Cancer

Staying together on the road to metastasis

Most deaths from breast cancer occur when the primary tumour spreads to secondary sites. It now emerges that clusters of tumour cells that enter the bloodstream form metastases more often than single circulating tumour cells.

A key goal in cancer research is to understand the mechanisms underlying the metastatic process, by which cancer cells spread from a primary tumour to other sites and form secondary tumours. Patients with breast cancer, for example, usually do not die from their primary tumours, which are surgically removed, but from metastatic tumours in organs such as the bone, liver or lung. Writing in Cell, Aceto et al.1 provide information about this complex pathway. They find that the cells that escape from primary tumours sometimes do so as clusters, and that these clusters have a higher ability to form lung metastases than single escaped cells, despite being present at much lower levels in the blood. The authors show that this difference stems from the expression of a cell-adhesion protein that allows the cells to stick together in clusters, thereby providing a survival advantage in the lungs.

Blood-borne circulating tumour cells (CTCs) that have broken away from primary tumours were described more than 30 years ago, but technological limitations have until recently made it challenging to study them. With the advent of improved methods to detect, quantify and isolate CTCs2, we now know that these cells have tumour-forming ability3,4 and that CTC numbers have prognostic significance in many types of cancer (see ref. 5 for a review).

Considering that there are many more CTCs in the blood than there are metastatic tumours, it is of interest to discover the characteristics of a successful circulating cell. By mixing tumour cells labelled with different colours, Aceto and colleagues generated multicoloured primary breast tumours in mice, which allowed them to visualize multicoloured CTC clusters in the blood and lungs. Quantification revealed that even though cell clusters made up less than 3% of total CTC 'events' in the blood, more than 50% of the metastases were derived from clusters. The authors also found that CTC clusters represent aggregates of cells originating from the tumour and entering the vasculature, rather than tumour cells that clump together in the circulation to form clusters.

To strengthen their conclusions, the authors compared the ability of single CTCs and CTC clusters to generate lung metastases directly. Following injection into the tail vein of mice, cells from both populations efficiently reached the lungs, but the single CTCs underwent high levels of apoptotic cell death, whereas the CTC clusters survived much better and thus formed metastases more often.

The results from these experimental models are exciting, but do they hold up in patients with cancer? To look at the prognostic significance of CTC clusters, the researchers monitored the blood of patients with advanced metastatic cancer. CTCs were found in 68% of the patients; among these, clusters were continuously detected in 5.6% of the cases. Despite the rarity of the clusters, their continued presence was correlated with a significantly shorter period without disease progression in patients with breast cancer and with reduced overall survival in patients with prostate cancer.

To identify the molecular mechanisms governing CTC-cluster formation, Aceto and colleagues used devices called negCTC-iChips6 to isolate single CTCs and CTC clusters from the blood of patients with breast cancer, and then sequenced RNA transcripts from the cells. Although there were no large gene-expression differences in the cells originating from the two populations, expression of some cluster-associated genes, including that encoding the protein plakoglobin, was increased in cells from clusters.

Plakoglobin was discovered more than 30 years ago as an adhesion protein associated with the cell membrane. Although it has previously been implicated in cancer, its role is controversial (see ref. 7 for a review). For example, one study proposed plakoglobin as a tumour-suppressor protein, whose expression is downregulated by epigenetic (non-DNA-sequence-changing) modulation in some tumours8, whereas another suggested that it has a tumour-inducing effect9. It is possible that plakoglobin has different roles in different cancer types, but from Aceto and colleagues' results it seems clear that the protein acts as a metastasis promoter in breast cancer. Indeed, in an in silico analysis of publicly available data sets from almost 2,000 patients, the authors correlated high plakoglobin levels with a significant reduction in metastasis-free survival time.

Returning to mouse studies, the researchers found that reducing plakoglobin expression in breast-cancer cells resulted in the destruction of CTC clusters and reduced their metastatic ability. These data suggest that plakoglobin expression in tumour cells is responsible for the formation of CTC clusters and that plakoglobin-mediated clustering provides these cells with a survival advantage when they reach the lungs (Fig. 1).

Figure 1: Circulating tumour cells and their clusters.
figure1

Circulating tumour cells (CTCs) are cells that escape from a primary tumour and enter the bloodstream, which carries them to distant organs where they can form metastatic tumours. Although most CTCs are single cells, occasional CTC clusters are detected in the blood of patients; the presence of these clusters, which show high expression of the adhesion protein plakoglobin, is correlated with worse patient prognosis. Using in vivo mouse models of breast-cancer metastases, Aceto et al.1 show that CTC clusters originate from groups of cells in the primary tumour that are held together by plakoglobin. The authors also demonstrate that CTC clusters have a greater potential to form lung metastases than single CTCs, owing to a survival advantage in the lungs.

But how does plakoglobin work? Is its effect mediated by adhesion activity and/or by controlling signalling pathways in the cell? Plakoglobin is a homologue of the protein β-catenin, and competes with it for binding to E-cadherin (another adhesion protein) and transcription factors of the TCF family. These proteins are involved in the Wnt signalling pathway, which is abnormally active in several types of breast cancer. Perhaps plakoglobin influences signalling by antagonizing β-catenin and thereby affects Wnt signalling in breast-cancer cells. This and other hypotheses will need to be investigated.

It will also be of interest to assess whether plakoglobin is a drug-targetable molecule in metastases. Reduction of plakoglobin expression did not affect the dissemination of single CTCs to the lungs in Aceto and colleagues' mouse studies, and these cells, although they have less metastatic power than CTC clusters, can still colonize distant organs. Thus, identifying molecular targets that are common to all CTC populations remains a goal for future studies.

Although several questions about CTCs are still open, the efforts currently being expended on characterizing these cells are motivated by their clear clinical relevance10. Thanks to the feasibility of blood sampling and the fact that CTCs can be detected even in the early stages of primary cancer, these cells could be excellent biomarkers for early diagnosis. CTCs and CTC clusters could also be quantified to monitor treatment responses and the progression of metastatic disease. Moreover, considering the genetic differences reported between primary tumours and metastases11, choosing effective therapies to treat metastases might be better informed by analysing CTCs, the cells capable of disseminating to distant organs, rather than by analysing primary tumour cells.

References

  1. 1

    Aceto, N. et al. Cell 158, 1110–1122 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Yu, M., Stott, S., Toner, M., Maheswaran, S. & Haber, D. A. J. Cell Biol. 192, 373–382 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Baccelli, I. et al. Nature Biotechnol. 31, 539–544 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Hodgkinson, C. L. et al. Nature Med. 20, 897–903 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Alix-Panabières, C. & Pantel, K. Nature Rev. Cancer 14, 623–631 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Ozkumur, E. et al. Sci. Transl. Med. 5, 179ra47 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Aktary, Z. & Pasdar, M. Int. J. Cell Biol. 2012, 189521 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Shiina, H. et al. Cancer Res. 65, 2130–2138 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Hakimelahi, S. et al. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 10905–10911 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Krebs, M. G. et al. Nature Rev. Clin. Oncol. 11, 129–144 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Shah, S. P. et al. Nature 461, 809–813 (2009).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Alessia Bottos or Nancy E. Hynes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bottos, A., Hynes, N. Staying together on the road to metastasis. Nature 514, 309–310 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/514309a

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing