Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.


Mind the gap in Hunt responses

In my view, you use your publishing might irresponsibly in presenting Alessia Errico's article 'Judge by actions, not words' as the sole female riposte to Nobel laureate Tim Hunt's misogynistic remarks (Nature 522, 393; 2015).

Besides running contrary to the groundswell of reaction from many scientists (see, for example,, Errico's statement of support for Hunt's remarks was predictable. Hunt was her former supervisor: she depended on him for scholarship and career advancement.

Whether or not Hunt was joking and whether or not he apologized satisfactorily are beside the point. Neither is it likely that such outdated and seemingly entrenched attitudes can be dispelled by practical attempts to counter gender inequality in science (see Nature 522, 255; 2015 and D. Hilton Nature 523, 7; 2015).

Conspicuous by its absence in Nature so far is this: a woman commenting on the harm done by the flippant public denigration of women in science by a prominent scientist who is male.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca Williams Jackson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jackson, R. Mind the gap in Hunt responses. Nature 523, 290 (2015).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing