The map in the story ‘Quake fears rise at Japan’s reactors’ ( Nature 494, 14–15; 2013) wrongly suggested that only a single reactor, rather than the whole plant, is under inspection at Oi.
The News story ‘Company offers portable peer review’ ( Nature 494, 161; 2013) wrongly stated that the European Molecular Biology Organization’s open peer review was not anonymous — the reviews are made public but are anonymized.
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found at 10.1038/494014a
The online version of the original article can be found at 10.1038/494161a
Related links
Related links
Related links in Nature Research
Related external links
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Corrections. Nature 494, 295 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/494295b
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/494295b
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
