Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Human behaviour

A cooperative instinct


Acting on a gut feeling can sometimes lead to poor decisions. But it will usually support the common good, according to a study showing that human intuition favours cooperative, rather than selfish, behaviour. See Letter p. 427

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout


  1. Kahneman, D. Thinking, Fast and Slow (Allen Lane, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rand, D. G., Greene, J. D. & Nowak, M. A. Nature 489, 427–430 (2012).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Moore, D. & Loewenstein, G. Social Justice Res. 17, 189–202 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bowles, S. & Gintis, H. A Cooperative Species: Human Reciprocity and its Evolution (Princeton Univ. Press, 2011).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Fehr, E. & Schmidt, K. M. in Handbook of the Economics of Giving, Altruism and Reciprocity (eds Kolm, S.-C. & Ythier, J. M.) Ch. 8 (Elsevier, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fischbacher, U., Gächter, S. & Quercia, S. J. Econ. Psychol. 33, 897–913 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Haidt, J. The Righteous Mind. Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion (Allen Lane, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cubitt, R. P., Drouvelis, M., Gächter, S. & Kabalin, R. J. Public Econ. 95, 253–264 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Horton, J. J., Rand, D. G. & Zeckhauser, R. J. Exp. Econ. 14, 399–425 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rubinstein, A. Econ. J. 117, 1243–1259 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Piovesan, M. & Wengström, E. Econ. Lett. 105, 193–196 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cappelletti, D., Güth, W. & Ploner, M. J. Econ. Psychol. 32, 940–950 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Grimm, V. & Mengel, F. Econ. Lett. 111, 113–115 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sutter, M., Kocher, M. & Strauß, S. Econ. Lett. 81, 341–347 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. von Dawans, B., Fischbacher, U., Kirschbaum, C., Fehr, E. & Heinrichs, M. Psychol. Sci. 23, 651 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Simon, H. A. Psychol. Sci. 3, 150–161 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon Gächter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gächter, S. A cooperative instinct. Nature 489, 374–375 (2012).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing