Correspondence | Published:

Research funding

Reform oversight of Italy's science funds

Nature volume 533, page 179 (12 May 2016) | Download Citation

We wish to highlight the stark contrast between the hardship in Italy's publicly funded research community (see G. Parisi Nature 530, 33; 2016) and the reportedly largely unused sums of money allocated to a single research institute over the past 12 years.

After 3 years without any financial provision for bottom-up research, Italy's government is providing €31 million (US$36 million) a year for the next 3 years to cover research in the humanities as well as science. Of this year's 4,431 grant applications for this modest sum, just 300–500 will be successful.

By contrast, the government plans to inject €150 million a year for the next 10 years into the Human Technopole project, which will focus on genomics, big data, ageing and nutrition. The recipient is the Italian Institute of Technology in Genoa, which is self-governing and so not publicly accountable — despite the large sums of public money involved. A recent report indicates that half of the institute's funds remained unspent in 2010–14 (see go.nature.com/vouywf; in Italian).

The government should establish an adequately funded agency that has transparent jurisdiction over the funding and execution of research. The agency would also monitor the progress of the Human Technopole and oversee its accountability. (See also go.nature.com/hgfplj.)

Notes

  1. 1.

    See News page 158.

Author information

Author notes

    • Ernesto Carafoli
    •  & Cesare Montecucco

    *Supported by 13 signatories (see Supplementary information for full list).

Affiliations

  1. Venetian Institute of Molecular Medicine, Padua, Italy.

    • Ernesto Carafoli
  2. University of Padua, Italy.

    • Cesare Montecucco

Authors

  1. Search for Ernesto Carafoli in:

  2. Search for Cesare Montecucco in:

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ernesto Carafoli.

Supplementary information

About this article

Publication history

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/533179c

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Newsletter Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing