Correspondence | Published:

Cities: factor in their biological impact

Nature volume 540, page 39 (01 December 2016) | Download Citation

Richard Forman and Jianguo Wu identify several zones around the world that might be suitable for future urbanization (Nature 537, 608–611; 2016). We suggest that the problem of supporting a growing population needs to be considered from a biological as well as an urban-planning perspective: 'suitable' is not necessarily synonymous with 'biologically sustainable'.

The authors propose that urbanization should avoid biodiversity hotspots — regions that are rich in endemic species and undergoing rapid habitat loss. But this would exclude highly biodiverse yet well-conserved areas, which also need environmental protection.

Forman and Wu also call for global-scale planning. Until that is properly coordinated, governments should not view natural ecosystems as offering potential accommodation for the next billion people. Instead, they need to maximize land-use potential while minimizing its biological impact — for example, by improving cities and the surrounding lands that feed them, and by promoting biodiversity research and protection in conserved areas.

We probably do not need more “suitable” land: we need to make sustainable and efficient use of the land we already live on.

Author information


  1. University of Gothenburg and Gothenburg Botanical Garden, Sweden.

    • Alexandre Antonelli
  2. Forest Cat Editing, Uppsala, Sweden.

    • Allison Perrigo


  1. Search for Alexandre Antonelli in:

  2. Search for Allison Perrigo in:

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandre Antonelli.

About this article

Publication history




By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Newsletter Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing