Cell biology

Potency unchained

Differentiated cells have been reprogrammed to an embryonic-like state using a physical stimulus. This treatment generates a new cell population that contributes to both the embryo and the placenta. See Article p.641 & Letter p.676

Cell specialization in mammals is essential for diverse functions, such as muscle contraction and nerve conduction. These specializations become fixed during development, and conversion between differentiated cell types seems to be extremely rare. However, in this issue, two studies by Obokata et al.1,2 show that cells isolated from newborn mice lose their identity on exposure to mildly acidic conditions. Remarkably, instead of triggering cell death or tumour growth, as might be expected, a new cell state emerges that exhibits an unprecedented potential for differentiation into every possible cell type.

Studies on tissue regeneration in amphibians, reptiles and birds indicate that differentiated cells have some ability to dedifferentiate or to switch identity. Mammalian cells are more resistant, but fate conversion is observed in certain cancers. It was only with the cloning of Dolly the sheep3, in which nuclear material from the mammary cell of an adult sheep was transferred into an enucleated egg cell to produce a cloned animal, that the capacity for complete reprogramming of the mammalian genome was confirmed. However, cloning does not convert whole cells.

Whole cells can be induced to switch identity by genetic manipulation. The introduction of certain transcription factors can in specific contexts rewire gene circuitry, leading to changes in cell specialization4. In 2006, the cell-identity and cloning research paths were unified through the discovery of a phenomenon known as induced pluripotency5: when mouse fibroblast cells were treated with a quartet of embryonic regulatory factors, a small percentage adopted the molecular and functional attributes of embryonic stem cells. The resulting induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) had the dual abilities to self-renew indefinitely and to differentiate into all somatic cell types (Fig. 1a). Subsequently, iPSCs have been produced from a range of adult cell types, fostering enthusiasm worldwide for developing customized disease-modelling and cell-therapy applications.

Figure 1: Alternative methods for dedifferentiating specialized cells.
figure1

a, Differentiated cells are typically reprogrammed to an embryonic-like (pluripotent) state using transcription factors and a cell-culture medium that promotes pluripotency5. This creates induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), which can self-renew and contribute to all the cell types in a developing embryo, but not the placenta. iPSC generation occurs through a proliferative intermediate stage. b, Obokata and colleagues report1,2 that dedifferentiation can also be achieved by short-term exposure of differentiated cells to a solution of low pH, a process they call stimulus-triggered acquisition of pluripotency (STAP). STAP cells do not proliferate, but subsequent treatment with pluripotency-promoting media produces STAP stem cells, which have the same properties as iPSCs. When cultured in a medium that promotes the growth of trophoblast stem cells (a placenta-generating cell type), STAP cells acquire trophoblast-like characteristics. Unlike iPSCs, the cells can contribute to the placenta.

What, then, is the significance of the two reports by Obokata and colleagues? The authors were inspired by the notion that physical stimuli might be sufficient to change a cell's identity. An example from nature is temperature-dependent sex determination in crocodile embryos6. And in the laboratory, frog cells fated to form skin will develop into brain tissue7 if exposed to a solution of low pH. These changes in fate occur in embryonic progenitor cells. In their first report (page 641), Obokata and co-workers1 investigated the effect of physical stimuli on cells from newborn mice.

In a similar manner to that used in iPSC reprogramming studies5, the researchers monitored cells using a 'reporter' protein that fluoresces when a gene associated with pluripotency is turned on. They applied various stresses to white blood cells and found that, after a short exposure to a solution of low pH, the cells lost markers of blood identity, and a proportion activated the pluripotency reporter. The authors collected cells marked with the reporter and found that the cells had gene markers typical of early embryos. They describe this phenomenon as stimulus-triggered acquisition of pluripotency (STAP).

When injected into embryos, cells generated by STAP ('STAP cells') produced chimaeras — mice composed of cells originating from both the host embryo and the STAP cells. The ability to produce chimaeras is a property that was previously thought to be exclusive to embryonic stem cells and iPSCs. STAP cells differ from both of these cell types, however, in that they have little or no capacity for self-renewal and can be maintained for only a few days. The authors investigated this discrepancy and discovered that, if STAP cells are transferred into the culture conditions used to grow pluripotent stem cells, they begin to proliferate, and acquire structural features and gene markers diagnostic of embryonic stem cells. The researchers termed these self-renewing cells STAP stem cells (Fig. 1b).

The STAP-cell state might therefore be similar to the incompletely reprogrammed intermediate cells observed during iPSC formation8. However, as documented in Obokata and colleagues' second report2 (page 676), a further surprise was in store. Examination of chimaeras produced from STAP cells revealed that the cells colonized extraembryonic layers such as the trophoblast, a structure that gives rise to the placenta, in addition to the embryo body. This colonization is rarely seen in chimaeras produced from embryonic stem cells or iPSCs, and it implies that cells generated by STAP have an unusually broad developmental potency. The authors then tested culture conditions normally used to obtain trophoblast stem cells. STAP cells again proliferated, but now acquired a trophoblast-like identity, confirming their broad potency (Fig. 1b).

The STAP state may represent a developmental stage that precedes segregation of extraembryonic and embryonic cell lineages. However, it is not evident that embryos ever contain single cells that have the complement of markers and behaviours exhibited by STAP cells. An alternative explanation could be that STAP cells constitute a mixture of cells predisposed to extraembryonic or embryonic differentiation. More provocatively, STAP cells might be an indeterminate, synthetic cell type — a blank slate — from which extraembryonic or embryonic gene circuitries emerge in appropriate environments.

The unexpected finding that a physical stimulus can trigger dedifferentiation of cells to a state of unrestricted potency opens up the possibility of obtaining patient-specific stem cells by a simple procedure, without genetic manipulation. STAP cells have yet to be produced from humans, however. Obokata and colleagues1 provided evidence of reproducible STAP-cell generation from different mouse tissues, but they did not test other species. Furthermore, they used immature cells as a starting material, and it remains to be seen whether adult cells will respond similarly. Nonetheless, they have established a new principle: that a physical stimulus can be sufficient to dismember gene-control circuitry and create a 'plastic' state from which a previously unattainable level of potency can rapidly develop.

How pluripotent circuitry self-organizes, and how the body suppresses this, are fascinating questions. Notably, provision of leukaemia inhibitory factor (LIF), a cell-signalling molecule, promotes the emergence of STAP cells. This is tantalizing because LIF is the self-renewal factor for embryonic stem cells, has a crucial role in the formation of iPSCs9,10 and drives the conversion of germ cells to pluripotent cells11.

References

  1. 1

    Obokata, H. et al. Nature 505, 641–647 (2014).

  2. 2

    Obokata, H. et al. Nature 505, 676–680 (2014).

  3. 3

    Wilmut, I., Schnieke, A. E., McWhir, J., Kind, A. J. & Campbell, K. H. S. Nature 385, 810–813 (1997).

  4. 4

    Graf, T. Cell Stem Cell 9, 504–516 (2011).

  5. 5

    Takahashi, K. & Yamanaka, S. Cell 126, 663–676 (2006).

  6. 6

    Gilbert, S. F. Developmental Biology 6th edn (Sinauer, 2009).

  7. 7

    Holtfreter, J. J. Exp. Zool. 106, 197–222 (1947).

  8. 8

    Silva, J. et al. PLoS Biol. 6, e253 (2008).

  9. 9

    Yang, J. et al. Cell Stem Cell 7, 319–328 (2010).

  10. 10

    Stuart, H. T. et al. Curr. Biol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.12.040 (2014).

  11. 11

    Leitch, H. G. et al. Stem Cell Rep. 1, 66–78 (2013).

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Austin Smith.

Related audio

Scientists have reprogrammed differentiated body cells into pluripotent embryonic stem cells – using acid.

Scientists have reprogrammed differentiated body cells into pluripotent embryonic stem cells – using acid.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, A. Potency unchained. Nature 505, 622–623 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/505622a

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.