Correspondence | Published:

Institutions

Funders must not coerce scientists

Nature volume 524, page 291 (20 August 2015) | Download Citation

The reported complicity of the American Psychological Association (APA) in the 'enhanced interrogation' programme of the US Department of Defense (DOD) represents improper exploitation by the DOD of its relationship with the APA in pursuit of its own objectives, distorting scientific ethics and practices in the process (see Nature 523, 255; 2015). The scientific community as a whole could learn from the mechanisms that the DOD used to influence the APA, as reported in an independent review (go.nature.com/4vpdob).

Historically, similarly inappropriate relationships have sometimes developed between granting agencies and scientists (see, for example, S. Reverby Examining Tuskegee (Univ. North Carolina Press, 2009) and Nature 467, 645; 2010). Scientists' alignment with institutional preferences is often a force for good, but vigilance is needed to prevent erosion of ethical or evidential standards.

Institutional coercion such as that revealed in the report is disastrous for the public perception and integrity of science. The moral force of research standards is weakened if they are subject to political concerns.

We all need to address this potential for abuse without impeding the normal functioning of scientists and their granting institutions. For example, negotiations on ethics and research practices between institutions could be overseen to ensure good-faith participation and eliminate any back-door dealing. Such regulatory authority could be absorbed by existing bodies such as the US Federal Inspectors General.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. University of California, San Francisco, USA.

    • Cole Helsell

Authors

  1. Search for Cole Helsell in:

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cole Helsell.

About this article

Publication history

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/524291d

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Newsletter Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing