Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Trouble at the top

When it comes to high-quality research, the United States has no equal. It contributes a third of the authorship in the Nature Index, churning out almost as many papers as China, Germany and the United Kingdom combined. But there are signs of change in the global research arena.

The total number and global share of articles from the US has decreased since 2012, when the index began tracking high-quality research. The country's contribution to paper authorship has also declined at a faster pace, in absolute and relative terms.

This downward trend in high-quality research is reflected in the larger Web of Science (WoS) database. Between 2005 and 2015, the US share of highly cited papers fell faster than its share of total articles indexed in the WoS.

The research trajectory of the US is almost the reverse of China's, where publication numbers and author contribution have surged since 2012. If the current rate of change continues, China could be the top contributor to paper authorship in the index by 2027.

Almost every state has played a role in the country's decline in authorship. Reduced contributions from California, Massachusetts, New York and Maryland have made the biggest dent in weighted fractional count (WFC) over the past five years. However, five states have increased their contribution by a few points.

Analysts Scott Andes and Daniel Correa see the overall US decline as an inevitable by-product of a financially constrained research community, as they outline in a commentary (S13). Federal spending on research and development as a percentage of GDP has been receding since the 1960s. Barring an influx of funds, science and the economy will continue to suffer.

But publication numbers are only one instrument for diagnosing the health of a country's research ecosystem, as Julia Lane points out in her commentary (S14). US investment in alternative tools of analysis will lead to more efficient spending on science, and will invigorate the economy, Lane argues.

Drop in high-quality output

The contribution of the United States to the high-quality journals included in the Nature Index has declined in absolute and relative terms. Its share of authorship (WFC) has declined at a slightly faster rate than its share of articles (AC).

Credit: Source: Nature Index

Lower share of total output

The United States’ share of highly cited papers has decreased at a faster rate than its share of total articles indexed in the Web of Science (WoS) between 2005 and 2015.

Credit: Source: Web of Science

State performance

California (CA 3,067.3), on the west coast, contributes the most in weighted fractional count (WFC) to the share of authorship in the Nature Index in 2016, followed by several states on the east coast: Massachusetts (MA 1,656.7), New York (NY 1,453.4) and Maryland (MD 798).

Credit: Source: Nature Index

The majority of states have seen a decline in their contribution to the Nature Index between 2012 and 2016. This graph shows the percentage change of each state’s WFC between 2012 and 2016.



Source: Nature Index

Additional information

Data analysis by Aaron Ballagh, Bo Wu and David Pendlebury (Clarivate Analytics)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Trouble at the top. Nature 551, S8–S9 (2017).

Download citation


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing