Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:


A sisterly dispute

Which phylum first branched off from the animal phylogenetic tree is a contested issue. A new analysis challenges the proposal that comb jellies are the sister group to all other animals, and emphasizes a 'sponges-first' view. Three evolutionary biologists weigh up the evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: The animal tree.


  1. See all news & views


  1. Pisani, D. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 15402–15407 (2015).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Whelan, N. V., Kocot, K. M., Moroz, L. L. & Halanych, K. M. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 5773–5778 (2015).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ryan, J. F. et al. Science 342, 1242592 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Moroz, L. L. et al. Nature 510, 109–114 (2014).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jékely, G., Paps, J. & Nielsen, C. EvoDevo 6, 1 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Marlow, H. & Arendt, D. Curr. Biol. 24, R757–R761 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Philippe, H. et al. Curr. Biol. 19, 706–712 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lartillot, N., Lepage, T. & Blanquart, S. Bioinformatics 25, 2286–2288 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Felsenstein, J. Syst. Biol. 27, 401–410 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Felsenstein, J. Evolution 46, 159–173 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Borowiec, M. L., Lee, E. K., Chiu, J. C. & Plachetzki, D. C. BMC Genomics 16, 987 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chang, E. S. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 14912–14917 (2015).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Moroz, L. L. Commun. Integr. Biol. 7, e993269 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Moore, J. & Willmer, P. Biol. Rev. Camb. Phil. Soc. 72, 1–60 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Moroz, L. L. & Kohn, A. B. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 371, 20150041 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Steinmetz, P. R. H. et al. Nature 487, 231–234 (2012).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Moroz, L. L. & Kohn, A. B. Integr. Comp. Biol. 55, 1028–1049 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Mah, J. L., Christensen-Dalsgaard, K. K. & Leys, S. P. Evol. Dev. 16, 25–37 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Antcliffe, J. B., Callow, R. H. T. & Brasier, M. D. Biol. Rev. 89, 972–1004 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Maximilian J. Telford, Leonid L. Moroz or Kenneth M. Halanych.

Related links

Related links

Related links in Nature Research

Evolutionary biology: Excitation over jelly nerves

Evolutionary biology: Muscle's dual origins

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Telford, M., Moroz, L. & Halanych, K. A sisterly dispute. Nature 529, 286–287 (2016).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research