Books & Arts | Published:

Science of colour: Hue and eye

Nature volume 511, pages 2930 (03 July 2014) | Download Citation

Barbara Kiser revels in an immersive show revealing the scientific base coat to 700 years of European art.

Making Colour

The National Gallery, London.  Until 7 September 2014.

For millennia, artists chased the blues — from Egyptian blue frit to ultramarine, azurite, cobalt blue and indigo. Derived from earthbound minerals, metals and plants, these pigments signalled the celestial, tinting the robes of painted Renaissance Virgins by the score, and the saturated sky behind the meeting of god and mortal in Titian's sixteenth-century masterwork Bacchus and Ariadne. The hunt for blue — and all the other hues — is a tale as bound up in science and technology as in aesthetics and tradition.

That long, complex quest is chronicled in Making Colour at London's National Gallery. The show peers into the luminous slicks of paint in a Monet or a Memling to reveal the chemical and physical traits of the pigments and their origins. In rooms devoted to blue, green, yellow, red, purple, and gold and silver, exemplary paintings are set next to raw materials and the pigments derived from them. Alongside are manufactured objects glazed or dyed with the same colourants, pointing to the fact that up to the nineteenth century, many pigments were by-products of dye manufacture, metallurgy and other industries.

Vermilion, an ancient pigment, features in Edgar Degas' innovative 1896 Combing the Hair. Image: ©The National Gallery, London

“We are trying to tell the history of materials in European painting in very visual form,” explains exhibition co-curator Ashok Roy. He heads the gallery's science department, which for decades has analysed the collection — spanning key schools of European art from the fourteenth to the nineteenth centuries. Over much of that time, artists “needed spectrally powerful colours for their paintings, particularly for the often brilliantly coloured robes of religious figures”, notes Roy.

A vast sunburst of colour presides at the start of the show — the 72-colour 'chromatic diagram' devised in 1839 by chemist Michel Eugène Chevreul as a way of thinking about complementary colours. Nearby is Vincent Van Gogh's Two Crabs (1889), an electric contrast of hot reds and acid greens that testifies to Chevreul's influence. A cluster of other colour wheels includes that of Johann Wolfgang von Goethe. The German polymath's ideas on colour were muddled, but they opened the way to Chevreul's and influenced J. M. W. Turner, whose palette, smeared with a muddy impasto of russets and greens, is showcased across the room.

Beyond, the near-black walls give a chromatic intensity to the paintings and objects. Another kind of intensity lies in what it took to acquire, transport and process some pigments. The 'blue room' features a vast photo of an Afghan miner lugging a toddler-sized chunk of lapis lazuli — the source of the mineral lazurite, from which natural ultramarine was derived. From around 1200 to the nineteenth century, European painters imported lapis lazuli from the remote Sar-e-Sang mines in what is now Afghanistan, by way of Baghdad, Damascus, Cyprus and Italian ports. The extraction of the pigment, a chore involving lye, wax and plenty of elbow grease, failed to deter artists eager for strong blues and the cachet of costliness.

A family of yellow pigments highlight a gown in Anthony Van Dyck's portrait, and an angel's robe (below). Image: Lady Elizabeth Thimbelby and Dorothy, Viscountess Andover, 1637/© The National Gallery, London

Thomas Gainsborough's 1785 portrait of theatre diva Sarah Siddons in a blue-striped dress marks how chemical experimentation provided an alternative: Prussian blue. Around 1704, the Berlin alchemist and colour-maker Diesbach was attempting to make red 'lake' pigment using potash, iron sulphate and a decoction of dried cochineal beetles. The potash, however, was contaminated with 'animal oil' derived from blood, and the result was a deep blue — one of the first modern synthesized pigments.

Majolica (glazed terracotta) angel by the Renaissance Della Robbia family. Image: Kneeling Angel holding a Candlestick, 1500–50/Lent by the Syndics of The Fitzwilliam Museum/© The Fitzwilliam Museum, Cambridge

Pigments that were spin-offs from industry are showcased by a traverse through yellow. The mustard tint on the robe of a majolica (glazed terracotta) angel by the Renaissance Della Robbia workshop is based on a lead and antimony colourant — a family of yellows that sometimes also incorporates tin. These stable oxides have been used in glass-making and ceramic glazes for centuries, and they appear in works by seventeenth-century artists such as Nicolas Poussin and Anthony Van Dyck. For the decidedly worldly figure of the viscountess in Lady Elizabeth Thimbelby and Dorothy, Viscountess Andover (1637), Van Dyck picked out the peaks in her sumptuous gold-satin dress with lead–tin yellow; Pietro da Cortona's Saint Cecilia nearby features a yellow based on lead, tin and antimony.

The nineteenth century was, in Roy's words, “an explosion of colour chemistry” that crowded palettes with cobalt blue, cadmium colours and synthetic ultramarine. The sharp dabs of fresh green and olive in Paul Cézanne's 1890 Hillside in Provence testify to the strength, stability and brilliance of the new chromium-based viridian and the copper–arsenic compound emerald green. Premixed in tubes, these pigments helped to enable the novel practice of painting en plein air. Yet new did not negate old. In his 1896 Combing the Hair — a conflagration of pinks, brick reds and terracottas centring on the taut, flame-like hair of the seated girl — Edgar Degas deploys red earth, red lead and the mercury sulphide vermilion. This last has been used in painting, first as the natural mineral cinnabar and then in a synthetic form, for millennia.

The chromatic trail of primary and secondary colours comes to a halt in a welter of metallics. Giovanni Girolamo Savoldo's sixteenth-century Mary Magdalene almost steals the show, even though the silvery hue of her cloak is a beautiful illusion crafted in lead white and lamp black. That every hue you have seen here is a dance between wavelengths of electromagnetic radiation, the optic nerve and the brain is left for last (and for more on this and many topics featured in the show, see Philip Ball's excellent Bright Earth; University of Chicago Press, 2001). On the way out of the exhibition, a well-crafted film on human perception awaits, including a crowd-sourced experiment. Created by neuroscientist Anya Hurlbert and backed by the London-based Wellcome Trust, this examines colour constancy (how we perceive colours as the same in different lights) by inviting visitors to assess two reproductions of a Cézanne still life under varying illumination.

But at base, Making Colour ushers us into a materials world. Beyond the artists' transformation of coloured earth or ground resin into luminous windows on lost worlds is a broader transformation in chemistry, exploration and commerce — a necessary underlay to the aesthetic urge.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Barbara Kiser is Nature's Books and Arts editor.

    • Barbara Kiser

Authors

  1. Search for Barbara Kiser in:

About this article

Publication history

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/511029a

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Newsletter Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing