Scientists are beginning to understand why these ‘mini Wall Streets’ work so well at forecasting election results — and how they sometimes fail.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Open Access articles citing this article.
Critical Care Open Access 05 June 2017
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Open Science Collaboration Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 7, 657–660 (2012).
Open Science Collaboration Science 349, aac4716 (2015).
Dreber, A. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 15343–15347 (2015).
Berg, J. E., Nelson, F. D. & Rietz, T. A. Int. J. Forecast. 24, 285–300 (2008).
Treynor, J. L. Financ. Anal. J. 43, 50–53 (1987).
Almenberg, J., Kittlitz, K. & Pfeiffer, T. PLoS ONE 4, e8500 (2009).
Rosenbloom, E. S. & Notz, W. Electron. Mark. 16, 63–69 (2006).
Servan-Schreiber, E., Wolfers, J., Pennock, D. M. & Galebach, B. Electron. Mark. 14, 243–251 (2004).
Camerer, C. F. et al. Science 351, 1433–1436 (2016).
Related links in Nature Research
Related external links
About this article
Cite this article
Mann, A. The power of prediction markets. Nature 538, 308–310 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/538308a
This article is cited by
Empirical Software Engineering (2023)
Critical Care (2017)