Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

No to chlorhexidine

Sir, we read with interest the commentary on our article entitled A study of visual and blood contamination on reprocessed endodontic files from general dental practice (BDJ 2005; 199: 522–525) and noted that '...a decontamination programme reported by Paraschos et al. appears to be satisfactory...'1 — a close inspection of this method reveals that it involved pre-treating soiled instruments with chlorhexidine. The use of chlorhexidine to clean instruments is a poor choice of cleaning agent, since this chemical tends to stick to proteins and various surfaces rather than exert a detergent action. The use of chlorhexidine for example, in surgical hand scrubs, for cleaning instruments has been highlighted as poor practice and is not recommended in Scotland.2 Advice on alternative agents for use as detergents can be found online at www.show.scot.nhs.uk/scieh/.

We recommend that practitioners do not use chlorhexidine containing agents for cleaning dental instruments.

References

  1. Parashos P, Linsuwanont P, Messer H H . A cleaning protocol for rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. Aust Dent J 2004; 49: 20–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Scottish Executive Health Department Letter (HDL) 2005 (01) Decontamination Compliance in Primary Care

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, A., Bagg, J. & McHugh, S. No to chlorhexidine. Br Dent J 200, 31 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4813128

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4813128

Search

Quick links