Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Role of β3-adrenergic receptors in the action of a tumour lipid mobilizing factor

This article has been updated


Induction of lipolysis in murine white adipocytes, and stimulation of adenylate cyclase in adipocyte plasma membranes, by a tumour-produced lipid mobilizing factor, was attenuated by low concentrations (10−7–10−5M) of the specific β3-adrenoceptor antagonist SR59230A. Lipid mobilizing factor (250 nM) produced comparable increases in intracellular cyclic AMP in CHOK1 cells transfected with the human β3-adrenoceptor to that obtained with isoprenaline (1 nM). In both cases cyclic AMP production was attenuated by SR59230A confirming that the effect is mediated through a β3-adrenoceptor. A non-linear regression analysis of binding of lipid mobilizing factor to the β3-adrenoceptor showed a high affinity binding site with a Kd value 78±45 nM and a Bmax value (282±1 fmole mg protein−1) comparable with that of other β3-adrenoceptor agonists. These results suggest that lipid mobilizing factor induces lipolysis through binding to a β3-adrenoceptor.


Patients with cancer cachexia experience a dramatic loss of body fat as the condition progresses. A study of the body composition of lung cancer patients, who had lost 30% of their pre-illness stable weight, showed an 85% decrease in total body fat (Fearon, 1992), reflecting a prolonged catabolic state. Cancer patients with weight loss have been found to have an elevated level of a lipid mobilizing factor (LMF) in both serum and urine, which appears to parallel the weight loss (Groundwater et al, 1990). We have isolated LMF from the urine of cancer patients by a combination of ion exchange, exclusion and hydrophobic interaction chromatographies, and shown it to be homologous with the plasma protein Zn-α2-glycoprotein (ZAG) in primary sequence, electrophoretic mobility and immunoreactivity (Todorov et al, 1998). In vivo studies confirmed the ability of LMF to cause selective loss of carcass fat with no change in body water, and a tendency to increase the nonfat mass. LMF was characterized by the ability to stimulate lipolysis directly in isolated adipocytes, as a result of stimulation of adenylate cyclase in a GTP-dependent process (Hirai et al, 1998). The receptor for this interaction has not been characterized, but indirect evidence suggests that it may be a β3-adrenergic receptor (β3-AR).

Thus treatment of ob/ob mice with LMF, not only produced a specific depletion of the adipose mass together with an elevation of serum glycerol levels, but also an increased oxygen uptake by interscapular brown adipose tissue (BAT) (Hirai et al, 1998). Pharmacological studies indicate that the β-receptor responsible for the stimulation of oxygen consumption in BAT is exclusively of the β3-subtype (Howe, 1993). Induction of lipolysis in epididymal adipocytes by LMF was attenuated by the β-adrenergic receptor blocker propranolol (Khan and Tisdale, 1999), while the biphasic effect of GTP on cyclic AMP production by LMF in adipocyte plasma membranes suggests a receptor associated with both Gs and Gi. Only β3 and not β1-AR interact with Gi in adipocyte membranes (Granneman, 1995).

In the present study the ability of LMF to interact with the β3-AR has been studied both in white adipocytes and in CHO cells transfected with the human β3-AR.

Materials and methods


Urine was collected over a 24 h period from patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer and with a weight loss between 0.5 and 3 kg month−1. No patient had received radiotherapy or chemotherapy. Urine samples were stored at −20°C in the absence of preservatives prior to use.


[α-32P]-ATP (sp. act. 20 Cimmol−1) and Na [125I] (sp. act. >15 Cimg−1 iodide) were purchased from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech (Bucks, UK). SR59230A was kindly donated by Dr L Manara of the Research Centre Sanofi Midy, Sanofi Winthrop S.p.A., Milan, Italy.

Purification of LMF

LMF was purified from human urine using a combination of batch extraction on DEAE-cellulose and hydrophobic interaction chromatography (Todorov et al, 1998). Urine was centrifuged at 3000 g for 10 min to remove particulate material and was then diluted with 4 vol 10 mM Tris HCl, pH 8.0. DEAE-cellulose, previously activated by washing in 100 mM Tris HCl, pH 8.0 for 5 min was added to the diluted urine (10 g l−1 of original urine) and the mixture was stirred for 2 h at 4°C. The DEAE-cellulose was recovered by sedimentation by low speed centrifugation, and the LMF was eluted with 0.5 M NaCl in 10 mM Tris HCl, pH 8.0. The eluate was equilibrated and concentrated to 1 ml by ultrafiltration, in an Amicon filtration cell (Millipore (UK) Ltd, Watford, Herts, UK) containing a membrane filter with a molecular weight cut-off of 10 kDa, against PBS. Further purification was achieved using a Resource-Iso HPLC column (Pharmacia Biotech, St Albans, Herts, UK), employing a decreasing (NH4)2SO4 concentration from 1.5 M. Active fractions containing LMF eluted at 0.6 M (NH4)2SO4, and were desalted before use by washing five times against PBS using an Amicon filtration cell.

Lipolytic assay

A single cell suspension of white adipocytes was prepared from the epididymal adipose tissue of ex-breeder male NMRI mice using collagenase digestion (Beck and Tisdale, 1987). Lipolytic activity was determined by measuring glycerol release (Wieland, 1974) after incubation of LMF with 105−2 × 105 adipocytes for 2 h at 37°C in 1 ml Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate buffer, pH 7.2. Control samples containing adipocytes alone were analyzed to determine the spontaneous glycerol release. Lipid mobilizing activity was expressed as μmole glycerol released 105 adipocytes−1 2 h−1.

Adenylate cyclase assay

Plasma membranes were isolated from epididymal adipocytes, as previously described (Khan and Tisdale, 1999). Briefly isolated adipocytes were homogenized in 250 mM sucrose, 2 mM EGTA and 10 mM Tris HCl pH 7.4, followed by centrifugation at 30 000 g for 1 h at 4°C. The membrane pellet formed was isolated and separated from other organelle membranes on a self forming Percoll gradient, and the mixture was centrifuged at 10 000 g for 30 min at 4°C. The washed plasma membranes were diluted in 10 mM Tris HCl, pH 7.4, containing 250 mM sucrose, 2 mM EGTA and 4 μM phenylmethylsulphonylfluoride at 1–2 mg ml−1, and if not used immediately, snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −70°C until use. The adenylate cyclase assay was based on that developed by Salomon et al (1973) as previously described (Hirai et al, 1998). Briefly LMF was incubated for 10 min at 30°C together with plasma membrane in 25 mM Tris HCl, pH 7.5, 5 mM MgCl2, 10 μM GTP, 8 mM creatine phosphate, 16 units ml−1 creatine phosphokinase, 1 mM 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine and 1 mM [α-32P]-ATP (sp.act. 20 Cimmole−1) in a total volume of 100 μl. The reaction was terminated by the addition of 2% SDS, 40 mM ATP and 1.4 mM cyclic AMP. The cyclic AMP was isolated from the mixture using a combination of Dowex 50W8-400 and Alumina WN-3 columns, and the radioactivity was determined using a Tri-carb 2000A scintillation counter.

Cyclic AMP determination

CHOK1 cells transfected with the human β3-AR, under the control of hygromycin, together with the b-gal reporter construct, selected for resistance to G418, were a gift from Dr Ian Waddell, Astra Zeneca, Macclesfield, Cheshire, UK. They were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagles medium (DMEM) supplemented with 2 mM glutamine, 50 mg ml−1 hygromycin B and 200 mg ml−1 G418, under an atmosphere of 10% CO2 in air. For cyclic AMP assays cells were grown in 24 multi-well plates in 1 ml DMEM. Agonists were added to the wells and incubated for 30 min, after which the medium was removed and 0.5 ml 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 5 mM EDTA and 0.1 mM isobutylmethylxanthine was added to each well. The plate was placed in a boiling water bath for 5 min and cooled on ice for 10 min. To 50 μl of the cell extract was added 2 μCi of [8-3H]-cyclic AMP (Amersham, UK) and 20 μg of cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase (Sigma Chemical Co. Ltd, Dorset, UK) and incubated for 2 h at 4°C. Unbound cyclic AMP was removed by adsorption onto charcoal and the concentration of cyclic AMP in the sample determined by comparison with standard curves using known concentrations of cyclic AMP.

Iodination of LMF with [125I]

One iodo-bead (Pierce and Warriner, Chester, UK), washed and dried, was incubated with Na[125I] (1 mCi per 100 μg protein) for 5 min in 100 μl PBS. LMF (100 μg protein) was then added and the reaction allowed to proceed for 15 min. The iodo-bead was physically removed and free Na[125I] was removed using a Sephadex G25 column eluted with 0.1 M NaI. The [125I] LMF was concentrated using a Microcon microconcentrator with a Mr 10 000 cut-off against PBS.

Binding studies

CHOK1 cells transfected with the human β3-AR were lysed by sonication in 0.5 M MgCl2, 2 mM Tris HCl, pH 7.5 and crude membranes were pelleted by centrifugation (45 000 g, 15 min, 4°C). Binding studies were conducted in 400 μl 0.5 mM MgCl2 50 mM Tris HCl, pH 7.5, by incubation of membranes (50 μg protein) with various concentrations of [125I] LMF for 60 min at 37°C. The samples were then centrifuged at 13 000 g for 20 min, the supernatant was removed and the radioactivity of the pellet was determined using a Packard Cobra Model 5005 Auto-gamma counter. Binding was analyzed using non-linear regression analysis (GraphPad Prism, Version 3.00 for windows, GraphPad Software (San Diego, CA, USA)).


LMF induced a direct lipolytic response in murine white adipocytes, and this effect was attenuated by low concentrations (10−5–10−7M) of SR59230A (Figure 1A), which has been reported to have a 10-fold selectivity for the β3-AR over the β1-AR (Nisoli et al, 1996). Induction of lipolysis by LMF was associated with a stimulation of adenylate cyclase in isolated adipocyte membranes in the presence of 0.1 μM GTP, and this action was almost completely inhibited by SR59230A at concentrations as low as 10−9M (Figure 1B). The difference in sensitivity of intact adipocytes and plasma membranes may be related to access of SR59230A to the β3-AR. SR59230A has been shown to bind strongly to albumin (Nisoli et al, 1996) reducing the effective concentration available in the adipocyte assay. These results suggest that LMF stimulates lipolysis through interaction with a β3-AR.

Figure 1

(A) Effect of the β3-AR antagonist SR59230A on lipolysis in murine white adipoctes; induced by LMF. Adipocytes were preincubated with the indicated concentration of SR59230A for 30 min prior to the addition of LMF (465 nM). (B) Effect of SR59230A on the stimulation of adenylate cyclase in isolated murine adipocyte plasma membranes by LMF. Membranes were preincubated with the indicated concentrations of SR59230A for 30 min prior to the addition of LMF (2.35 μM) and adenylate cyclase was determined as described in Materials and Methods in the presence of 0.1 μM GTP. The results are expressed as means ±s.d. and the data is representative of three separate experiments. Differences from incubation in the absence of SR59230A is indicated c, P<0.005 and d, P<0.001 as determined by Student's t-test.

To investigate this possibility the effect of LMF on cyclic AMP production was determined in CHOK1 cells, which had been transfected with the human β3-AR. The data presented in Figure 2 shows that both isoprenaline and LMF stimulated cyclic AMP production, which reached a comparable maximum level of 25 pmoles per 106 cells with both agents. However maximal cyclic AMP production was achieved with much lower concentrations of isoprenaline (1 nM) than LMF (250 nM), suggesting that LMF had a lower affinity for the β3-AR than isoprenaline. The increase in intracellular cyclic AMP produced by both isoprenaline and LMF in CHOK1β3 was attenuated by the non-specific β-AR antagonist propranolol (10 μM), while the effect on LMF, although significant, was less than complete. However, cyclic AMP production by both isoprenaline and LMF was almost completely attenuated by SR59230A, confirming that the action of LMF was mediated through a β3-AR.

Figure 2

Effect of LMF (A) and isoprenaline (B) on cyclic AMP levels in CHOK1β3 cells in the absence () or presence of 10 μM propranolol (•) or 10 μM SR59230A () Differences from controls are indicated as b, P<0.01 and d, P<0.001 as determined by ANOVA.

To determine the affinity of binding of LMF to the β3-AR, LMF was radioiodinated with 125I and the binding to crude plasma membranes from CHOK1β3 cells was determined. The data is presented in Table 1. Non-linear regression analysis of binding showed a high affinity binding site for LMF with a Kd value about 100-fold lower than that of CGP 12177, a partial agonist of β3-AR (Kubo et al, 1997) and [125I] iodocyanopindolol (Hutchinson et al, 2000), commonly used in binding studies with β3-AR. However, the Bmax value for LMF was similar to that for other β3-AR agonists. Binding of [125I] LMF was significantly reduced in the presence of non-labelled LMF, the non-specific β-AR antagonist propranolol and the selective β3-AR antagonist SR59230A (Table 1). These results confirm that LMF binds to a β3-AR and stimulates adenylate cyclase.

Table 1 Kd and Bmax values for LMF and other agonists to β3-AR


Resting energy expenditure (REE) has been reported to be significantly increased in weight losing patients with lung (Fredrix et al, 1990) and pancreatic cancer (Falconer et al, 1994). Hyltander et al (1991) found that cancer patients had an elevated REE and increased fat oxidation compared with either weight losing or weight stable controls, and that this was related to an increased heart rate. Such patients were also found to exhibit an increased cardiovascular and metabolic response to adrenaline infusion (Drott et al, 1987), while administration of the non-specific β-blocker propranolol was found to produce a decrease in the basal metabolic rate (BMR) (Gambardella et al, 1999). These results led to the hypothesis of overactivity of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) in cancer patients.

Classical β1 and β2-AR mediate response to noradrenaline released from the SNS. In addition a third β-AR subtype has been identified (reviewed in Howe, 1993), which shares only 40–50% amino acid sequence identity with β1 and β2-AR, and is referred to as a β3-AR. These receptors mediate lipolysis in white adipose tissue in mice and rats (Arch et al, 1984; Arch and Wilson, 1996), and thermogenesis in BAT (Arch, 1989), and are also responsible for the unexpected negative inotropic effects of catecholamines in the heart (Gauthier et al, 1996). However, the evidence that β3-AR can mediate lipolysis in human adipocytes is controversial, since β3-AR mRNA is expressed at a much lower level than in rat or mouse (Langin et al, 1991), although lipolysis has been induced in human omental fat cells by the selective β3-AR agonist CGP 12177 (Hoffstedt et al, 1995), and LMF (Hirai et al, 1998).

We have previously shown that cachexia in both mice and humans is associated with LMF production by the tumour and excretion in the urine (Todorov et al, 1998), and that LMF stimulated lipolysis like a classical lipolytic hormone through increases in intracellular cyclic AMP as a result of the stimulation of adenylate cyclase (Hirai et al, 1997). This study shows that LMF exerts this effect through a β3-AR, although the affinity for this receptor appears to be less than seen with classical β3-AR agonists. In white adipocytes both the induction of lipolysis and the stimulation of adenylate cyclase were attenuated by the β3-AR antagonist SR59230A (Nisoli et al, 1996), while in CHO cells transfected with the human β3-AR LMF stimulated cyclic AMP production in a similar manner to isoprenaline, although the concentration required to produce maximal stimulation was 250-fold greater. In addition SR59230A attenuated the increase in cyclic AMP confirming the effect was mediated through a β3-AR. The effect of propranolol was less complete than with isoprenaline, suggesting that the mechanism of stimulation by LMF may be different. Previous studies (Khan and Tisdale, 1999) have shown propranolol to act as a non-compedative inhibitor of the induction of lipolysis in murine white adipocytes by LMF. This suggests that it may act at a site distal to the β3-AR and may attenuate the action of two β3 agonists to different extents. In this study we have used intact cells, since the coupling efficiency of β3-AR to adenylate cyclase is highly dependent upon the integrity of the cells (Granneman, 1995). However, it is known that the coupling efficiency of β3-AR is greater than that for β1-AR, thus offsetting the low binding affinity. Also unlike β1 and β2-AR the β3-AR has fewer potential phosphorylation sites and is resistant to agonist-induced desentitization (Granneman, 1995). The β3-AR mediated coupling of LMF to lipolysis would explain the lowered maximal response of human omental adipocytes to lipolysis when compared with murine white adipocytes (Hirai et al, 1998). However, the increased coupling efficiency together with the induction of UCP1 in brown adipose tissue (BAT) (Russell et al, 2000) would ensure maximum fat mobilization and utilization together with a net increase in energy expenditure. These results suggest that selective β3-AR antagonists may be useful in controlling energy expenditure and fat mobilization in cancer cachexia.

Change history

  • 16 November 2011

    This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as noted at publication


  1. Arch JRS (1989) The brown adipocyte beta-adrenoceptor. Proc Nutr Soc 48: 215–223

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arch JRS, Ainsworth AT, Cawthorne MA, Piercy V, Sennitt MV, Thody VE, Wilson C & Wilson S (1984) Atypical beta-adrenoceptor on brown adipose as target for anti-obesity drugs. Nature 309: 163–165

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Arch JRS, Cawthorne MA, Coney KA, Gusterson BA, Piercy V, Sennitt MV, Smith SA, Wallace J & Wilson S (1991) β-adrenoceptor-mediated control of thermogenesis, body composition and glucose homeostasis. In Obesity and Cachexia, Rothwell NJ, Stock MJ (eds) pp241–268, London: John Wiley and Sons Ltd

    Google Scholar 

  4. Arch JRS & Wilson S (1996) β3-adrenoceptors and the regulation of metabolism in adipose tissue. Biochem Soc Trans 24: 412–418

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Beck SA & Tisdale MJ (1987) Production of lipolytic and proteolytic factors by a murine tumor-producing cachexia in the host. Cancer Res 47: 5919–5923

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Drott C, Waldenström A & Lundholm K (1987) Cardiac sensitivity and responsiveness to beta-adrenergic stimulation in experimental cancer and undernutrition. J Mol Cell Cardiol 19: 675–683

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Falconer JS, Fearon KCH, Plester CE, Ross JA & Carter DC (1994) Cytokines, the acute-phase response and resting energy expenditure in cachectic patients with pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg 219: 325–331

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fearon KCH (1992) The mechanisms and treatment of weight loss in cancer. Proc Nutr Soc 51: 251–265

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fredrix EWHM, Soeters PB, Wouters EFM, Deerenberg IM, von Meyenfeldt MF & Saris WHM (1990) Energy balance in relation to cancer cachexia. Clin Nutr 9: 319–324

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gambardella A, Tortoriello R, Pesce L, Tagliamonte MR, Paolisso G & Varricccihio M (1999) Intralipid infusion combined with propranolol administration has favourable metabolic effects in elderly malnourished cancer patients. Metabolism 48: 291–297

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gauthier C, Tavernier G, Charpentier F, Langin D & Le Marec H (1996) Functional β3-adrenoceptor in the human heart. J Clin Invest 98: 556–562

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Granneman JG (1995) Why do adipocytes make the β3-adrenergic receptor? Cell Sig 7: 9–15

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Groundwater P, Beck SA, Barton C, Adamson C, Ferrier IN & Tisdale MJ (1990) Alteration of serum and urinary lipolytic activity with weight loss in cachectic cancer patients. Br J Cancer 62: 816–821

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hirai K, Ishiko O & Tisdale MJ (1997) Mechanism of depletion of liver glycogen in cancer cachexia. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 241: 49–52

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hirai K, Hussey HJ, Barber MD, Price SA & Tisdale MJ (1998) Biological evaluation of a lipid-mobilizing factor isolated from the urine of cancer patients. Cancer Res 58: 2359–2365

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hoffstedt J, Shimizu M, Sjöstedt S & Lönnquist F (1995) Determination of β3-adrenoceptor mediated lipolysis in human fat cells. Obesity Res 3: 447–457

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Howe R (1993) β3-Adrenergic agonists. Drugs Future 18: 529–549

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hyltander A, Drott C, Körner U, Sandström R & Lundholm K (1991) Elevated energy expenditure in cancer patients with solid tumours. Eur J Cancer 27: 9–15

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hutchinson DS, Evans BA & Summers RJ (2000) β3-Adrenoceptor regulation and relaxation responses in mouse ileum. Br J Pharmacol 129: 1251–1259

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Khan S & Tisdale MJ (1999) Catabolism of adipose tissue by a tumour-produced lipid mobilizing factor. Int J Cancer 80: 444–447

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kubo S, Matsuda A, Ohnuki T, Hattori K, Suzuki J & Nagatomo T (1997) Assessment of β2-and β3-adrenoceptors in rat white adipose tissue by radioligand binding assay. Biol Pharm Bull 20: 142–148

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Langin D, Portillo M, Saulnier-Blanche JS & Lafontan M (1991) Coexistance of three β-adrenoceptor subtypes in white fat cells of various mammalian species. Eur J Pharmacol 199: 291–301

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nisoli E, Tonello C, Landi M & Carruba MO (1996) Functional studies of the first selective β3-adrenergic receptor antagonist SR59230A in rat brown adipocytes. Mol Pharmacol 49: 7–14

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Russell ST, Tisdale MJ & Bing C (2000) Regulation of uncoupling protein-1 and -2 gene expression by a lipid mobilizing factor. Br J Cancer 83: Suppl 1 81

    Google Scholar 

  25. Salomon Y, Londos C & Rodbell M (1973) A highly sensitive adenylate cyclase assay. Anal Biochem 58: 541–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Todorov PT, McDevitt TM, Meyer DJ, Ueyama I, Ohkubo I & Tisdale MJ (1998) Purification and characterization of a tumour lipid mobilizing factor. Cancer Res 58: 2353–2358

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wieland O (1974) Glycerol UV method. In Methods of Enzymatic Analysis Bergmeyer HU (ed.) pp1404–1409, London: Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

Download references


We wish to thank Bayer Corporation, USA for financial support.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to M J Tisdale.

Rights and permissions

From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Russell, S., Hirai, K. & Tisdale, M. Role of β3-adrenergic receptors in the action of a tumour lipid mobilizing factor. Br J Cancer 86, 424–428 (2002).

Download citation


  • cachexia
  • lipid mobilizing factor
  • β3-adrenoceptor
  • energy metabolism

Further reading


Quick links