Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

New definitions of scientific units are on the horizon

This article has been updated

Metrologists are poised to change how scientists measure the Universe.

A sphere of pure silicon can be used to define a unit of measurement known as a mole. Credit: Natl. Phys. Lab., UK

Revamped definitions of scientific units are on their way. In the biggest overhaul of the international system of units (SI) since its inception in 1960, a committee is set to redefine four basic units — the ampere, the kilogram, the kelvin and the mole — using relationships to fundamental constants, rather than abstract or arbitrary definitions. The International Bureau of Weights and Measures is reviewing the plans at a meeting near Paris from 16 to 20 October. Its recommendations will then go before the General Conference on Weights and Measures, which oversees the SI system, in November 2018. The changes would take effect in May 2019. 

The kilogram is currently defined as the mass of a chunk of metal in a vault in Paris. And an imaginary experiment involving the force between two infinite wires defines the ampere, the unit of electrical current. The mole, meanwhile, is the amount of substance in a system with as many elementary entities as there are atoms in 0.012 kilograms of carbon-12, while the kelvin relates to the temperature and pressure at which water, ice and water vapour co-exist in equilibrium, known as the triple point of water. In the future, these units will be calculated in relation to constants — for example, the ampere will be based on the charge of an electron. 

Redefinition might not affect everyday measurements, but it will enable scientists working at the highest level of precision to do so in multiple ways, at any place or time and on any scale, without losing accuracy.

The problem

For measurements on conventional scales, existing definitions of SI units suffice. But they are poor tools for modern science at the extremes. And basing units on specific points or materials can be troublesome and inelegant, say metrologists. 

Credit: Source: Shaw, G. et al. Metrologia 53, A86–A94 (2016).

The techniques

Under the revamped SI system, researchers will be able to use various experiments to relate constants to each of the units measured.

Change history

  • 27 October 2017

    The graphic ‘All change’ has been updated to replace draft numbers for the definitions with final ones.


Related links

Related links

Related links in Nature Research

The new system of units 2016-Jan-07

Kilogram conflict resolved at last 2015-Oct-14

Hyper-precise atomic clocks face off to redefine time 2015-Jun-02

Gravity rivals join forces to nail down Big G 2014-Oct-08

Ampere to get rational redefinition 2014-Jan-14

Metrology: The new and improved kelvin 2009-Jun-17

Related external links

International Bureau of Weights and Measures

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gibney, E. New definitions of scientific units are on the horizon. Nature 550, 312–313 (2017).

Download citation

Further reading

  • Life after graduation: The new SI is here!

    • Vincenzo Marletta

    IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine (2019)

  • The 2019 surface acoustic waves roadmap

    • Per Delsing
    • , Andrew N Cleland
    • , Martin J A Schuetz
    • , Johannes Knörzer
    • , Géza Giedke
    • , J Ignacio Cirac
    • , Kartik Srinivasan
    • , Marcelo Wu
    • , Krishna Coimbatore Balram
    • , Christopher Bäuerle
    • , Tristan Meunier
    • , Christopher J B Ford
    • , Paulo V Santos
    • , Edgar Cerda-Méndez
    • , Hailin Wang
    • , Hubert J Krenner
    • , Emeline D S Nysten
    • , Matthias Weiß
    • , Geoff R Nash
    • , Laura Thevenard
    • , Catherine Gourdon
    • , Pauline Rovillain
    • , Max Marangolo
    • , Jean-Yves Duquesne
    • , Gerhard Fischerauer
    • , Werner Ruile
    • , Alexander Reiner
    • , Ben Paschke
    • , Dmytro Denysenko
    • , Dirk Volkmer
    • , Achim Wixforth
    • , Henrik Bruus
    • , Martin Wiklund
    • , Julien Reboud
    • , Jonathan M Cooper
    • , YongQing Fu
    • , Manuel S Brugger
    • , Florian Rehfeldt
    •  & Christoph Westerhausen

    Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics (2019)

  • Coherent control of single electrons: a review of current progress

    • Christopher Bäuerle
    • , D Christian Glattli
    • , Tristan Meunier
    • , Fabien Portier
    • , Patrice Roche
    • , Preden Roulleau
    • , Shintaro Takada
    •  & Xavier Waintal

    Reports on Progress in Physics (2018)


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing