Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review
  • Published:

Critically assessing the state-of-the-art in protein structure prediction

The Pharmacogenomics Journal volume 1, pages 126–134 (2001)Cite this article

Abstract

One of the most tantalising ‘grand challenges’ in structural biology is to solve the problem of predicting the structure of a protein from its amino acid sequence alone. Although this problem appeals to many researchers on a purely academic level, the practical importance of protein structure prediction has become particularly clear with the release of the first draft of the complete human genome sequence last year. This moved modern biology into the new so-called ‘post genome’ era, and for the foreseeable future, one of the main issues in modern biology will be the characterisation of the many ‘unknown’ gene sequences which are now sitting waiting in DNA and protein data banks. Protein structure can provide a great deal of insight into the evolutionary origins, function and mechanism of a protein, and so any means for determining the 3-D structure of a novel protein will likely be of critical importance.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shortle D . Protein fold recognition Nature Struct Biol 1995 2: 91–93

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Eisenberg D . In the black of night Nature Struct Biol 1997 4: 95–97

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Koehl P, Levitt M . A brighter future for protein structure prediction Nature Struct Biol 1999 6: 108–111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Proteins 1995 23

  5. Proteins 1997 Suppl 1

  6. Proteins 1999 Suppl 3

  7. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang JH, Zhang Z, Miller W et al . Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs Nucleic Acids Res 1997 25: 3389–3402

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Eddy SR . Hidden Markov models Bioinformatics 1998 14: 755–763

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Murzin AG, Brenner SF, Hubbard T, Chothia C . SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures J Mol Biol 1995 297: 536–540

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fischer D, Bryson K, Elofsson A, Godzik A, Jones D, Karplus K et al . CAFASP-1: Critical assessment of fully automated structure prediction methods Proteins 1999 Suppl 3: 209–217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rost B . PHD: predicting one-dimensional protein structure by profile-based neural networks Meth Enzymol 1996 266: 525–539

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fischer D, Eloffson A, Rychlewski L . The 2000 Olympic Games of protein structure prediction; fully automated programs are being evaluated vis-a-vis human teams in the protein structure prediction experiment CAFASP2 Protein Eng 2000 13: 667–670

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Murzin AG . Structure classsification-based assessment of CASP3 predictions for the fold recognition targets Proteins 1999 S3: 88–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lackner P, Koppensteiner WA, Domingues F, Sippl MJ . Automated large scale evaluation of protein structure predictions Proteins 1999 S3: 7–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jones DT . Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices J Mol Biol 1999 292: 195–202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jones DT . Successful ab initio prediction of the tertiary structure of NK-lysin using multiple sequences and recognized supersecondary structural motifs Proteins 1997 Suppl 1: 185–191

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Simons KT, Bonneau R, Ruczinski I, Baker D . Ab initio protein structure prediction of CASP III targets using ROSETTA Proteins 1999 37 S3: 171–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Aszodi A, Gradwell MJ, Taylor WR . Global fold determination from a small number of distance restraints J Mol Biol 1995 251: 308–326

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bowers PM, Strauss CE, Baker D . De novo protein structure determination using sparse NMR data J Biomol NMR 2000 18: 311–318

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Young MM, Tang N, Hempel JC, Oshiro CM, Taylor EW, Kuntz ID et al . High throughput protein fold identification by using experimental constraints derived from intramolecular cross-links and mass spectrometry Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000 97: 5802–5806

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Cancer Genetics and Pharmacogenomics, Dept of Biological Sciences, Brunel University, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UK

    D T Jones

Authors
  1. D T Jones
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jones, D. Critically assessing the state-of-the-art in protein structure prediction. Pharmacogenomics J 1, 126–134 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.tpj.6500017

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.tpj.6500017

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links