Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

‘Pretty curious’ campaign draws criticism

Online commenters ridicule the name of an effort to boost girls’ interest in scientific careers.

An engineering apprentice works at EDF Energy, a UK power company, which launched a programme to promote women and girls in STEM. Credit: EDF Energy

Scientists generally laud attempts to get more young people interested in careers in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). But an initiative to encourage girls to study science — launched by EDF Energy, a London-based power company— has met much scepticism and ridicule online, mostly because of the campaign’s name: ‘Pretty Curious’. Michelle Kline, an anthropologist at Arizona State University in Tempe, tweeted:

The company responded to one critic by tweeting:

Announcing the campaign, EDF Energy said that Pretty Curious will “inspire teenage girls by creating hands-on experiences”. During one-day sessions across the United Kingdom, girls will have the chance to create ‘smart bedrooms’ using electronic kits. The company has also produced a YouTube video featuring four female role models at the centre of the campaign, including a chemical engineer who works at the energy company, a cosmetic scientist, a computer scientist who developed a fashion app and a television presenter with a master’s degree in wildlife biology.

Helen Spencer, a museum consultant who is studying for a PhD in medieval glass analysis at Heriot-Watt University in Edinburgh, UK, commented on Twitter that the video seemed to be reinforcing gender stereotypes.

Dan Lambden, a London-based public-relations consultant who is not part of the campaign, responded:

Karen James, a geneticist and conservationist at MDI Biological Laboratory in Salisbury Cove, Maine, tweeted:

James said in an interview that the idea behind the initiative seems misguided. “The assumption that all or even most girls are into pretty things and want to be pretty, and that it’s a potential mechanism to interest them in STEM, is sexism,” she says.

Speaking to Nature, Kline notes that the word ‘pretty’ can have a meaning beyond physical appeal. “Pretty curious is the same as saying a little bit curious,” she says. “In reality, most scientists, regardless of gender identity, are supremely curious.”

In a statement to Nature, EDF Energy said: “We knew the name would attract attention and chose it in order to raise awareness of the campaign.” The company also says that encouraging women and girls to enter STEM careers is a “critical issue for us” because the firm needs a “diverse, skilled workforce” and because the United Kingdom overall is facing a shortage of engineers. “Whether one likes the language or not [of the campaign’s name], the issue facing the UK is real, and we are determined to use our business to be part of the solution.”

For more, see


Related links

Related links

Related links in Nature Research

Gender-disparity study faces attack 2015-Sep-24

Sexist review causes Twitter storm 2015-May-01

Hidden hurdle for women in science 2015-Jan-15

Related external links

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Woolston, C. ‘Pretty curious’ campaign draws criticism. Nature 526, 167 (2015).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing