PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Virtual Health Library (VHL), Cochrane Library, Clinical Trials and OpenGrey.
Randomised controlled trials comparing the clinical effectiveness of Class II restorations performed with conventional (C-GIC) or resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RM-GIC) and composite resin (CR) in primary molar teeth. No date of publication or language restrictions.
Data extraction and synthesis
Study selection was carried out independently by two reviewers, with abstracted data and risk of bias assessment being performed using the Cochrane tool. Data on the restorations were dichotomised as acceptable' (restorations without need of replacement or repair) or ‘unacceptable’ (restorations presenting failures or requiring repair or replacement) after which a number of meta-analyses were conducted.
Ten studies were included in qualitative synthesis, and nine contributing to the meta-analyses. Six studies used a split-mouth design and four a parallel design. Seven studies used USPHS criteria, two applied the FDI criteria and one used their own. Seven studies reported restorations were placed under rubber dam isolation with the other three using cotton roll isolation. Six studies were at low risk of bias and four unclear risk of bias. GIC and CR presented similar failure patterns (Risk Difference [RD] = -0.04 (95%CI; -0.11 to 0.03) p=0.25, I2 = 51%), irrespective of follow-up period, type of GIC used, method of isolation or criteria used for assessment. GICs exhibited significantly lower values of secondary carious lesions ([RD] = 0.06 (95%CI; 0.0 to 0.10), p=0.008, I2 = 0%).
GICs and CRs have comparable clinical performance in Class II restorations in primary molars. GICs did show superior performance in the occurrence of secondary carious lesions, especially when RM-GIC under rubber dam isolation was used.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $39.75 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Public Health England. Health matters: Child Dental Health 2017. London. Available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/health-matters-child-dental-health/health-matters-child-dental-health (accessed July 2018).
Sheiham A . Oral health, general health and quality of life. Bull World Health Organ 2005; 83: 644.
Wong YJ . Low-quality evidence suggests that amalgam has increased longevity compared with resin-based composite in posterior restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2016; 147:905–906.
Weldon JC, Yengopal V, Siegfried N, Gostemeyer G, Schwendicke F, Worthington HV . Dental filling materials for managing carious lesions in the primary dentition. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 10. Art. No. CD004483. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004483.pub3
Chisini LA, Collares K, Cademartori MG, et al. Restorations in primary teeth: a systematic review on survival and reasons for failures. Int J Paediatr Dent 2018; 28:123–139.
Innes NP, Ricketts D, Chong LY, Keightley AJ, Lamont T, Santamaria RM . Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 12: Art. No. CD005512.
Address for correspondence: Sao Paulo State University (Unsep), School of Dentistry, Aracatuba, Department of Paediatric Dentistry and Public Health, Rua Jose Bonifacio, 1193, 16015-050 Aracatuba, SP, Brazil. E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Dias AGA, Magno MB, Delbem ACB, Cunha RF, Maia LC, Pessan JP. Clinical performance of glass ionomer cement and composite resin in Class II restorations in primary teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 2018; 73: 1–13. pii:S0300-5712(18)30073-3. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2018.04.004. [Epub ahead of print] Review. PubMed PMID: 29649506.
About this article
Cite this article
Jones, G., Taylor, G. Glass ionomer or composite resin for primary molars. Evid Based Dent 19, 86–87 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6401328
Effect of the restorative technique on load-bearing capacity, cusp deflection, and stress distribution of endodontically-treated premolars with MOD restoration
Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics (2019)