In the Comment 'Cracking the Indus script' (A. Robinson Nature 526, 499–501; 2015 ), the sentence about Bryan Wells's estimate of the number of Indus script signs has been revised to more accurately reflect Wells's contributions. He estimated the number of signs at 676, not 958.
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found at 10.1038/526499a
The online version of the original article can be found at 10.1038/526499a
Related links
Related links
Related links in Nature Research
Related external links
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Correction. Nature 532, 308 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/532308a
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/532308a
This article is cited by
-
A different take on Indus evidence
Nature (2016)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
