Introduction

Asthma is a common disorder, characterised by airflow obstruction, bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) and airway inflammation.1 Individuals with chronic asthma often develop irreversible structural changes in their airways from abnormal repair and remodelling processes.2 Airway remodelling is associated with epithelial damage, smooth muscle hyperplasia and increased matrix deposition3 and these structural changes are likely to be associated with some of the symptoms of asthma,4 including suboptimal responses to corticosteroids, persistent BHR and progressive decline in lung function in asthmatics with severe and/or chronic disease.5 It has been suggested that airway remodelling is a consequence of an aberrant injury/repair response driven by the inflammatory process,6 hence the genes encoding molecules modulating the injury/repair response are potentially good candidates for so-called asthma genes.

The ADAM (a disintegrin and a metalloproteinase) family is a subgroup of the metzincin metalloproteinase superfamily, implicated in cell–cell and cell–matrix interactions,7 cell migration, cell adhesion8 and signal transduction,9, 10 and responsible for the proteolytic removal of extracellular domains of numerous transmembrane proteins in a process known as ectoderm shedding.11 ADAM17, or TACE (TNFα-converting enzyme), is responsible for the cleavage of the membrane-bound form of TNFα to release the active cytokine, and is the most extensively studied member of the ADAM family.12

ADAM33 has been shown to be expressed in lung fibroblasts and bronchial smooth muscle13, 14 and the protein has been detected in lung tissue, smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts.15 Recently, several polymorphisms in the ADAM33 gene have been shown to be significantly associated with asthma, BHR13 and atopy.16 Taken together, these findings suggest an important role for ADAM33 in airway remodelling and hence asthma.13

We sought to confirm the association between polymorphisms in the ADAM33 gene and asthma, and to examine the association with disease severity, in a large Australian Caucasian population of nonasthmatic controls and patients with mild, moderate and severe asthma, using high throughput MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry and the MassARRAY multiplex genotyping system.17

Materials and methods

Subjects

The case–control population recruited for the association study has been described elsewhere, in a study protocol approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Western Australia.18 Briefly, 612 patients with asthma and 473 nonasthmatic controls participated in this study. The sample was ethnically homogeneous. All patients were Caucasian and the country of birth of all four grandparents was known for 50% of subjects. Of all grandparents, 96% came from Northern Europe or Australia. Asthma was defined as doctor-diagnosed asthma and the nonasthmatic control subjects had no history of asthma. All participants were unrelated and between 18 and 89 years of age, all gave written informed consent and completed a comprehensive questionnaire, which assisted in phenotype assessment. Approximately 15 ml of blood were obtained from each participant, followed by assessment of lung function by spirometry, and assessment of atopic status, based on a skin prick reaction (wheal >3 mm) to at least one of five common aeroallergens: cat, dog, house dust mite, mould mix and grass pollen mix.

Disease severity

Patients were allocated to different asthma severity groups using criteria slightly modified from those specified by the Australian National Asthma Council, Australia19 as well as the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) Expert Panel Report.18, 20

DNA extraction

Genomic DNA was extracted from blood buffy coats using the QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and following the manufacturers’ instructions.

Selection of SNPs

We selected 10 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the ADAM33 gene, which previously had been shown to have an allelic and/or haplotype association with asthma, including F_+1 (rs511898), Q_−1 (rs612709), S_1 (rs3918396), ST_+4 (rs44707), ST_+7 (rs574174), V_−2 (rs628977), V_−1 (rs543749), V_2 (rs3918400), V_4 (rs2787094), V_5 (rs3746631).13 One additional SNP previously found to be associated with asthma,13 V_−3 (rs628977) did not assay successfully, however, given the moderate to strong levels of Linkage disequilibrium (LD) of SNPs previously documented, we expected the 10 SNPs studied to capture most of the haplotypic variation.

PCR amplification and genotypic analysis

Genotyping of the 10 SNPs was performed using the MassARRAY system (Sequenom Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), commercially available through the Australian Genome Research Facility (Brisbane, Australia). Using the unique rs accession numbers, SNP details and sequence data are available through NCBI databases (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). Briefly, following PCR amplification, primer extension products were analysed by chip-based MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Primers were designed using Sequenom software and the extension reaction produced allele-specific extension products with masses differing by 300 Da, or approximately a single nucleotide. Primer extension and PCR were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions, using AmpliTaq DNA polymerase (Perkin-Elmer, CA, USA). After desalting of the reaction products (SpectroCLEAN, Sequenom), approximately 10 nl were loaded into a SpectroCHIP (Sequenom) and analysed in the fully automated mode with the MALDI-TOF MassARRAY system (Sequenom). SpectroTYPER software (Sequenom) automatically called genotypes and only conservative and moderate calls were accepted for this study.

Statistical analyses

Genotype and allele frequencies were calculated for each patient group. Initial analyses compared the SNP allele frequencies across the nonasthmatic controls and varying asthma severity (mild, moderate and severe asthma) using ordinal logistic regression analysis. LD between the markers was calculated as Lewontin's D’,using Cocaphase.21 Models were fitted both including and excluding covariates, including age, gender and smoking status.

Association was assessed under a multiplicative penetrance model, comparing haplotypes spanning all 10 SNPs between controls and cases, present at a frequency of at least 0.5%, and statistical significance assessed via a permutation procedure. Haplotype-based analysis was performed using the scoring approach of Schaid et al,22 as implemented in the R-statistical language.23 and using Cocaphase.21 Under the scoring approach of Schaid et al,22 the probability of each possible haplotype for each individual is inferred using an EM algorithm and these probabilities are weighted and used to perform logistic regression analysis with haplotype as the predictive variable. This approach avoids problems implicit in assigning each person a definite haplotype when phase is unknown. Cocaphase21 also uses an EM approach to establish haplotype probabilities for each person. The score-based global or omnibus test for haplotypic association included all haplotypes with a frequency above 0.5% in the analysis and therefore did not suffer from the problem of multiple tests. If the global test was significant, we then performed subhaplotype analysis to infer which SNPs were important in driving the association. A simulation-based P-value gets around the problem of missing data biasing the results. Analysis of disease severity included the controls/nonasthma group as we were looking for a dose–response effect. Exact conditional testing for association between asthma and unphased genotypes at multiple SNPs was performed using importance sampling for the appropriate log-linear model.24, 25

For the meta-analysis, we extracted haplotype frequencies from two other studies that published these frequencies16, 26 and combined them with our study in a log-linear analysis.

Results

In total, 612 patients with asthma and 473 nonasthmatic controls participated in this study. All patients were unrelated and Caucasian in origin, and patients with asthma were subdivided by disease severity as described elsewhere.18 Table 1 illustrates the demographics of the population. All groups had similar age and gender distributions, although the asthma group as a whole had a significantly higher percentage of atopic subjects (83%) when compared to the nonasthmatic control group (51%) (P<0.0001). Daytime symptoms of asthma occurred, on average, between 3.9 times per week in individuals with mild asthma, 6.8 times per week in individuals with moderate asthma, and nine times per week in individuals with severe asthma. Less than half the patients with mild asthma awoke from sleep owing to their asthma, whereas all patients with severe asthma woke from sleep most nights owing to their asthma. Unplanned visits to the family doctor for asthma over the previous 12 months varied between 0.51 per year in patients with mild asthma, 1.4 per year in patients with moderate asthma, and 4.2 per year in patients with severe asthma. Hospital admissions over the previous 12 months occurred in less than 5% of patients with mild asthma, in 30% of patients with moderate asthma, and in 70% of patients with severe asthma. Smoking history was obtained for all participants and nonsmokers comprised 47% of the nonasthmatics, and 38, 40 and 33% of the mild, moderate and severe asthmatics, respectively.

Table 1 Demographics of the study population

Ten SNPs in the ADAM33 gene, previously shown to be associated with asthma in UK and US populations,13 were screened using high throughput MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry and the Sequenom MassARRAY system. A maximum of four-plex analysis was achieved (V_5, V_4, S_1 and Q_−1), with one three-plex (V_2, ST_+7, F_+1), one two-plex (V_−1, V_−2) and one uni-plex (ST_+4). Approximately, 92% of the calls were conservative on the first run, with approximately 8% of the remaining calls, conservative or moderate on repeat measurement (respotting). Less than 1% of samples required a repeat PCR amplification. All the previously described polymorphisms were present in our population, with minor allele frequencies between 3 and 36% (Table 2).

Table 2 Minor allele frequencies of SNPs in ADAM33 and association analysis in an Australian population

The total population was in Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium for most SNPs studied (Table 2), as were the separate case and control populations, and LD was strong for all markers (Table 3), with only two exceptions: V_4 and V_5 were not in strong LD, despite being closely positioned; and ST+7 was in LD with all other markers, with the exception of its closest marker, ST+4, as shown previously.16, 27 Initial analysis of the SNP allele frequencies in controls, mild, moderate and severe asthma, using an ordinal logistic regression model (Table 2), revealed that most of the allele frequencies were similar to those reported in other Caucasian populations (Table 4), and there was no association between any one of the polymorphisms and asthma or asthma severity in our population. Importantly, however, certain haplotypes (Table 5a) were found to be significantly associated with asthma, and the score-based omnibus test for haplotypic association was highly significant, showing an association with asthma (permutation P=0.0002, based on 10 000 simulations) and asthma severity score (permutation P=0.0001). We then examined shorter haplotypes to determine if the result was due to particular subsets of SNPs. Using a sliding window of up to four consecutive SNPs, illustrated in Figure 1, the strongest association with asthma was with V_2 to ST_+7 (P=0.0004); the best window of three SNPs spanned V_4 to V_−1 (P=0.004), with a second smaller distinct peak over S_1 to F_+1 (P=0.01). When we excluded controls from our analysis of severity, the association score test was not significant (P=0.90), suggesting that the association was with asthma susceptibility, rather than with disease severity. Using a sliding window of up to four consecutive SNPs, illustrated in Figure 1, the strongest association with asthma was with V_2 to ST_+7 (P=0.0004); the best window of three SNPs spanned V_4 to V_−1 (P=0.004), with a second smaller distinct peak over S_1 to F_+1 (P=0.01). Closer examination of genotype counts at these SNPs revealed that the association signal was being driven by two SNPs, V_−1 and ST_+7. A log-linear model testing for association of joint (unphased) genotype at these two SNPs with asthma obtained an empirical P=0.00016 (10 000 Monte Carlo Markov Chain iterations, see Table 5b). The greatest difference between asthmatics and nonasthmatics was in the number of V_−1 T alleles present on a ST_+7 CC background (rows 3 and 4 of Table 5b).

Table 3 Pairwise linkage disequilibria (D’) of ADAM33 polymorphisms
Table 4 Comparison of ADAM33 allele frequencies in different case-control populations
Table 5 Associations between haplotypes and asthma and atopy in an Australian Caucasian population
Figure 1
figure 1

Plot of simulated P-values for testing haplotypic associations with asthma. The taller boxes along the X axis denote exons and the shorter boxes, the introns, of the ADAM33 gene. The tics along the upper axis give the position and names of the genotyped SNPs. The legend shows the sliding window comprising 1, 2, 3 or 4 consecutive SNPs, each tested for association in turn.

Table 6 Observed and expected counts of V_−1 and ST_+7 joint unphased genotypes in an Australian population

Further considering the American,16 Dutch16 and our Australian Caucasian populations, the five most common haplotypes occurring in our population appeared in the same ranking of frequency in other Caucasian populations (Table 6). Meta-analysis of the shared haplotypes in our Australian population, and the Dutch and US Caucasian populations,16 found the differences in haplotype frequencies to be significant (P=8.44e−13), with a highly significant overall association with asthma (P=7.14e−03). However, this P-value is driven by the rare haplotypes described in our Australian population, since if we analysed only the five most common haplotypes, the differences in haplotype frequencies were no longer significant (P=0.17) and there was almost no overall association with asthma (P=0.06).

Table 7 Comparison of common ADAM33 haplotypes between Caucasian populations

There was no association with atopy (P=0.396) and there was no association between genotype and smoking, nor did an adjustment for age and gender alter these results.

