An event that initially resembled an ordinary supernova explosion continued to erupt brightly for more than 600 days. Standard theoretical models cannot explain the event's properties. See Letter p.210
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Smartt, S. J. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 47, 63–106 (2009).
Anderson, J. P. et al. Astrophys. J. 786, 67 (2014).
Arcavi, I. et al. Nature 551, 210–213 (2017).
Li, W., Wang, X. & Zhang, T. Astron. Telegr. 6898 (2015).
Sukhbold, T. & Woosley, S. E. Astrophys. J. 820, L38 (2016).
Woosley, S. E. Astrophys. J. 836, 244–279 (2017).
Abbott, B. P. et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration) Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016).
Related links in Nature Research
About this article
Cite this article
Woosley, S. The star that would not die. Nature 551, 173–174 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/551173a