Correspondence | Published:

Gender bias: strategy to balance reviewers

Nature volume 543, page 40 (02 March 2017) | Download Citation

I have discovered a useful strategy to help counter gender bias in peer review — an obstacle that is particularly relevant to younger scientists (see also J. Lerback and B. Hanson Nature 541, 455–457; 2017).

When prospective referees decline an invitation to review a manuscript, many journals ask them to propose alternative reviewers. If I am asked to suggest people, I consciously nominate female colleagues for the task — especially early-career researchers or junior faculty members.

If the editor takes my advice and invites the nominated reviewer, colleagues (especially younger ones) are delighted and enthusiastic, knowing that undertaking peer review is an essential component of career building and being accepted into the scientific community.

Author information


  1. Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia.

    • Enzo Palombo


  1. Search for Enzo Palombo in:

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enzo Palombo.

About this article

Publication history




By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Newsletter Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing