Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.


Detecting particles of dark matter

Your article on the Axion Dark Matter eXperiment (ADMX) suggests that the lattice quantum chromodynamics (QCD) calculation by S. Borsanyi et al. (Nature 539, 69–71; 2016) might be bad news for the ADMX because it could place the axion mass beyond the detector's reach (see Nature; 2016). We find this inference misleading.

The axion is a very well-motivated hypothetical particle because it solves a puzzle in the standard model of elementary particles (the 'strong CP problem'; see J. E. Kim and G. Carosi Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 557; 2010) and because a cold population of axions is naturally produced in the early Universe that may constitute dark matter today.

The properties of the axion depend for the most part on a single parameter that may be taken as the axion mass. Unfortunately, the mass is poorly constrained and might plausibly range from 10−6 to 103 microelectronvolts. Inconclusive theoretical arguments have been put forth in support of each part of that range.

The only way to find out the axion mass is through experimental observation. Axion dark-matter detection methods are emerging that, in principle, cover the whole mass range. Experiments that use the resonant cavity technique, such as ADMX, are capable of discovering axions today. They should be vigorously pursued. The aforementioned lattice QCD calculation does not change this fundamental picture.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pierre Sikivie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, J., Sikivie, P. & Weinberg, S. Detecting particles of dark matter. Nature 541, 464 (2017).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing