The probability that giant-planet-like signals detected by the Kepler spacecraft are not from planets is higher than expected. The result underscores the importance of making follow-up observations to confirm the nature of the signals.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Where on earth to publish? A sample survey comparing traditional and open access publishing in the oncological field
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research Open Access 22 January 2013
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Santerne, A. et al. Astron. Astrophys. 545, A76 (2012).
Morton, T. D. & Johnson, J. A. Astrophys. J. 738, 170 (2011).
Morton, T. D. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.1568 (2012).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cameron, A. Astrophysical false positives. Nature 492, 48–49 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/492048a
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/492048a
This article is cited by
-
Where on earth to publish? A sample survey comparing traditional and open access publishing in the oncological field
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research (2013)
