News & Views | Published:

In retrospect

Sixty years of living polymers

Nature volume 536, pages 276277 (18 August 2016) | Download Citation

In the 1950s, the discovery of a class of 'living' polymerization reaction revolutionized the field of polymer science by providing a way of controlling the molecular-weight distribution of polymers. The effects reverberate to this day.

One of the triumphs of modern polymer science is the exquisite control that synthetic chemists have achieved in the design and execution of polymerization reactions1. A key concept on which this control is based was discussed 60 years ago by Michael Szwarc2 in a classic paper in Nature. He reported 'living' polymerization reactions, in which each addition of a monomer to a growing chain is irreversible and, when the pool of monomers is exhausted, the ends of the polymer chain remain active so that further chemistry can take place. Szwarc's findings have been applied to a wide range of polymerizations, and are responsible not only for major industrial applications, but also for advancing the theory of polymer science3.

In the early 1950s, typical laboratory polymerizations produced a mixture of molecules of different chain lengths because the reactions were reversible — monomers could detach from polymer chains, rather than irreversibly adding to them, and random termination reactions could occur, preventing further chain growth and causing even broader chain-length distributions. Theoretical considerations suggested that many of the properties of polymers depend on both the average molecular chain length and the chain-length distribution. Polymer scientists therefore required samples that were both well characterized and of controlled length to test fundamental theories. Early efforts to carry out such evaluations required extremely tedious fractionations of polymer samples to obtain appropriate test materials. The idea that irreversible polymerizations would produce polymers that have narrow molecular-weight distributions had been proposed by the chemist Paul Flory4 in 1940, but little progress towards such reactions was made until Szwarc's paper appeared.

Szwarc received his degree in chemical engineering from the Warsaw University of Technology in 1932, but wisely chose to emigrate to Israel in 1935, before the start of the Second World War. He received his PhD in organic chemistry in 1942 from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. In 1945, he joined the research group of Michael Polanyi — a polymath who made great contributions to physical chemistry — at the University of Manchester, UK, earning another PhD in physical chemistry in 1947, and a DSc in 1949. He joined the faculty as a senior lecturer, but then moved to the United States in 1952 to become professor of physical chemistry and polymers at the New York State College of Forestry in Syracuse. The University of Manchester was the pre-eminent place for research in polymers in Britain during the period Szwarc was there, and he was determined to continue this research at Syracuse.

Good things happen when a truly prepared mind is exposed to an otherwise disappointing result, and so it was for Szwarc. He heard reports of an 'unwanted' polymerization reaction that occurs between the radical anion of naphthalene and the monomer styrene (a radical anion is a compound that bears both a negative charge and an unpaired electron; in this case, the electron serves as an initiator for the polymerization reaction). Further studies by Szwarc found that the initial product of this reaction is another chemically active radical anion that reacts irreversibly with more styrene to produce an intriguing polymer. This reactive polymer was indefinitely stable when stored in a dry, oxygen-free solvent, but the active chain ends could be terminated — chemically inactivated — at will by adding a little moisture. This is the kind of polymer envisaged by Flory in 1940.

The realization of a chemical route to a living polymer produced a flurry of research5, and many different polymers with narrow molecular-weight distributions were produced. Polymer physicists (such as myself) were thrilled, because it allowed materials to be prepared that could test our theories. But Szwarc realized that synthetic organic chemists would be even more pleased, because a different monomer could be added to the living polymer to produce a block copolymer: molecules that contain long, uniform runs of different monomers.

Block copolymers have become major commercial successes — for example, the whole field of thermoplastic elastomers is based on this technology. Thermoplastic elastomers are rubbery solids that, unlike conventional rubbers, can be reused by heating them to temperatures above their glass transition temperature, remoulding them and then rapidly cooling them (the glass transition temperature is the range of temperatures in which amorphous materials pass from a liquid state to a hard, glassy substance). Apart from block copolymers, a dizzying number of other polymeric molecular structures engineered by living polymerization are also now available (Fig. 1). Szwarc received international recognition for the synthetic aspect of his work when he was awarded the Kyoto Prize for advanced technology in 1991.

Figure 1: Living polymerization reactions allow control of polymeric structures.
Figure 1

In the early 1950s, most polymerization reactions produced a mixture of molecules of different chain lengths — a wide molecular-weight distribution. In 1956, Szwarc2 reported a 'living' polymerization reaction that allowed much greater control of the products, and which therefore yielded a much narrower molecular-weight distribution. Living polymerizations have since been used to make a wide array of polymer structures, including block copolymers (which contain more than one type of monomer), molecular brushes and polymer-modified particles and surfaces.

A development that was greatly aided by the routine availability of polymers with a narrow molecular-weight distribution was the scaling theory that allows many polymer properties to be expressed in terms of molecular weight. For example, in 1950, Flory and Thomas Fox determined an equation6 that accurately expressed the glass transition temperature as a function of molecular weight. The improved polystyrene samples available after 1956 confirmed this prediction7.

A crucial property of pure liquid polymers is their viscosity. Flory and Fox discovered8 that, for high-molecular-weight polymers, the viscosity increases in proportion to the molecular weight raised to the power of 3.4, and they proposed a theory to explain this finding. This means that, even well above the glass transition temperature, such polymers can have a high viscosity and behave like a soft solid. That may seem an obscure finding, but it has practical applications — such as the polymeric 'solvent' used in advanced batteries that do not leak. Again, Szwarc's discovery allowed Flory and Fox's theory to be validated.

One of the theoretically most challenging issues in scaling theory was the molecular-weight dependence of the osmotic pressure of polymer solutions. This is of interest because many industrial polymers are used in solution, and because biologists require an understanding of naturally occurring polymer solutions. The physicist Pierre-Gilles de Gennes correctly intuited9 that, because linear polymer chains in solution are 'swollen' by the solvent, the osmotic pressure will have a different molecular-weight dependence from that predicted by classical theory. Measurements10 of osmotic pressure for solutions encompassing wide ranges of concentration and molecular weight confirmed de Gennes' predictions. Both Flory and de Gennes received a Nobel prize for their work in polymer science and condensed-matter science, respectively.

Many theoretically challenging issues remain to be solved in polymer science, and the synergistic relationship between theory and the availability of well-defined polymer samples will greatly aid this effort. For instance, rubbery materials are widespread in industry and in biology, yet the theory of rubber elasticity is yet to be fully validated. The chemistry of living polymers also remains a highly active area11, with hundreds of investigators worldwide. Many synthetic routes to living polymers have been developed, and a wide range of monomers can now be used in this approach. The concept of living polymers has truly revolutionized the practice of polymer science.

Notes

References

  1. 1.

    & Prog. Polym. Sci. 31, 1039–1040 (2006).

  2. 2.

    Nature 178, 1168–1169 (1956).

  3. 3.

    et al. J. Polym. Sci. A 45, 2576–2579 (2007).

  4. 4.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc. 62, 1561–1565 (1940).

  5. 5.

    Living Polymers and Mechanisms of Anionic Polymerization; Adv. Polym. Sci. 49 (Springer, 1983).

  6. 6.

    & J. Appl. Phys. 21, 581–591 (1950).

  7. 7.

    Viscoelastic Properties of Polymers 3rd edn (Wiley, 1980).

  8. 8.

    & J. Phys. Chem. 55, 221–234 (1951).

  9. 9.

    Scaling Concepts in Polymer Physics (Cornell Univ. Press, 1979).

  10. 10.

    Physical Chemistry of Macromolecules Ch. 5 (CRC Press, 2007).

  11. 11.

    Macromolecules 45, 4015–4039 (2012).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Gary Patterson is in the Department of Chemistry, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA.

    • Gary Patterson

Authors

  1. Search for Gary Patterson in:

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gary Patterson.

About this article

Publication history

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/536276a

Further reading

  • Living Nanocrystals

    • Adam W. Jansons
    • , L. Kenyon Plummer
    •  & James E. Hutchison

    Chemistry of Materials (2017)

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Newsletter Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing