South America

Citation databases omit local journals

South America's research impact is underestimated in the main citation databases, as you suggest (Nature 510, 202–203; 2014). However, incorporating the Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO) Index into Thomson Reuter's Science Citation Index will not rectify the situation.

SciELO captures only a fraction of the continent's peer-reviewed publications. For example, it indexes papers from just 267 of Brazil's 1,909 journals. Coverage by Elsevier's Scopus database is also inadequate.

According to Latin America's most comprehensive database on scholarly journals, the Latindex Catalog, 4,882 journals in South America meet specified editorial criteria (see go.nature.com/lbrng2). Scopus includes only 726 of these journals (15%); regional journals are not eligible (see also go.nature.com/laywal).

That leaves 4,156 journals whose impact is hidden from Scopus. If we assume conservatively that each of these publishes only 20 articles per year by South American authors, then at least 83,120 articles are being overlooked annually.

The commercial databases should close this coverage gap to properly reflect the impact of research in South America.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Pablo Alperin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alperin, J. Citation databases omit local journals. Nature 511, 155 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/511155c

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing