Springer Nature's reply on fake review

The publisher Springer Nature has already instituted the key process noted by Jian Gao and Tao Zhou to stamp out fake peer review (Nature 546, 33 (2017); Nature is editorially independent of Springer Nature). Since mid-2016 (or earlier for some journals), we have required authors who suggest unverified reviewers to supply an affiliation, institutional e-mail, ORCID ID and link to list of publications. We are also developing a rigorous reviewer-verification system for the whole of our business.

Earlier this year, we instituted the Springer Nature Research Integrity Group to deliver best practice and further training for staff and external editors. Springer Nature is committed to its role as guardian of the scientific record and to ensuring that all published content reaches appropriate editorial and ethical standards. We do not and will not hesitate to take action when problems are identified.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tamara Welschot.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Welschot, T. Springer Nature's reply on fake review. Nature 546, 210 (2017).

Download citation


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing