Correspondence | Published:


Longitude Prize now an objective decision

Nature volume 511, page 31 (03 July 2014) | Download Citation

Martin Rees writes that John Harrison “came closest to receiving the reward money” offered in the 1714 Longitude Act (Nature 509, 401; 2014). This description conceals a long and painful battle between astronomers and those who argued that Harrison should be awarded the prize for his marine chronometer, designed to determine the longitude of a ship's position by using existing tables.

The astronomers of the day claimed that watching Jupiter's moons, as suggested by Galileo, was the scientific solution. But in practice, this 'astronomic' solution would not work under a cloudy sky.

Today, by contrast, the winner of the 2014 Longitude Prize, who we now know will be working on antibiotic resistance, will be “decided objectively — as in athletics”, as Rees points out.

Author information


  1. Uppsala University, Sweden.

    • Carl G. Ribbing


  1. Search for Carl G. Ribbing in:

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carl G. Ribbing.

About this article

Publication history




By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Newsletter Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing