Richard Forman and Jianguo Wu identify several zones around the world that might be suitable for future urbanization (Nature 537, 608–611; 2016). We suggest that the problem of supporting a growing population needs to be considered from a biological as well as an urban-planning perspective: 'suitable' is not necessarily synonymous with 'biologically sustainable'.
The authors propose that urbanization should avoid biodiversity hotspots — regions that are rich in endemic species and undergoing rapid habitat loss. But this would exclude highly biodiverse yet well-conserved areas, which also need environmental protection.
Forman and Wu also call for global-scale planning. Until that is properly coordinated, governments should not view natural ecosystems as offering potential accommodation for the next billion people. Instead, they need to maximize land-use potential while minimizing its biological impact — for example, by improving cities and the surrounding lands that feed them, and by promoting biodiversity research and protection in conserved areas.
We probably do not need more “suitable” land: we need to make sustainable and efficient use of the land we already live on.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Antonelli, A., Perrigo, A. Cities: factor in their biological impact. Nature 540, 39 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/540039a
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/540039a