News and Views

Astronomy: Ring detected around a dwarf planet

Observations of the distant dwarf planet Haumea constrain its size, shape and density, and reveal an encircling planetary ring. The discovery suggests that rings are not as rare in the Solar System as previously thought. See Letter p.219

Planetary rings capture the imagination with their stark beauty. Viewing Saturn and its extended ring system through even a small telescope is awe-inspiring and has drawn many people into studying science and engineering. In the Solar System, rings were thought to be present solely around the four giant planets (although only those of Saturn are easily visible from Earth). However, in the past few years, they have been unexpectedly identified around Centaurs1,2,3 — small bodies whose orbits lie between those of the giant planets. On page 219, Ortiz et al.4 report another piece of the planetary-rings puzzle, with the detection of a ring around the distant dwarf planet Haumea.

The outer Solar System has been a particularly rich region of discovery over the past two and a half decades. There are now known to be thousands of bodies located at or beyond the orbit of Neptune, called trans-Neptunian objects (TNOs). The revelation that some TNOs could be of similar size to Pluto prompted the International Astronomical Union, in 2006, to create a contentious class of object: dwarf planets.

Like ordinary planets, most dwarf planets orbit the Sun and are massive enough to reach hydrostatic equilibrium, which means that they are typically spherical in shape. For TNOs, the required mass corresponds to objects that have diameters larger than about 850 kilometres (if they are composed mainly of rock) or 200–400 km (if formed mainly of ice)5. Unlike ordinary planets, dwarf planets are defined as being bodies that have not cleared other material out of their orbital path.

Haumea is currently about 50 times farther from Earth than is the Sun. It is one of the largest known TNOs, although it is smaller than Pluto and the dwarf planet Eris. One of the most accurate methods for studying such remote objects is by stellar occultation, in which the light from a distant star is blocked by a foreground object. Ortiz and colleagues mapped the starlight blocked by Haumea to measure the dwarf planet's size, shape and density more accurately than ever before.

Compared with other bodies in the Solar System, Haumea rotates quickly (making one rotation in about four hours), and is strangely shaped, like an elongated egg. Ortiz et al. calculate that the object's longest axis is at least 2,300 km, which is larger than earlier estimates6,7,8. In turn, given known values for Haumea's mass and brightness, the dwarf planet's density and reflectivity are both lower than the unusually high values previously considered.

The authors' results suggest that Haumea might not be in hydrostatic equilibrium, and this touches on the still-sensitive topic of how planets and dwarf planets should be defined. Remarkably, the authors show that blinks in the starlight, detected at multiple observation sites both before and after a distant star was blocked by Haumea, are consistent with a 70-km-wide ring of material encircling the body, approximately 1,000 km away from Haumea's surface (Fig. 1).

Figure 1: Artist's impression of Haumea and its ring.
Figure 1

Ortiz et al.4 have measured the size, shape and density of the dwarf planet Haumea with unprecedented accuracy and found that it has a planetary ring. This is the first time that a ring has been discovered around a distant body in the Solar System. Image: Instituto de Astrofisica de Andalucia Csi

Saturn's are the most studied of all rings, and yet they remain enigmatic. Data from the Cassini spacecraft revealed that gravitational interactions between the planet's rings and moons shepherd the ring material, and that one of the rings is produced entirely from matter that spews from the moon Enceladus9,10. However, the formation mechanisms responsible for the other rings remain uncertain — possibilities include co-formation with the planet, break-up of a captured body or satellite and collisions between the planet and other bodies.

A key factor in differentiating between these possibilities is the age of Saturn's rings, but this is difficult to determine. The timescale for creating such massive rings, and the lack of dust, suggest an age of billions of years11. However, the rings' brightness, which is expected to lessen over time, points to a relatively young age of 150 million years12. It is even possible that some parts of the rings are old but others are young.

In the case of Haumea, more work is needed to determine the brightness of its ring and, in particular, to decouple the ring's reflectivity from that of the dwarf planet's surface. Ortiz and colleagues observe differences in the system's magnitude over time, caused by the ring changing from an edge-on to a face-on orientation. However, such differences aren't particularly well matched by the authors' initial models.

Haumea, its two moons and a handful of other TNOs have surfaces of nearly pure water ice, which is a feature not seen on any other TNO. The orbits of these unusual objects have been traced back to a common location13, which is strongly suggestive of the collisional break-up of one larger body. The age and dynamics of this collision will probably be key factors in studying the ring around Haumea.

“Ring systems represent microcosms of largerscale rotating structures, such as galaxies and proto-planetary disks.”

Ring systems represent microcosms of larger-scale rotating structures, such as galaxies and proto-planetary disks — the disks of dense gas and dust that surround newly formed stars. Understanding the basic physics of ring systems can therefore have wider implications. With the authors' discovery of a ring around a small body in the outer Solar System, which is in a completely different environment from the rings around the giant planets, the fundamental questions of how planetary rings form and evolve have become even more intriguing.

Scientists have just begun to try to explain the existence of two narrow, well-defined rings around two small Centaurs1,2,3 (with diameters of 200–250 km). Ortiz and colleagues' results require formation mechanisms that are applicable to an object that has 250 times the volume of these Centaurs and an elongated shape, is located substantially farther out in the Solar System and boasts a single ring that is ten times wider than those of the Centaurs.

Centaurs are thought to have originally been located farther out in the Solar System, and then gradually moved inward to their current orbits. Because these orbits are intertwined with those of the giant planets, they are gravitationally unstable and last for only millions of years. Numerical simulations have counter-intuitively demonstrated that rings around a Centaur are likely to survive the transition from the outer Solar System, including close encounters with the giant planets14. The authors' discovery prompts speculation that ring systems in the outer Solar System are not uncommon, and that we can anticipate more discoveries in this region.



  1. 1.

    et al. Nature 508, 72–75 (2014).

  2. 2.

    et al. Astron. Astrophys. 576, A18 (2015).

  3. 3.

    et al. Icarus 252, 271–276 (2015).

  4. 4.

    et al. Nature 550, 219–223 (2017).

  5. 5.

  6. 6.

    et al. Astrophys. J. 639, 1238–1251 (2006).

  7. 7.

    et al. Astron. Astrophys. 518, L147 (2010).

  8. 8.

    et al. Astron. Astrophys. 555, A15 (2013).

  9. 9.

    et al. Nature 437, 1326–1329 (2005).

  10. 10.

    et al. Science 311, 1416–1418 (2006).

  11. 11.

    Nature 468, 943–946 (2010).

  12. 12.

    et al. Icarus 294, 14–42 (2017).

  13. 13.

    , , & Nature 446, 294–296 (2007).

  14. 14.

    , & Astrophys. J. 824, 80 (2016).

Download references

Author information


  1. Amanda A. Sickafoose is at the South African Astronomical Observatory, Cape Town 7935, South Africa, and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA.

    • Amanda A. Sickafoose


  1. Search for Amanda A. Sickafoose in:

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amanda A. Sickafoose.