E-cigarette vapour is not inert and exposure can lead to cell damage

Question: What is the cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of short- and long-term e-cigarette vapour exposure on a panel of normal epithelial and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cell lines?

Abstract

Materials and methods

In vitro experiments were performed on normal epithelial cells as well as head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cell lines. The widely available cell line HaCat, a spontaneously transformed immortal keratinocyte and the HNSCC cell lines HN30 and UMSCC10B were used. Cells were exposed to nicotine-containing and nicotine-free vapour extract from two popular e-cigarette brands for periods ranging from 48 hours to eight weeks. Cytotoxicity was assessed using Annexin V flow cytometric analysis, trypan blue exclusion and clonogenic assays. Genotoxicity in the form of DNA strand breaks was quantified using the neutral comet assay and γ-H2AX immunostaining.

Results

E-cigarette-exposed cells showed significantly reduced cell viability and clonogenic survival, along with increased rates of apoptosis and necrosis, regardless of e-cigarette vapour nicotine content. They also exhibited significantly increased comet tail length and accumulation of γ-H2AX foci, demonstrating increased DNA strand breaks.

Conclusions

In conclusion, our study strongly suggests that electronic cigarettes are not as safe as their marketing makes them appear to the public. Our in vitro experiments employing two brands of e-cigs show that at biologically relevant doses, vapourised e-cig liquids induce increased DNA strand breaks and cell death, and decreased clono- genic survival in both normal epithelial and HNSCC cell lines independently of nicotine content. Further research is needed to definitively determine the long-term effects of e-cig usage, as well as whether the DNA damage shown in our study as a result of e-cig exposure will lead to mutations that ultimately result in cancer.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1

    Action on Smoking and Health (ASH), Use of electronic cigarettes (vapourisers) among adults in Great Britain. Factsheet. 2015. http://www.ash.org.uk/files/documents/ASH_891.pdf.

  2. 2

    McRobbie H, Bullen C, Hartmann-Boyce J, Hajek P . Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation and reduction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 12:CD 010216.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    McNeill A . Brose LS, Calder R, Hitchman SC, Hajek P, McRobbie H . E-cigarettes: an evidence update. A report commissioned by Public Health England. Public Health England, 2015 (PHE publications gateway number: 2015260).

  4. 4

    Yu V, Rahimy M, Korrapati A, et al. Electronic cigarettes induce DNA strand breaks and cell death independently of nicotine in cell lines. Oral Oncol 2016; 52: 58–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    EurekAlert!/AAAs, Press release: Cell harm seen in lab tests of e-cigarettes. Veterans Affairs Research Communications. http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2015-12/varc-chs122815.php [Accessed 26 February 2016]

  6. 6

    Knapton S . E-cigarettes are no safer than smoking tobacco, scientists warn. The Telegraph, 2015. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/news/12073221/E-cigarettes-are-no-safer-than-smoking-tobacco-scientists-warn.html [Accessed 26th February 2016]

  7. 7

    Bauld L . No, there's still no evidence e-cigarettes are as harmful as smoking. The Guardian, 2015. http://www.theguardian.com/science/sifting-the-evidence/2015/dec/31/no-theres-still-no-evidence-e-cigarettes-are-as-harmful-as-smoking [Accessed 26 February 2016]

  8. 8

    Johnson MD, Schilz J, Djordjevic MV, Rice JR, Shields PG . Evaluation of in vitro assays for assessing the toxicity of cigarette smoke and smokeless tobacco. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009; 18: 3263–3304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Thorne D, Adamson J . A review of in vitro cigarette smoke exposure systems. Exp Toxicol Pathol 2013; 65: 1183–1193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Ashley DL, Burns D, Djordjevic M, et al. The scientific basis of tobacco product regulation. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 2008; (951): p.1-277.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Burns DM, Dybing E, Gray N, et al. Mandated lowering of toxicants in cigarette smoke: a description of the World Health Organization TobReg proposal. Tob Control 2008; 17: 132–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Smoking-Toolkit-Study, Electronic cigarettes in England- latest trends. STS140122. 2015.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Address for correspondence: WM Ongkeko, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States

Yu V, Rahimy M, Korrapati A, et al. Electronic cigarettes induce DNA strand breaks and cell death independently of nicotine in cell lines. Oral Oncol 2016; 52: 58–65. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2015.10.018. Epub 2015 Nov 4. PubMed PMID: 26547127.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Holliday, R., Kist, R. & Bauld, L. E-cigarette vapour is not inert and exposure can lead to cell damage. Evid Based Dent 17, 2–3 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6401143

Download citation

Further reading