Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Cosmology: A story of cosmic proportions

Michael S. Turner weighs up two distinctive popular books on the evolution of the Universe.

Origins: The scientific story of creation

Oxford University Press: 2015. 9780198707646 | ISBN: 978-0-1987-0764-6

Dark Matter and the Dinosaurs: The Astounding Interconnectedness of the Universe

Ecco: 2015. 9780062328472 | ISBN: 978-0-0623-2847-2

Jim Baggott's Origins and Lisa Randall's Dark Matter and the Dinosaurs recount the greatest story ever told: the evolution of the Universe since the Big Bang. This rich cross-disciplinary tale reminds us that astronomy, physics, chemistry, geoscience, biology and neuroscience are interconnected. The books cover the same ground in very different styles. Baggott, a chemist turned science writer, takes the reader on a linear, 13.8-billion-year journey. His textbook-like treatment abounds with excellent visuals, from charts to lithographs. At its best, Origins reminds me of Richard Holmes's marvellous The Age of Wonder (HarperCollins, 2008).

Randall, a particle physicist and cosmologist, makes the epic trip more succinct and conversational, interspersing her passions, perspectives and creative analogies. Describing how astronomers 'see' dark matter, she uses the analogy of knowing that a celebrity is near because of disrupted traffic and crowds of phone-wielding people. Her strong opinions — even ones I question, such as suggesting that “transparent matter” might be a better name than dark matter — liven the narrative.

Credit: Illustrations by Karolis Strautniekas/

The story begins with the Big Bang. What it is — the origin of matter, energy, space and time as Einstein's general theory of relativity has it, the emergence of space and time as string theory might posit, or the outcome of a previous cycle of cosmic evolution — remains to be determined. Inflation follows: a burst of expansion that smooths and flattens the Universe and stretches quantum fluctuations to astrophysical size, to become the seeds for all structure in the Universe. The details have yet to be revealed. But evidence for inflation is growing, particularly in measurements of tiny variations in the temperature of the cosmic microwave background radiation.

This 'quark soup' phase lasts a microsecond, followed by nucleosynthesis and the formation of the lightest elements at 3 minutes. Atoms form at 380,000 years. Then gravity amplifies lumpiness in the distribution of matter to become galaxies, clusters of galaxies and superclusters, with the first stars and galaxies emerging at around 500 million years. The Sun forms some 9 billion years later.

Now the narratives turn to 'local' events: Solar System formation, Earth's cooling, the emergence of oceans — and, 3.5 billion years ago, the first life forms. Important questions remain. Where did organic material originate? How did the transition from inorganic to organic occur? What was the last universal common ancestor, which Charles Darwin described as the primordial form from which all living things on Earth descend? From here, the pace quickens: multicellular organisms, atmospheric oxygenation around 2.5 billion years ago, sex as a mechanism for gene exchange, the emergence of primates shortly after the dinosaurs' demise and, some 200,000 years ago, Homo sapiens.

Baggott ends at consciousness, that frontier of interdisciplinarity. But he fails to ask whether intelligent life is a convergent property of evolution. Given that evolution involves dominating local resources, the Universe may teem with 'dumb' life, while intelligent life remains exceedingly rare.

Earth's prehistory was marked by five major extinctions, identified in 1982 by palaeontologists David Raup and John Sepkoski. The Cretaceous–Palaeogene extinction 66 million years ago, which killed the dinosaurs, is the best known. Physicist Luis Alvarez and his geologist son Walter proposed that the cause was an asteroid impact, an idea met with scepticism until the mid-1990s, after a crater fitting the bill was identified in Mexico. Such an impact can alter conditions on Earth for tens of years, through a global dust cloud, firestorms and other after-effects: species ill-suited to such dramatic change go extinct.

Raup and Sepkoski also put forth evidence that extinction events occur roughly every 30 million years. This is now generally accepted, but there is no agreed mechanism. Randall and her collaborator Matt Reece offer a hypothesis. They posit that there are two kinds of dark matter: the ordinary one, whose gravity binds galaxies and galaxy clusters, and a 'social' form that also interacts with its own kind. The social dark matter forms a thin disk of material in our Galaxy whose gravity can shake things loose in the outer depths of the Solar System when it crosses the Galactic disk, every 30 million years or so. Randall admits that the idea is a long shot, although testable. This aspect of Dark Matter and the Dinosaurs conveys the excitement and uncertainty of cutting-edge, big-idea research.

In a chapter called 'The cosmic imperative', Baggott implies that the evolution of life is an inevitable consequence of chemistry, despite our not knowing precisely how it occurred. This reminded me of physicist Murray Gell-Mann's dictum “Everything not forbidden is compulsory” (borrowed from novelist T. H. White), which describes the importance of symmetry principles in particle physics: they set the basic rules, but not the detailed outcomes. A rich set of rules (think chess) can lead to complex and interesting outcomes. I would take this further: the Universe is governed by physical laws that permit a rich set of behaviours, resulting in its inevitable evolution from vacuum energy to quark soup, nuclei and atoms, all the way to the emergence of life and self-awareness. But that does not explain where space, time and the laws came from, or why there is something rather than nothing.

I have quibbles with Baggott's book. He gives a dated picture of inflation (tying it to symmetry breaking), gets the temperature of the cosmic microwave background wrong (it is 2.7255 kelvin) and calls the lumpiness that led to the formation of cosmic structures anisotropy, rather than inhomogeneity. But these gaffes do not interfere with the larger narrative and are a by-product of his sweeping scope and detailed description.

The longing to understand our place in the cosmos is universal. Baggott and Randall lay out how much of the story we understand, and how interconnected it all is. They remind us that big questions remain in this most wonderful scientific adventure.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael S. Turner.

Related links

Related links

Related links in Nature Research

Origins of life: An improbable journey

History of science: Pursuing the primordial

Related external links

Lisa Randall

Jim Baggott

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Turner, M. Cosmology: A story of cosmic proportions. Nature 526, 40–41 (2015).

Download citation


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing