FE, Ruiz RE, Cresswell P, Dawson JR (1991) Class I-induced resistance to natural killing: identification of non-permissive residues in HLA-A2. Proc Natl Acad Sci 88: 5989–5992
Suzuki E, Kapoor V, Jassar AS, Kaiser LR, Albelda SM (2005) Gemcitabine selectively eliminates splenic Gr-1+/CD11b+ myeloid suppressor cells in tumor-bearing animals and enhances antitumor immune activity. Clin Cancer Res 11: 6713–6721
Tomasi TB, Magner WJ, Khan AN (2006) Epigenetic regulation of immune escape genes in cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother 55: 1159–1184
Weiner LM, Dhodapkar MV, Ferrone S (2009) Monoclonal antibodies for cancer immunotherapy. Lancet 373: 1033–1040
Workman P, Kaye SB (2002) Translating basic cancer research into new cancer therapeutics. Trends Mol Med 8: S1–S9
We thank Dr. John Copier (SGUL) for critical reading of the manuscript and Mr. Jake Henry (SGUL) for providing technical assistance with the murine experiments. This work was supported by the Cancer Vaccine Institute (www.cancervaccine.org.uk).
Rights and permissions
From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, W., Fowler, D., Smith, P. et al. Pre-treatment with chemotherapy can enhance the antigenicity and immunogenicity of tumours by promoting adaptive immune responses. Br J Cancer 102, 115–123 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605465
- dendritic cells