Discussion

We have used medium-throughput MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry and the MassARRAY system to screen ten polymorphisms in the ADAM33 gene, previously shown to be associated with asthma, in a large Australian Caucasian population of mild, moderate and severe asthmatics and nonasthmatic controls. Analysis of these SNPs, using an ordinal logistic regression model, revealed no association between any one of the polymorphisms and asthma severity. However, a score-based omnibus test for haplotypic association showed a significant association with asthma (P=0.0002) and with asthma severity (P=0.0001) in this population, driven especially by variation at the V_4 to V_−1 SNPs.

The ADAM proteins are type-I transmembrane proteins and a subgroup of the metzincin metalloproteinase superfamily,9, 10 with a disintegrin and a metalloproteinase domain. These proteins are thought to be involved in adhesive interactions, cell fusion and proteolysis,10, 28, 29, 30 all processes involved in tissue remodelling. Recent studies of ADAM33 have suggested that it has a particularly important role in airway remodelling and BHR.13, 14 It is expressed in lung fibroblasts, heart and bronchial smooth muscle, but not in bronchial epithelial cells.13, 30 In asthmatic lungs, it is similarly expressed in bronchial smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts, underlying the respiratory epithelium, and it is likely that the effects of ADAM33 on the repairing epithelium in the asthmatic lung are indirect, through expression and activity within the underlying submucosal smooth muscle layer.14 The metzincin family of metalloproteinases also includes matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), specifically regulated by tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs) during tissue remodelling. Although the physiological significance is unclear, a number of ADAMs are also inhibited by the TIMPs and, more specifically, ADAM33 activity has been shown to be inhibited by TIMP-3 and -4, slightly by TIMP-2, but not by TIMP-1.31

The ADAM33 gene has been mapped to chromosome 20p13, and has an open reading of 2442 bp, consisting of 22 exons.30 Numerous SNPs have been described in the gene13, 32 and several have been found to be associated with asthma and BHR in Caucasian populations from the UK, the US, Holland and Germany, using case–control, TDT (transmission/disequilibrium test) and haplotype analyses.13, 16, 27 Of the 37 polymorphisms in ADAM33, studied by Van Eerdewegh et al,13 six were found to be significantly associated with asthma in a combined the UK/US case–control population, and haplotype pair analysis in this population revealed five pairs of SNPs to be significantly associated with asthma at the P<0.001 level and a further 23 pairs to be significant at the P≤0.01 level. Positive associations have also found between some of these polymorphisms and asthma in African Americans and Hispanics,16 BHR in American Caucasians16 and Koreans,33 and atopy and longitudinal FEV1 decline in Dutch populations,16, 34 allergic rhinitis in a Japanese population,35 and have also been reported in a German population.27, 36 Interestingly, a recent study in Puerto Rican and Mexican populations failed to show an association between ADAM33, asthma, asthma severity and atopy in these populations (Table 4).37 Similarly, a study in a large population of childhood asthmatic subjects representative of a North American population with mild to moderate asthma, failed to show significant single-SNP associations between ADAM33 and either asthma or airways responsiveness.38

Unlike Van Eerdewegh et al,13 we did not detect association between any single SNP in the ADAM33 gene and asthma in our large Australian Caucasian population; nor was there an association between polymorphisms in ADAM33 and the atopic phenotype. This argues that the association between ADAM33 and asthma is presumably not mediated through the intermediate phenotype of atopy, in keeping with its suspected function. Our study is well powered, with the widest 95% confidence interval on the allelic odds ratio (for V_2) running from 0.6 to 1.7 (and average interval 0.78–1.33), so we believe we have not overlooked any large effects of individual SNPs.

In their combined population, Van Eerdewegh et al,13 found the single most significantly associated SNP to be V_−1. Although we did not find a significant association with this SNP alone in our population, V_−1/ST_+7 gave the most significant haplotypic result (P=0.00016). Van Eerdewegh et al, also found this haplotype to be associated with asthma (P=0.02),13 although their most significantly associated haplotype in their combined population was ST+4/V−3 (P=0.00004). In accord with most previous studies in Causasian populations, we found our strongest evidence for associations was between ADAM33 haplotypes and asthma and asthma severity, rather than with single SNPs and despite the apparently high level of LD between the polymorphisms. When we examined shorter haplotypes (using a sliding window approach, illustrated in Figure 1), there was some overlap of SNPs included in the most strongly associated sets, and those found to be associated with asthma in previous studies, including V_−1 and ST+7.13, 16, 27 Cox et al,39 have compared ADAM33 to calpain 10 (CAPN10) and NOD2. These are two other cases where haplotypes made up of noncoding variants, but not single SNPs, have been associated with disease phenotypes in a complex fashion.

The finding of association with asthma in the Australian population appeared to have been driven by five less common haplotypes, which together made up 4% of the haplotypes in the asthmatics. A comparison of haplotypes constructed using the SNPs simultaneously investigated in Australian, Dutch and American Caucasian populations, showed that the same five haplotypes are commonest in all three populations, suggesting that these populations are broadly comparable with respect to their genetic structure. Meta-analysis of the haplotypic frequencies found statistically significant differences in the minor haplotype frequencies, although it revealed a similar trend of rare haplotype frequencies in all three populations. It is difficult to speculate as to the functional importance of the rare haplotypes found to be associated with asthma in our Australian population. This population was principally Caucasian, however, it is remotely possible that the rare haplotypes represent occult admixture between populations with significantly different risks of asthma.

In our analysis for association of ADAM33 haplotype with disease severity, we were looking for a dose–response effect as one might expect that gene variants associated with increased airway remodelling, as suggested by Jongepier et al,34 to be likewise increased in more severe asthma. Thus, our analysis included the controls/nonasthma group as we would expect increasing frequency of associated alleles and/or haplotypes when going from the least to most severe phenotype. However, despite the suggestion that ADAM33 may act as a modifying gene,34 in our population ADAM33 haplotype did not seem to modify asthma severity per se, as differences in haplotype frequency were only significant between asthmatics and controls, and not within the different clinical groups.

SNP frequencies in the ADAM33 gene differ somewhat between populations, most significantly between different ethnic groups, possibly reflecting differences in the genetic basis of asthma in ethnically diverse populations.37 It is interesting to speculate that, while ADAM33 gene has a potential role as an asthma susceptibility and/or modifying locus, the effect of ADAM33 on asthma cannot be large precisely because ethnic differences in SNP allele frequencies would need to equate to equally large differences in asthma prevalence.

Many of the studies published to date have used different genotyping technologies, including a combination of automated single stranded conformational polymorphism (SSCP) analysis, exonuclease proofreading methods, restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLP) analysis, allele-specific oligonucleotide hybridisation (ASO), automated fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) detection and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry to type these SNPs in large populations.13, 16, 27, 37 The consistent genotype frequencies observed across the different Caucasian populations suggest that any of the SNP-typing technologies used are accurate. However, we have used MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry, as we are confident that this technique is a reliable, high volume genotyping method,40, 41 maintaining a high level of accuracy, even with multiplexed assays.40, 42, 43

Of the numerous polymorphisms described in the ADAM33 gene, 11 occur in the coding region and, of these, nine are nonsynonymous. It has been proposed that some of the ADAM33 polymorphisms may affect alternative splicing, splicing efficiency or mRNA turnover13 and hence accelerate the proliferation of smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts, leading to bronchial hyperreactivity and subepithelial fibrosis.44, 45, 46 It has also been suggested that those in the 3′UTR may be significant,36 although functional investigations of some of the 3′UTR polymorphisms have so far been unsuccessful.14 The actual functional significance of most of the polymorphisms in the ADAM33 gene has yet to be elucidated. It is worth noting that few have been shown to be associated with asthma in the populations screened to date, further suggesting that the causative mutation in ADAM33 has not yet been identified. It is important to note that these findings do not exclude the possibility that there are as yet unidentified functional variants either within the ADAM33 gene, or in a nearby gene, and that these associations are caused by LD.38

In conclusion, despite an adequately powered study, we have not been able to demonstrate association between any one of the ADAM33 SNPs studied and asthma, asthma severity or atopy in an Australian Caucasian population. However, and in agreement with a number of other studies, we have shown a significant association between ADAM33 haplotypes and asthma. Although it does not exclude an association with another locus in LD with ADAM33, this finding does suggest a likely role for ADAM33 in the asthma phenotype.