Stephen Bradforth and colleagues' discussion of what is needed to develop “a science-literate population” (Nature 523, 282–284; 2015) echoes the words of a Nature editorial 50 years ago, entitled 'New thinking in undergraduate teaching' (Nature 205, 835; 1965).
According to the editorial, “the student is in danger of spending too much of his [sic] limited time memorizing facts, and has insufficient time at his disposal to master the principles underlying his subject and to develop his powers of thought”. It continues: “the most important purpose of a university education is to teach the student to think for himself ... it may on occasion demand a re-examination of the whole approach to a subject in undergraduate courses.” Indeed.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Winkler, B. Education reforms ring true 50 years on. Nature 525, 321 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/525321f
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/525321f