Brain-scanning techniques promise to give an objective measure of whether someone is in pain, but researchers question whether they are reliable enough for the courtroom.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Open Access articles citing this article.
Science and Engineering Ethics Open Access 15 December 2017
Nature Reviews Neurology Open Access 08 September 2017
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Wager, T. D. et al. N. Engl. J. Med. 368, 1388–1397 (2013).
Hashmi, J. A. et al. Brain 136, 2751–2768 (2013).
deCharms, R. C. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 18626–18631 (2005).
Marks, D. H., Valsasina, P., Rocca, M. A. & Filippi, M. Internet J. Pain Symptom Contr. Palliat. Care 8, 1 (2009).
Callan, D., Mills, L., Nott, C., England, R. & England, S. PLoS ONE 9, e98007 (2014).
Weisberg, D. S., Keil, F. C., Goodstein, S., Rawson, E. & Gray, J. R. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 20, 470–477 (2008).
Salmanowitz, N. J. Law Biosci. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsv003 (2015).
See Editorial p.456
Related links in Nature Research
Related external links
About this article
Cite this article
Reardon, S. Neuroscience in court: The painful truth. Nature 518, 474–476 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/518474a
This article is cited by
Nature Neuroscience (2022)
Science and Engineering Ethics (2019)
Nature Reviews Neurology (2017)