The chemical content of a star that was born relatively shortly after the formation of the Milky Way calls into question conventional understanding of how stars formed in the early Universe.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Caffau, E. et al. Astron. Astrophys. 542, A51 (2012).
Caffau, E. et al. Nature 477, 67–69 (2011).
Christlieb, N. et al. Nature 419, 904–906 (2002).
Frebel, A. et al. Nature 434, 871–873 (2005).
Bromm, V. & Larson, R. B. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 42, 79–118 (2004).
Frebel, A., Johnson, J. L. & Bromm, V. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 380, L40–L44 (2007).
Norris, J. E. Nature 477, 37–39 (2011).
Sneden, C., Cowan, J. J. & Gallino, R. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 46, 241–288 (2008).
Spite, M. & Spite, F. Nature 297, 483–485 (1982).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cowan, J. One of the first of the second stars. Nature 488, 288–289 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/488288a
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/488288a
